Community Trust Bancorp (CTBI) and Nicolet Bankshares (NIC) are two well-regarded regional bank holding companies that have drawn attention from investors seeking exposure to the U.S. community banking sector. Both institutions recently reported record annual earnings, reflecting the benefits of a favorable interest rate environment and disciplined credit management. Yet their strategies, geographic footprints, and market valuations differ meaningfully. CTBI, headquartered in Pikeville, Kentucky, emphasizes organic loan growth across Appalachia and a multi-decade dividend track record. NIC, based in Green Bay, Wisconsin, combines robust organic performance with an active acquisition strategy across the Upper Midwest. This comparison is particularly relevant for investors evaluating whether to prioritize value and income or growth and scale within the regional banking space.
Community Trust Bancorp, Inc. (CTBI), founded in 1903, serves as the holding company for Community Trust Bank and operates primarily across eastern, northeastern, central, and south-central Kentucky, as well as southern West Virginia and northeastern Tennessee. Its business spans commercial and personal banking, mortgage lending, trust and wealth management, and securities brokerage services. In recent market activity, CTBI shares have demonstrated notable strength, rising over 37% year to date and approximately 41% over the trailing twelve months. The company reported record full-year 2025 earnings of $98.1 million, or $5.43 per diluted share, representing an 18% increase over 2024. Net interest income reached $219 million for the year, while the net interest margin expanded 24 basis points, aided by disciplined loan pricing and a stable deposit base. CTBI's loan portfolio grew 9.1% year over year to $4.9 billion, and total deposits increased 7.3% to $5.7 billion. Credit quality remained healthy, with net charge-offs at an annualized 0.14% of average loans and nonperforming assets declining to $22.2 million. The bank maintains a tangible common equity ratio of 11.94% and has raised its dividend for 44 consecutive years, underscoring its commitment to shareholder returns.
Nicolet Bankshares, Inc. (NIC), incorporated in 2000 and headquartered in Green Bay, Wisconsin, is the bank holding company for Nicolet National Bank. It provides a full suite of commercial and retail banking services to businesses and individuals across Wisconsin, Michigan, and Minnesota, complemented by wealth management and retirement plan services. NIC has delivered impressive stock performance in recent months, gaining over 40% year to date and approximately 29% over the trailing one-year period. The company reported record net income of $151 million for full-year 2025, or $9.78 per diluted common share, a 21.5% increase over 2024. Its net interest margin improved to 3.76%, expanding 29 basis points from the prior year, while its return on average assets reached 1.68%. Core deposit growth was exceptional at $497 million (7%) year over year, and total deposits stood at $7.7 billion as of year-end. Total assets reached $9.2 billion. A notable strategic development in recent months is the anticipated closing of NIC's acquisition of MidWestOne, a transaction that management describes as "melding two similar cultures and geographies." The company has also actively repurchased shares, signaling confidence in its intrinsic value. Nonperforming assets remain low at 0.35% of total assets.
For traders seeking a data-driven edge in comparing stocks like CTBI and NIC, Tickeron offers a dedicated Trending AI Robots section. This curated space showcases only the top-performing AI trading bots from a much larger pool — Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI-powered trading bots that collectively monitor thousands of tickers across diverse market conditions. These bots vary widely in trading style, strategy, timeframe, performance metrics, and the specific sets of tickers they trade. Only those demonstrating consistently strong, market-adapted results earn placement among the Trending AI Robots. Some bots in the broader Tickeron ecosystem have historically delivered annualized returns ranging from the mid-teens to well above 30%, depending on strategy and market regime. This curated selection helps traders quickly identify which AI strategies are best aligned with current conditions, whether they favor momentum, value rotation, or sector-specific plays.
When comparing CTBI and NIC across fundamental dimensions, several contrasts emerge. Scale and market reach: NIC is meaningfully larger, with roughly $9.2 billion in total assets and a market capitalization near $3.6 billion, compared to CTBI's $6.6 billion in assets and $1.4 billion market cap. NIC also generates higher total revenue — approximately $557 million versus CTBI's $408 million in 2025. Growth strategy: CTBI has pursued largely organic loan growth within its established Appalachian footprint, while NIC supplements organic expansion with a deliberate M&A strategy, evidenced by the pending MidWestOne acquisition — which introduces both upside potential and integration execution risk. Profitability and efficiency: NIC's net interest margin of 3.76% outpaces CTBI's, and its ROA of 1.68% edges above CTBI's 1.53%. However, CTBI's efficiency ratio of 50.48% reflects tighter cost control than many peers. Valuation: CTBI trades at a P/E ratio near 12.4, notably cheaper than NIC's P/E of approximately 19.0, reflecting the market's willingness to pay a premium for NIC's growth trajectory. Income appeal: CTBI's dividend yield near 3.2% and 44-year streak of consecutive increases far exceed NIC's roughly 0.9% yield. Risk profile: Both banks exhibit strong asset quality, but NIC's acquisition-driven model carries higher goodwill and intangible asset balances on its balance sheet, a consideration if integration results disappoint. CTBI's conservative, community-rooted model offers lower execution complexity but may face geographic concentration risk in Appalachia.
Based on observable trend consistency, relative momentum, and fundamental positioning, Tickeron's AI framework would likely tilt in favor of NIC under current market conditions. NIC has generated more bullish technical signals, higher net interest margin expansion, and stronger earnings-per-share growth momentum than CTBI in the recent period. Its larger scale, active M&A strategy, and expanding footprint across the Upper Midwest provide multiple catalysts that quantitative models tend to reward. That said, the AI assessment is probabilistic rather than absolute — CTBI's valuation discount, superior dividend profile, and 44-year track record of returning capital to shareholders present a compelling case for defensive and income-oriented positioning. The outcome depends substantially on whether an investor's model prioritizes growth momentum or value stability, and the AI's preference reflects the current balance of observable data rather than a permanent judgment.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CTBI’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNIC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CTBI’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NIC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
CTBI (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.94% price change this week, while NIC (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.46% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.94%.
CTBI is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2026.
NIC is expected to report earnings on Oct 20, 2026.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| CTBI | NIC | CTBI / NIC | |
| Capitalization | 1.44B | 3.73B | 38% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 42.346 | 47.563 | 89% |
| P/E Ratio | 13.24 | 19.97 | 66% |
| Revenue | 291M | 519M | 56% |
| Total Cash | 91.6M | 123M | 74% |
| Total Debt | 80M | 92.8M | 86% |
CTBI | NIC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 89 | 84 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 53 Fair valued | 89 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 8 | 14 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 48 | 45 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 28 | 24 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CTBI's Valuation (53) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NIC (89). This means that CTBI’s stock grew somewhat faster than NIC’s over the last 12 months.
CTBI's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NIC (14). This means that CTBI’s stock grew similarly to NIC’s over the last 12 months.
NIC's SMR Rating (45) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CTBI (48). This means that NIC’s stock grew similarly to CTBI’s over the last 12 months.
CTBI's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NIC (42). This means that CTBI’s stock grew similarly to NIC’s over the last 12 months.
NIC's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CTBI (28). This means that NIC’s stock grew similarly to CTBI’s over the last 12 months.
| CTBI | NIC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 41% | 2 days ago 46% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 38% | 2 days ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 58% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 50% | 8 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 49% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 43% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| NFLP | 19.25 | 1.23 | +6.83% |
| Kurv Yield Premium Str Netflix ETF | |||
| XYZY | 26.19 | 1.17 | +4.70% |
| YieldMax XYZ Option Income Strategy ETF | |||
| SPYU | 37.49 | 0.96 | +2.63% |
| MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN | |||
| DSI | 148.36 | 1.08 | +0.73% |
| iShares ESG MSCI KLD 400 ETF | |||
| MMTM | 310.41 | 1.74 | +0.56% |
| State Street® SPDR® S&P® 1500MomtTiltETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CTBI has been closely correlated with THFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CTBI jumps, then THFF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CTBI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTBI | 100% | +1.02% | ||
| THFF - CTBI | 84% Closely correlated | +0.52% | ||
| UBSI - CTBI | 84% Closely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| PEBO - CTBI | 83% Closely correlated | +0.34% | ||
| UVSP - CTBI | 83% Closely correlated | +0.09% | ||
| FMBH - CTBI | 83% Closely correlated | +0.48% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NIC has been closely correlated with WSBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NIC jumps, then WSBC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NIC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NIC | 100% | +0.42% | ||
| WSBC - NIC | 80% Closely correlated | +0.73% | ||
| CTBI - NIC | 76% Closely correlated | +1.02% | ||
| EFSC - NIC | 75% Closely correlated | -0.17% | ||
| BUSE - NIC | 75% Closely correlated | -0.26% | ||
| MBWM - NIC | 75% Closely correlated | +0.15% | ||
More | ||||