CSWC
Price
$20.13
Change
+$0.17 (+0.85%)
Updated
Apr 25, 02:22 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.07B
19 days until earnings call
PFLT
Price
$10.09
Change
+$0.12 (+1.20%)
Updated
Apr 25, 02:43 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
690.23M
17 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CSWC vs PFLT

Header iconCSWC vs PFLT Comparison
Open Charts CSWC vs PFLTBanner chart's image
Capital Southwest
Price$20.13
Change+$0.17 (+0.85%)
Volume$550
Capitalization1.07B
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital
Price$10.09
Change+$0.12 (+1.20%)
Volume$495
Capitalization690.23M
CSWC vs PFLT Comparison Chart
Loading...
CSWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PFLT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSWC vs. PFLT commentary
Apr 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSWC is a Buy and PFLT is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 25, 2025
Stock price -- (CSWC: $19.96 vs. PFLT: $9.97)
Brand notoriety: CSWC and PFLT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSWC: 62% vs. PFLT: 46%
Market capitalization -- CSWC: $1.07B vs. PFLT: $690.23M
CSWC [@Investment Managers] is valued at $1.07B. PFLT’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $690.23M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSWC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePFLT’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CSWC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • PFLT’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CSWC and PFLT are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSWC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PFLT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CSWC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PFLT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CSWC and PFLT are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CSWC (@Investment Managers) experienced а +1.42% price change this week, while PFLT (@Investment Managers) price change was +2.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +1.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.58%.

Reported Earning Dates

CSWC is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2025.

PFLT is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+1.95% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSWC($1.07B) has a higher market cap than PFLT($690M). CSWC has higher P/E ratio than PFLT: CSWC (10.56) vs PFLT (9.41). PFLT YTD gains are higher at: -5.189 vs. CSWC (-5.756). PFLT (671M) and CSWC (678M) have identical debt. CSWC has higher revenues than PFLT: CSWC (114M) vs PFLT (65.9M).
CSWCPFLTCSWC / PFLT
Capitalization1.07B690M156%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-5.756-5.189111%
P/E Ratio10.569.41112%
Revenue114M65.9M173%
Total CashN/A15.1M-
Total Debt678M671M101%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CSWC vs PFLT: Fundamental Ratings
CSWC
PFLT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
175
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1712
SMR RATING
1..100
1212
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7775
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2076
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PFLT's Valuation (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CSWC (98) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that PFLT’s stock grew significantly faster than CSWC’s over the last 12 months.

PFLT's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as CSWC (17) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that PFLT’s stock grew similarly to CSWC’s over the last 12 months.

PFLT's SMR Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as CSWC (12) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that PFLT’s stock grew similarly to CSWC’s over the last 12 months.

PFLT's Price Growth Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as CSWC (77) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that PFLT’s stock grew similarly to CSWC’s over the last 12 months.

CSWC's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PFLT (76) in the null industry. This means that CSWC’s stock grew somewhat faster than PFLT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSWCPFLT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
42%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CSWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PFLT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TIBAX27.460.23
+0.84%
Thornburg Investment Income Builder A
TRPWX19.09N/A
N/A
Nuveen Quant Mid Cap Growth R6
BGVIX30.45N/A
N/A
Brandes Global Equity I
ARAIX60.81N/A
N/A
Ariel Fund Institutional
FSCWX28.88N/A
N/A
Nuveen Small Cap Value R6

CSWC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSWC has been closely correlated with MAIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CSWC jumps, then MAIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSWC
1D Price
Change %
CSWC100%
+1.58%
MAIN - CSWC
77%
Closely correlated
+1.85%
ARCC - CSWC
75%
Closely correlated
+1.69%
NMFC - CSWC
73%
Closely correlated
+2.33%
FDUS - CSWC
73%
Closely correlated
+0.90%
GLAD - CSWC
72%
Closely correlated
+1.73%
More

PFLT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PFLT has been closely correlated with FDUS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PFLT jumps, then FDUS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PFLT
1D Price
Change %
PFLT100%
+1.84%
FDUS - PFLT
76%
Closely correlated
+0.90%
CSWC - PFLT
75%
Closely correlated
+1.58%
NMFC - PFLT
74%
Closely correlated
+2.33%
GBDC - PFLT
72%
Closely correlated
+0.84%
GLAD - PFLT
72%
Closely correlated
+1.73%
More