CSWC
Price
$23.69
Change
+$0.15 (+0.64%)
Updated
Jun 10, 12:23 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.46B
61 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GBDC
Price
$13.21
Change
+$0.12 (+0.92%)
Updated
Jun 10, 12:55 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.41B
61 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSWC vs GBDC

Header iconCSWC vs GBDC Comparison
Open Charts CSWC vs GBDCBanner chart's image
CSWC vs GBDC Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSWC vs. GBDC commentary
Jun 10, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSWC is a StrongBuy and GBDC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 10, 2026
Stock price -- (CSWC: $23.54 vs. GBDC: $13.10)
Brand notoriety: CSWC and GBDC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSWC: 96% vs. GBDC: 44%
Market capitalization -- CSWC: $1.46B vs. GBDC: $3.41B
CSWC [@Investment Managers] is valued at $1.46B. GBDC’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $3.41B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $157.09B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $9.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSWC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGBDC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CSWC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GBDC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, GBDC is a better buy in the long-term than CSWC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSWC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GBDC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CSWC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • GBDC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CSWC is a better buy in the short-term than GBDC.

Price Growth

CSWC (@Investment Managers) experienced а -0.25% price change this week, while GBDC (@Investment Managers) price change was -1.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.94%.

Reported Earning Dates

CSWC is expected to report earnings on Aug 10, 2026.

GBDC is expected to report earnings on Aug 10, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.68% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GBDC($3.41B) has a higher market cap than CSWC($1.46B). GBDC has higher P/E ratio than CSWC: GBDC (17.01) vs CSWC (12.39). CSWC YTD gains are higher at: 11.135 vs. GBDC (-0.764). CSWC has less debt than GBDC: CSWC (1.13B) vs GBDC (4.7B). GBDC has higher revenues than CSWC: GBDC (236M) vs CSWC (151M).
CSWCGBDCCSWC / GBDC
Capitalization1.46B3.41B43%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD11.135-0.764-1,458%
P/E Ratio12.3917.0173%
Revenue151M236M64%
Total CashN/A68.1M-
Total Debt1.13B4.7B24%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CSWC vs GBDC: Fundamental Ratings
CSWC
GBDC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1571
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2630
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4753
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6832
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3350

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GBDC's Valuation (4) in the null industry is in the same range as CSWC (16) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that GBDC’s stock grew similarly to CSWC’s over the last 12 months.

CSWC's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as GBDC (30) in the null industry. This means that CSWC’s stock grew similarly to GBDC’s over the last 12 months.

CSWC's SMR Rating (100) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as GBDC (100) in the null industry. This means that CSWC’s stock grew similarly to GBDC’s over the last 12 months.

CSWC's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as GBDC (53) in the null industry. This means that CSWC’s stock grew similarly to GBDC’s over the last 12 months.

GBDC's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CSWC (68) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that GBDC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CSWC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSWCGBDC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
32%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
40%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
33%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
33%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
32%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
30%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
34%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
41%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CSWC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GBDC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DEM54.300.27
+0.50%
WisdomTree Emerging Markets High Div ETF
GDO10.65N/A
N/A
Western Asset Global Corporate Opportunity Fund Inc
FOXY28.95-0.03
-0.10%
Simplify Currency Strategy ETF
FGDL56.61-1.07
-1.86%
Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF
PDCC9.58-0.41
-4.15%
Pearl Diver Credit Company Inc.

CSWC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSWC has been closely correlated with SLRC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CSWC jumps, then SLRC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSWC
1D Price
Change %
CSWC100%
+1.12%
SLRC - CSWC
77%
Closely correlated
+1.26%
ARCC - CSWC
71%
Closely correlated
+1.39%
PFLT - CSWC
69%
Closely correlated
+1.00%
PNNT - CSWC
67%
Closely correlated
-0.52%
MAIN - CSWC
67%
Closely correlated
-0.02%
More

GBDC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GBDC has been closely correlated with ARCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GBDC jumps, then ARCC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GBDC
1D Price
Change %
GBDC100%
+0.46%
ARCC - GBDC
78%
Closely correlated
+1.39%
OBDC - GBDC
74%
Closely correlated
+1.64%
BXSL - GBDC
70%
Closely correlated
+2.39%
TSLX - GBDC
69%
Closely correlated
+0.41%
PFLT - GBDC
68%
Closely correlated
+1.00%
More