CTGO
Price
$15.88
Change
-$0.94 (-5.59%)
Updated
Jul 16, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
543.95M
34 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FSM
Price
$8.23
Change
-$0.25 (-2.95%)
Updated
Jul 16, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.54B
27 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTGO vs FSM

CTGO vs FSM Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTGO vs. FSM commentary
Jul 17, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTGO is a Hold and FSM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 17, 2026
Stock price -- (CTGO: $16.82 vs. FSM: $8.48)
Brand notoriety: CTGO and FSM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTGO: 43% vs. FSM: 92%
Market capitalization -- CTGO: $543.95M vs. FSM: $2.54B
CTGO [@Precious Metals] is valued at $543.95M. FSM’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $2.54B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $134.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $10.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTGO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFSM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CTGO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FSM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FSM is a better buy in the long-term than CTGO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CTGO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FSM’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CTGO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FSM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FSM is a better buy in the short-term than CTGO.

Price Growth

CTGO (@Precious Metals) experienced а +7.07% price change this week, while FSM (@Precious Metals) price change was +4.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -8.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -20.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was -27.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

CTGO is expected to report earnings on Aug 19, 2026.

FSM is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-8.10% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSM($2.54B) has a higher market cap than CTGO($544M). CTGO has higher P/E ratio than FSM: CTGO (103.26) vs FSM (7.85). FSM YTD gains are higher at: -13.558 vs. CTGO (-36.312). FSM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 743M vs. CTGO (-21.87M). FSM has more cash in the bank: 676M vs. CTGO (97.5M). CTGO has less debt than FSM: CTGO (33M) vs FSM (209M). FSM has higher revenues than CTGO: FSM (1.09B) vs CTGO (0).
CTGOFSMCTGO / FSM
Capitalization544M2.54B21%
EBITDA-21.87M743M-3%
Gain YTD-36.312-13.558268%
P/E Ratio103.267.851,315%
Revenue01.09B-
Total Cash97.5M676M14%
Total Debt33M209M16%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTGO vs FSM: Fundamental Ratings
CTGO
FSM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7360
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10076
SMR RATING
1..100
9744
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6460
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6288
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8525

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSM's Valuation (51) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as CTGO (65) in the null industry. This means that FSM’s stock grew similarly to CTGO’s over the last 12 months.

FSM's Profit vs Risk Rating (76) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as CTGO (100) in the null industry. This means that FSM’s stock grew similarly to CTGO’s over the last 12 months.

FSM's SMR Rating (44) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTGO (97) in the null industry. This means that FSM’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTGO’s over the last 12 months.

FSM's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as CTGO (64) in the null industry. This means that FSM’s stock grew similarly to CTGO’s over the last 12 months.

CTGO's P/E Growth Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as FSM (88) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that CTGO’s stock grew similarly to FSM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTGOFSM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CTGO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FSM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BCCC12.020.05
+0.45%
Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF
XUDV32.200.09
+0.28%
Franklin U.S. Dividend Mltplr Idx ETF
HRTS36.65N/A
N/A
Tema Heart & Health ETF
ITM46.65-0.01
-0.01%
VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF
DSM6.07-0.01
-0.16%
BNY Mellon Strategic Municipal

CTGO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CTGO has been closely correlated with WPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CTGO jumps, then WPM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTGO
1D Price
Change %
CTGO100%
-1.69%
WPM - CTGO
70%
Closely correlated
+0.04%
IAG - CTGO
69%
Closely correlated
N/A
PAAS - CTGO
69%
Closely correlated
+0.14%
FSM - CTGO
68%
Closely correlated
-0.35%
AEM - CTGO
68%
Closely correlated
-1.51%
More

FSM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSM has been closely correlated with WPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FSM jumps, then WPM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSM
1D Price
Change %
FSM100%
-0.35%
WPM - FSM
82%
Closely correlated
+0.04%
AEM - FSM
82%
Closely correlated
-1.51%
PAAS - FSM
82%
Closely correlated
+0.14%
KGC - FSM
81%
Closely correlated
-1.05%
IAG - FSM
80%
Closely correlated
N/A
More