Advertisement
CRGO vs HUBG
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRGO is a Buy and HUBG is a Buy.
HUBG | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 62 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 23 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 81 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 81 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CRGO | HUBG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 52% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 60% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 62% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 66% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 74% | 26 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 84% | 1 day ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 5 days ago 61% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 67% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CRGO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while HUBG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CRGO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- HUBG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRGO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HUBG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CRGO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
- HUBG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CRGO (@Packaged Software) experienced а -10.37% price change this week, while HUBG (@Other Transportation) price change was -4.90% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.19%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Transportation industry was +0.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was -19.32%.
Reported Earning Dates
CRGO is expected to report earnings on Nov 24, 2026.
HUBG is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (+1.01% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
@Other Transportation (+0.53% weekly)Other Transportation includes transportation services like providing airport ground transportation, airport management and equipment, shipping services, as well as businesses that operate bridges, expressways and other public services such as taxis and subways. Grupo Aero-pac, Corporacion America Airports S.A. and Matson, Inc. are some of the major companies operating in this space.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| XTWO | 48.26 | 0.02 | +0.04% |
| BondBloxx Bloomberg Two Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTWO) | |||
| AIS | 77.51 | -0.10 | -0.13% |
| VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF | |||
| REXC | 15.38 | -0.08 | -0.52% |
| Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF (REXC) | |||
| HIBS | 15.61 | -0.20 | -1.27% |
| Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X ETF (HIBS) | |||
| BRID | 5.34 | -0.17 | -3.09% |
| Bridgford Foods Corp | |||
CRGO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CRGO and PDFS have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CRGO and PDFS's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRGO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRGO | 100% | -6.36% | ||
| PDFS - CRGO | 25% Poorly correlated | +1.05% | ||
| CJMB - CRGO | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.64% | ||
| DUOT - CRGO | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.88% | ||
| XPER - CRGO | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| DAVE - CRGO | 23% Poorly correlated | +6.45% | ||
More | ||||
HUBG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUBG has been closely correlated with XPO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUBG jumps, then XPO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HUBG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUBG | 100% | -3.46% | ||
| XPO - HUBG | 70% Closely correlated | -1.74% | ||
| LSTR - HUBG | 49% Loosely correlated | -1.30% | ||
| JBHT - HUBG | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.90% | ||
| PAL - HUBG | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.84% | ||
| CHRW - HUBG | 38% Loosely correlated | -10.85% | ||
More | ||||