Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CQQQ vs MCHS
CQQQ vs MCHS Comparison
Open Charts CQQQ vs MCHS
Invesco China Technology ETF
Price$55.03
Change+$0.69 (+1.27%)
Volume$1.34M
Net Assets2.89B
Matthews China Discovery Active ETF
Price$33.44
Change+$0.40 (+1.21%)
Volume$128
Net Assets2.62M
CQQQ vs MCHS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CQQQ vs. MCHS commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQQQ is a Hold and MCHS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CQQQ has more net assets: 2.89B vs. MCHS (2.62M). CQQQ has a higher annual dividend yield than MCHS: CQQQ (39.741) vs MCHS (31.288). CQQQ was incepted earlier than MCHS: CQQQ (16 years) vs MCHS (2 years). CQQQ (0.65) has a lower expense ratio than MCHS (0.89). MCHS has a higher turnover CQQQ (43.00) vs CQQQ (43.00).
| CQQQ | MCHS | CQQQ / MCHS | |
| Gain YTD | 39.741 | 31.288 | 127% |
| Net Assets | 2.89B | 2.62M | 110,225% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.89 | 73% |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 115.31 | 37% |
| Yield | 0.19 | 4.04 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CQQQ | MCHS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 43% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 63% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 83% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CQQQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQQQ has been closely correlated with BILI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CQQQ jumps, then BILI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CQQQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CQQQ | 100% | +1.27% | ||
| BILI - CQQQ | 79% Closely correlated | +1.85% | ||
| BIDU - CQQQ | 75% Closely correlated | +1.76% | ||
| ATHM - CQQQ | 68% Closely correlated | +1.05% | ||
| GDS - CQQQ | 63% Loosely correlated | +5.07% | ||
| TME - CQQQ | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.70% | ||
More | ||||
MCHS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHS has been loosely correlated with BZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCHS jumps, then BZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCHS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCHS | 100% | +1.23% | ||
| BZ - MCHS | 44% Loosely correlated | +2.47% | ||
| YMM - MCHS | 37% Loosely correlated | +0.48% | ||
| ACMR - MCHS | 37% Loosely correlated | +4.52% | ||
| ZH - MCHS | 30% Poorly correlated | +2.59% | ||
| ATAT - MCHS | 26% Poorly correlated | +1.34% |