Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CRTC vs SMH
CRTC vs SMH Comparison
Open Charts CRTC vs SMH
CRTC vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CRTC vs. SMH commentary
Jun 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRTC is a Buy and SMH is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 71.9B vs. CRTC (127M). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than CRTC: SMH (79.685) vs CRTC (7.014). CRTC was incepted earlier than SMH: CRTC (3 years) vs SMH (14 years). CRTC (0.35) and SMH (0.35) have comparable expense ratios . CRTC has a higher turnover SMH (12.00) vs SMH (12.00).
| CRTC | SMH | CRTC / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | 7.014 | 79.685 | 9% |
| Net Assets | 127M | 71.9B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.35 | 100% |
| Turnover | 29.00 | 12.00 | 242% |
| Yield | 0.99 | 0.18 | 539% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CRTC | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 57% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 62% | 6 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EWC | 58.93 | 0.45 | +0.76% |
| iShares MSCI Canada ETF | |||
| HYBI | 49.29 | 0.10 | +0.20% |
| NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF | |||
| STPZ | 53.49 | 0.04 | +0.07% |
| PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF | |||
| RIFR | 28.53 | -0.17 | -0.59% |
| Russell Inv Global Infrastructure ETF | |||
| BMVP | 51.93 | -0.37 | -0.70% |
| Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF | |||
CRTC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRTC has been loosely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CRTC jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRTC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRTC | 100% | +1.40% | ||
| NVDA - CRTC | 63% Loosely correlated | +3.54% | ||
| LRCX - CRTC | 62% Loosely correlated | +6.03% | ||
| TRMB - CRTC | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.42% | ||
| EMR - CRTC | 60% Loosely correlated | +2.41% | ||
| CDNS - CRTC | 60% Loosely correlated | +2.48% | ||
More | ||||
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | +4.38% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 86% Closely correlated | +6.03% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 83% Closely correlated | +3.27% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 83% Closely correlated | +0.74% | ||
| ASML - SMH | 80% Closely correlated | +1.56% | ||
| TSM - SMH | 80% Closely correlated | +4.12% | ||
More | ||||