Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CQQQ vs MCHS
CQQQ vs MCHS Comparison
Open Charts CQQQ vs MCHS
Invesco China Technology ETF
Price$51.85
Change-$0.74 (-1.41%)
Volume$7.09K
Net Assets2.9B
Matthews China Discovery Active ETF
Price$32.53
Change-$0.10 (-0.31%)
Volume$100
Net Assets2.61M
CQQQ vs MCHS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CQQQ vs. MCHS commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQQQ is a Hold and MCHS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CQQQ has more net assets: 2.9B vs. MCHS (2.61M). CQQQ has a higher annual dividend yield than MCHS: CQQQ (31.717) vs MCHS (27.541). CQQQ was incepted earlier than MCHS: CQQQ (16 years) vs MCHS (2 years). CQQQ (0.65) has a lower expense ratio than MCHS (0.89). MCHS has a higher turnover CQQQ (43.00) vs CQQQ (43.00).
| CQQQ | MCHS | CQQQ / MCHS | |
| Gain YTD | 31.717 | 27.541 | 115% |
| Net Assets | 2.9B | 2.61M | 111,230% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.89 | 73% |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 115.31 | 37% |
| Yield | 0.20 | 4.17 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CQQQ | MCHS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 59% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 56% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 83% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 56% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CQQQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQQQ has been closely correlated with BILI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CQQQ jumps, then BILI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CQQQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CQQQ | 100% | -1.37% | ||
| BILI - CQQQ | 79% Closely correlated | -3.51% | ||
| BIDU - CQQQ | 75% Closely correlated | -1.41% | ||
| ATHM - CQQQ | 66% Closely correlated | -1.25% | ||
| GDS - CQQQ | 63% Loosely correlated | +2.56% | ||
| TME - CQQQ | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.16% | ||
More | ||||
MCHS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHS has been loosely correlated with BZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCHS jumps, then BZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCHS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCHS | 100% | -0.43% | ||
| BZ - MCHS | 41% Loosely correlated | +1.11% | ||
| YMM - MCHS | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.73% | ||
| ACMR - MCHS | 32% Poorly correlated | +2.24% | ||
| ZH - MCHS | 27% Poorly correlated | -1.23% | ||
| ATAT - MCHS | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.71% |