Advertisement
CTBI vs EFSC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTBI is a Hold and EFSC is a Hold.
| CTBI | EFSC | CTBI / EFSC | |
| Capitalization | 1.38B | 2.23B | 62% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 37.882 | 16.021 | 236% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.71 | 12.25 | 104% |
| Revenue | 299M | 643M | 47% |
| Total Cash | 91.6M | 259M | 35% |
| Total Debt | 79.9M | 682M | 12% |
CTBI | EFSC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 53 Fair valued | 49 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 8 | 46 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 25 | 15 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 29 | 33 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 41 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EFSC's Valuation (49) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CTBI (53). This means that EFSC’s stock grew similarly to CTBI’s over the last 12 months.
CTBI's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EFSC (46). This means that CTBI’s stock grew somewhat faster than EFSC’s over the last 12 months.
EFSC's SMR Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CTBI (25). This means that EFSC’s stock grew similarly to CTBI’s over the last 12 months.
CTBI's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EFSC (50). This means that CTBI’s stock grew similarly to EFSC’s over the last 12 months.
CTBI's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EFSC (33). This means that CTBI’s stock grew similarly to EFSC’s over the last 12 months.
| CTBI | EFSC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 44% | 3 days ago 53% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 42% | 3 days ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 39% | 3 days ago 64% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 49% | 3 days ago 62% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 47% | 3 days ago 58% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 56% | 7 days ago 57% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 49% | 5 days ago 62% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 45% | 3 days ago 59% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CTBI’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green while EFSC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- CTBI’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- EFSC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CTBI’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EFSC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CTBI’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
- EFSC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CTBI (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.34% price change this week, while EFSC (@Regional Banks) price change was -3.42% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.92%.
Reported Earning Dates
CTBI is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2026.
EFSC is expected to report earnings on Oct 26, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (-1.03% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| IQM | 107.03 | 2.08 | +1.98% |
| Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM) | |||
| WAGN | 15.12 | 0.09 | +0.60% |
| Pabrai Wagons ETF (WAGN) | |||
| MHNC | 10.75 | N/A | N/A |
| MAIDEN HOLDINGS NORTH AMERICA Ltd | |||
| DTAN | 33.17 | -0.05 | -0.15% |
| Sparkline International Intangible Value ETF (DTAN) | |||
| IYZ | 41.91 | -0.17 | -0.40% |
| iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF (IYZ) | |||
CTBI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CTBI has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CTBI jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CTBI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTBI | 100% | -0.34% | ||
| UBSI - CTBI | 84% Closely correlated | +0.19% | ||
| THFF - CTBI | 84% Closely correlated | -0.70% | ||
| FMBH - CTBI | 83% Closely correlated | -0.26% | ||
| EFSC - CTBI | 83% Closely correlated | -0.87% | ||
| PEBO - CTBI | 82% Closely correlated | -0.23% | ||
More | ||||
EFSC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFSC has been closely correlated with BUSE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EFSC jumps, then BUSE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EFSC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EFSC | 100% | -0.87% | ||
| BUSE - EFSC | 86% Closely correlated | +0.56% | ||
| FRME - EFSC | 86% Closely correlated | -0.07% | ||
| BY - EFSC | 85% Closely correlated | -0.24% | ||
| THFF - EFSC | 85% Closely correlated | -0.70% | ||
| SRCE - EFSC | 85% Closely correlated | +0.13% | ||
More | ||||