50 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CQQQ vs GDS
CQQQ vs GDS Comparison
Open Charts CQQQ vs GDS
Invesco China Technology ETF
Price$60.24
Change-$0.17 (-0.28%)
Volume$1.34M
Net Assets2.81B
GDS Holdings
Price$39.63
Change-$1.72 (-4.16%)
Volume$2.8M
Capitalization7.82B
CQQQ vs GDS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CQQQ vs. GDS commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQQQ is a Buy and GDS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GDS: Fundamental Ratings
GDS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 85 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 81 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 42 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 88 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CQQQ | GDS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CQQQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQQQ has been closely correlated with BILI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CQQQ jumps, then BILI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CQQQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CQQQ | 100% | -0.28% | ||
| BILI - CQQQ | 79% Closely correlated | -1.32% | ||
| BIDU - CQQQ | 75% Closely correlated | +1.26% | ||
| ATHM - CQQQ | 67% Closely correlated | -0.73% | ||
| WB - CQQQ | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.71% | ||
| GDS - CQQQ | 63% Loosely correlated | -4.16% | ||
More | ||||
GDS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GDS has been loosely correlated with VNET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GDS jumps, then VNET could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GDS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GDS | 100% | -4.16% | ||
| VNET - GDS | 64% Loosely correlated | -5.87% | ||
| AI - GDS | 55% Loosely correlated | +5.04% | ||
| PSFE - GDS | 41% Loosely correlated | +2.08% | ||
| FLYW - GDS | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.29% | ||
| PAY - GDS | 39% Loosely correlated | +4.57% | ||
More | ||||