Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CQQQ vs MCHS
CQQQ vs MCHS Comparison
Open Charts CQQQ vs MCHS
CQQQ vs MCHS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CQQQ vs. MCHS commentary
Jul 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQQQ is a Hold and MCHS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CQQQ has more net assets: 3.04B vs. MCHS (19.9M). MCHS has a higher annual dividend yield than CQQQ: MCHS (45.513) vs CQQQ (-4.077). CQQQ was incepted earlier than MCHS: CQQQ (17 years) vs MCHS (3 years). CQQQ (0.65) has a lower expense ratio than MCHS (0.89). MCHS has a higher turnover CQQQ (37.00) vs CQQQ (37.00).
| CQQQ | MCHS | CQQQ / MCHS | |
| Gain YTD | -4.077 | 45.513 | -9% |
| Net Assets | 3.04B | 19.9M | 15,291% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.89 | 73% |
| Turnover | 37.00 | 43.98 | 84% |
| Yield | 1.97 | 2.23 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CQQQ | MCHS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 82% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 64% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 7 days ago 63% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CQQQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQQQ has been closely correlated with BILI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CQQQ jumps, then BILI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CQQQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CQQQ | 100% | -1.03% | ||
| BILI - CQQQ | 79% Closely correlated | -1.89% | ||
| BIDU - CQQQ | 75% Closely correlated | -1.91% | ||
| GDS - CQQQ | 63% Loosely correlated | -2.74% | ||
| TME - CQQQ | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.14% | ||
| KC - CQQQ | 61% Loosely correlated | -2.27% | ||
More | ||||
MCHS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MCHS and ACMR have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCHS and ACMR's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCHS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCHS | 100% | N/A | ||
| ACMR - MCHS | 29% Poorly correlated | -4.64% | ||
| ZH - MCHS | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.32% | ||
| YMM - MCHS | 8% Poorly correlated | +1.54% | ||
| BZ - MCHS | 5% Poorly correlated | +1.11% | ||
| ATAT - MCHS | 4% Poorly correlated | +1.56% |