Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CQQQ vs MCHS
CQQQ vs MCHS Comparison
Open Charts CQQQ vs MCHS
Invesco China Technology ETF
Price$57.12
Change-$1.12 (-1.92%)
Volume$25.62K
Net Assets2.14B
Matthews China Discovery Active ETF
Price$34.00
Change-$0.48 (-1.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.73M
CQQQ vs MCHS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CQQQ vs. MCHS commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQQQ is a Buy and MCHS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CQQQ has more net assets: 2.14B vs. MCHS (2.73M). CQQQ has a higher annual dividend yield than MCHS: CQQQ (44.997) vs MCHS (35.358). CQQQ was incepted earlier than MCHS: CQQQ (16 years) vs MCHS (2 years). CQQQ (0.65) has a lower expense ratio than MCHS (0.89). MCHS has a higher turnover CQQQ (43.00) vs CQQQ (43.00).
| CQQQ | MCHS | CQQQ / MCHS | |
| Gain YTD | 44.997 | 35.358 | 127% |
| Net Assets | 2.14B | 2.73M | 78,532% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.89 | 73% |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 115.31 | 37% |
| Yield | 0.21 | 4.18 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CQQQ | MCHS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 90% | 23 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
MCHS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHS has been loosely correlated with BZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCHS jumps, then BZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCHS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCHS | 100% | N/A | ||
| BZ - MCHS | 52% Loosely correlated | -2.13% | ||
| ACMR - MCHS | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.50% | ||
| YMM - MCHS | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.31% | ||
| ZH - MCHS | 35% Loosely correlated | -4.40% | ||
| ATAT - MCHS | 35% Loosely correlated | -1.15% |