Advertisement
CRSR vs IONQ
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRSR is a StrongBuy and IONQ is a StrongBuy.
| CRSR | IONQ | CRSR / IONQ | |
| Capitalization | 1.47B | 14.9B | 10% |
| EBITDA | 100M | -852.15M | -12% |
| Gain YTD | 127.946 | -18.097 | -707% |
| P/E Ratio | 43.68 | 102.38 | 43% |
| Revenue | 1.45B | 246M | 590% |
| Total Cash | 192M | 2.12B | 9% |
| Total Debt | 185M | 54.5M | 339% |
CRSR | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 21 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 42 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 82 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 92 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CRSR | IONQ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 5 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 84% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CRSR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while IONQ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CRSR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- IONQ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRSR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IONQ’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CRSR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- IONQ’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 8 bearish.
Price Growth
CRSR (@Computer Processing Hardware) experienced а +6.45% price change this week, while IONQ (@Computer Processing Hardware) price change was -7.01% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Processing Hardware industry was -3.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +25.98%.
Reported Earning Dates
CRSR is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2026.
IONQ is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Processing Hardware (-3.63% weekly)Computer Processing Hardware industry produces central processing unit, monitor, keyboard, computer data storage devices, and graphics card. Business activity and economic growth are potential drivers of this industry – if more businesses are growing or flourishing, so would their investments in computer equipment. Dell Technologies, Inc, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co., NCR Corporation are key producers of computer processing hardware.
Advertisement
CRSR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRSR has been loosely correlated with NTAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CRSR jumps, then NTAP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRSR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRSR | 100% | +7.72% | ||
| NTAP - CRSR | 41% Loosely correlated | +8.54% | ||
| SSYS - CRSR | 39% Loosely correlated | +1.98% | ||
| HPQ - CRSR | 38% Loosely correlated | +8.40% | ||
| LOGI - CRSR | 37% Loosely correlated | +2.94% | ||
| IONQ - CRSR | 36% Loosely correlated | -0.24% | ||
More | ||||
IONQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IONQ has been closely correlated with QUBT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IONQ jumps, then QUBT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IONQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IONQ | 100% | -0.24% | ||
| QUBT - IONQ | 77% Closely correlated | +2.17% | ||
| UMAC - IONQ | 55% Loosely correlated | -2.46% | ||
| QMCO - IONQ | 48% Loosely correlated | +2.39% | ||
| OSS - IONQ | 44% Loosely correlated | +3.14% | ||
| CAN - IONQ | 44% Loosely correlated | +9.04% | ||
More | ||||