ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM) and Verisk Analytics, Inc. (VRSK) represent distinct approaches within the industrials sector, with ABM focusing on facility services and VRSK on insurance analytics. This stock comparison analyzes their recent market positioning, performance trends, and key drivers amid evolving economic conditions. Traders seeking diversified exposure to industrials or investors evaluating value versus growth profiles will find insights into relative strengths, risks, and sentiment shifts. By examining verifiable metrics and developments from recent market activity, the article aids informed decision-making in today's volatile environment.
ABM Industries Incorporated provides integrated facility solutions, including janitorial, engineering, parking, and aviation services across business, manufacturing, education, and technical segments. Headquartered in New York, the company serves commercial real estate, data centers, schools, and airports. In recent weeks, ABM stock has traded around $41, up modestly from recent lows, with a market cap of approximately $2.4 billion. Year-to-date performance hovers near flat, down slightly by 2%, within a 52-week range of $37 to $53. Sentiment has improved due to recent accolades, such as an Edison Award for innovation and top sustainability certification from ISSA. Analyst Maxim upgraded to Buy citing data center exposure, though UBS lowered its target slightly. Post-earnings, shares dipped but have stabilized, supported by a low beta of 0.73 and forward P/E (forward price-to-earnings ratio) of 9.13, reflecting steady demand for essential services.
Verisk Analytics, Inc. delivers data analytics and risk assessment solutions primarily to the insurance sector, covering underwriting, claims, catastrophe modeling, and fraud detection. Based in Jersey City, New Jersey, it supports property, casualty, life insurance, and international markets. Recently, VRSK shares have hovered near $178, with a market cap of about $23.2 billion, down significantly from 52-week highs above $320. Year-to-date returns stand at approximately -20%, with one-year declines around -38%. Trading volume remains moderate, and beta is 0.82. Key influences include anticipation for Q1 2026 earnings on April 29, expected to show revenue growth, alongside partnerships like Roofr for estimates and AI-related board additions. High debt-to-equity (1,582%) and concentrated risks have pressured performance, though analysts maintain a positive outlook with subscription revenues providing resilience.
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates 25 top-performing AI trading bots from over 350 available, selected by AI for their suitability in current market volatility. These bots employ diverse strategies, including trend trading, multi-agent systems, and corridor take-profit/stop-loss exits, across timeframes from 1 day to 55 days. Performance highlights include annualized returns ranging from +15% to +168%, win rates of 48% to 88%, and profit factors up to 11.7. They trade thousands of tickers in sectors like semiconductors, aerospace, financials, and ETFs, with profit-to-drawdown ratios reaching 21.5. Traders can explore AI Trading Signal Agents for real-time alerts or Virtual Agents with risk management. Visit the page to discover bots aligned with prevailing conditions and enhance your strategy.
ABM's business model centers on labor-intensive facility services with recurring contracts, contrasting VRSK's asset-light, subscription-based analytics platform. Growth drivers differ: ABM benefits from data center and aviation demand, while VRSK leverages AI and catastrophe modeling amid rising insurance needs. Recent momentum favors ABM's stability post-earnings recovery versus VRSK's downtrend from highs. Risk factors include ABM's union and margin pressures (debt/equity ~101%, ROE (return on equity) 9%) and VRSK's elevated leverage (debt/equity 1,582%, ROE 438%). Both share industrials exposure but ABM's specialty services offer defensiveness, while VRSK's consulting ties to cyclical insurance. Market sentiment tilts toward ABM's value (P/S 0.27 vs. VRSK's 8.09) amid broader caution on high-valuation tech-adjacent plays.
Tickeron's AI currently favors ABM over VRSK based on superior trend consistency, lower volatility, attractive forward valuation, and positive catalysts like recent awards and upgrades. ABM's relative stability and positioning in essential services provide a probabilistic edge in the near term, though VRSK could rebound post-earnings if growth beats expectations. Observable factors suggest higher confidence in ABM's momentum continuation.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ABM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVRSK’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ABM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VRSK’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
ABM (@Office Equipment/Supplies) experienced а -0.32% price change this week, while VRSK (@Data Processing Services) price change was -6.32% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was -1.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.24%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Data Processing Services industry was -0.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.95%.
ABM is expected to report earnings on Sep 04, 2026.
VRSK is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.
@Data Processing Services (-0.31% weekly)The industry involves capturing raw data from various sources, extracting meaningful information from it and presenting it in a more accessible digital format. Many people would agree that data is the new gold, which makes data processing services all the more relevant for businesses’ strategic decisions. PayPal Holdings Inc., Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. and Automatic Data Processing, Inc. some of the big players in his burgeoning industry.
| ABM | VRSK | ABM / VRSK | |
| Capitalization | 2.57B | 22.1B | 12% |
| EBITDA | 428M | 1.69B | 25% |
| Gain YTD | 5.160 | -24.029 | -21% |
| P/E Ratio | 16.87 | 25.77 | 65% |
| Revenue | 9.05B | 3.1B | 292% |
| Total Cash | 94.9M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 1.97B | 4.63B | 43% |
ABM | VRSK | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 80 | 53 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 9 Undervalued | 17 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 98 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 83 | 6 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 93 | 89 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ABM's Valuation (9) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as VRSK (17) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry. This means that ABM’s stock grew similarly to VRSK’s over the last 12 months.
VRSK's Profit vs Risk Rating (98) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry is in the same range as ABM (100) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that VRSK’s stock grew similarly to ABM’s over the last 12 months.
VRSK's SMR Rating (6) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for ABM (83) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that VRSK’s stock grew significantly faster than ABM’s over the last 12 months.
ABM's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as VRSK (63) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry. This means that ABM’s stock grew similarly to VRSK’s over the last 12 months.
VRSK's P/E Growth Rating (89) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry is in the same range as ABM (93) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that VRSK’s stock grew similarly to ABM’s over the last 12 months.
| ABM | VRSK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 56% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 43% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 54% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 58% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 68% | 14 days ago 50% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 54% | 1 day ago 51% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 56% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 54% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VRSK has been loosely correlated with EXPO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VRSK jumps, then EXPO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VRSK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VRSK | 100% | -2.73% | ||
| EXPO - VRSK | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.86% | ||
| TRI - VRSK | 46% Loosely correlated | -2.58% | ||
| CTAS - VRSK | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.82% | ||
| ABM - VRSK | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.66% | ||
| RELX - VRSK | 44% Loosely correlated | -1.12% | ||
More | ||||