53 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...
CQQQ vs GDS
CQQQ vs GDS Comparison
Open Charts CQQQ vs GDS
Invesco China Technology ETF
Price$39.23
Change+$1.04 (+2.72%)
Volume$137.47K
Net Assets645.41M
GDS Holdings
Price$23.52
Change+$0.80 (+3.52%)
Volume$1.79M
Capitalization4.42B
CQQQ vs GDS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CQQQ vs. GDS commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQQQ is a Hold and GDS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GDS: Fundamental Ratings
GDS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 25 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 26 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CQQQ | GDS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 11 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 87% | 11 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 88% | 11 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 11 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 89% | 11 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 89% | 11 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 82% | 11 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 90% | 26 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 83% | 11 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 88% | 11 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CQQQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQQQ has been closely correlated with BILI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CQQQ jumps, then BILI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CQQQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CQQQ | 100% | +2.72% | ||
| BILI - CQQQ | 79% Closely correlated | +2.89% | ||
| BIDU - CQQQ | 75% Closely correlated | +2.71% | ||
| WB - CQQQ | 73% Closely correlated | +3.84% | ||
| GDS - CQQQ | 63% Loosely correlated | +3.52% | ||
| DADA - CQQQ | 63% Loosely correlated | +3.10% | ||
More | ||||
GDS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GDS has been loosely correlated with AI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GDS jumps, then AI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GDS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GDS | 100% | +3.52% | ||
| AI - GDS | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.93% | ||
| VNET - GDS | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.71% | ||
| PSFE - GDS | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.22% | ||
| FLYW - GDS | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.30% | ||
| PAY - GDS | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.33% | ||
More | ||||