Corteva (CTVA) and Nutrien (NTR) operate in the agriculture sector, with CTVA focusing on seeds and crop protection and NTR emphasizing fertilizers and crop nutrients. This comparison is relevant for investors tracking agribusiness amid volatile commodity prices, geopolitical influences on supply chains, and sector tailwinds from global food demand. Traders seeking relative performance insights in a market favoring value and momentum plays will find value here, as both stocks have shown resilience with year-to-date gains exceeding 20%.
Corteva (CTVA), a leader in seed technology and crop protection products, has navigated recent market activity with a stock price around $81, within a 52-week range of $60.53 to $85.63. The company boasts a market capitalization of $54.3 billion and a trailing P/E (price-to-earnings) ratio of 46.2. In recent weeks, shares have risen over 30% in the past year, driven by strategic board refreshments and announcements of a planned split into two entities, targeting $19.2 billion in revenue by 2029. Sentiment reflects mixed analyst views on valuation amid margin pressures, though rising fertilizer costs indirectly bolster crop input demand. Year-to-date performance stands at 20.9%, with weekly gains offsetting minor monthly pullbacks.
Nutrien (NTR), the world's largest provider of potash fertilizers alongside nitrogen and phosphate production, trades near $75, in a 52-week range of $53.03 to $85.36, with a $36.2 billion market cap and P/E of 16.1. Recent market activity has seen year-to-date returns of 21.3% and one-year gains of 34.8%, fueled by solid Q4 2025 results, dividend increases, and buybacks despite earnings slightly missing estimates. Analyst upgrades, including from Oppenheimer, highlight resilient agriculture sentiment and potential nitrogen business boosts from Middle East tensions elevating fertilizer prices. Positioning ahead of Q1 earnings on May 6 underscores steady momentum.
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates 25 top-performing AI trading bots from a library of 351, selected for their ability to adapt to current market conditions across diverse sectors like semiconductors, industrials, and gold miners. These bots employ varied strategies—trend following, swing trading, multi-agent systems—with timeframes from 5 minutes to 60 minutes and tickers ranging from 1 to 18 per bot. Standout stats include annualized returns up to +163%, win rates of 51% to 88%, and profit factors reaching 11.7, with profit-to-drawdown ratios as high as 17. Each bot's unique performance metrics and ticker sets offer tailored approaches for different risk profiles. Explore these bots to enhance your trading edge in today's dynamic markets.
CTVA emphasizes innovation in seeds and crop protection, contrasting NTR's focus on fertilizer production and retail distribution, exposing NTR more directly to commodity price swings. Growth drivers for CTVA include its planned spin-off enhancing focus, while NTR leverages record potash volumes and nitrogen pricing. Recent momentum favors NTR with superior one-year returns, though CTVA holds a larger scale. Risk factors involve supply chain disruptions for both, with CTVA's higher P/E suggesting premium pricing versus NTR's value appeal. Market sentiment tilts toward fertilizer beneficiaries amid geopolitical risks, balancing sector exposures.
Tickeron's AI models currently lean toward NTR due to its attractive valuation, lower P/E relative to peers, consistent momentum, and catalysts like upcoming earnings and fertilizer price tailwinds. While CTVA's restructuring offers long-term potential, NTR exhibits stronger trend stability and sector positioning in the near term, with higher probabilities of outperformance based on recent data patterns.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CTVA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNTR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CTVA’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NTR’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
CTVA (@Chemicals: Agricultural) experienced а -3.67% price change this week, while NTR (@Chemicals: Agricultural) price change was -0.93% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Agricultural industry was -3.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.20%.
CTVA is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
NTR is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
The agricultural chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemical products for the agricultural industry applications like crop protection, animal health, biotechnology and pharmaceutical-related products. Some of the largest agricultural chemicals producers include Nutrien Ltd., Corteva Inc., and FMC Corporation.
| CTVA | NTR | CTVA / NTR | |
| Capitalization | 51.8B | 33.2B | 156% |
| EBITDA | 3.15B | 6.32B | 50% |
| Gain YTD | 16.087 | 12.604 | 128% |
| P/E Ratio | 41.87 | 14.05 | 298% |
| Revenue | 17.9B | 27.8B | 64% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 777M | - |
| Total Debt | 3.36B | 13.9B | 24% |
CTVA | NTR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 67 | 63 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 67 Overvalued | 24 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 34 | 80 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 87 | 73 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 49 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NTR's Valuation (24) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTVA (67) in the null industry. This means that NTR’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTVA’s over the last 12 months.
CTVA's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NTR (80) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that CTVA’s stock grew somewhat faster than NTR’s over the last 12 months.
NTR's SMR Rating (73) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as CTVA (87) in the null industry. This means that NTR’s stock grew similarly to CTVA’s over the last 12 months.
CTVA's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as NTR (56) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that CTVA’s stock grew similarly to NTR’s over the last 12 months.
CTVA's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NTR (99) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that CTVA’s stock grew somewhat faster than NTR’s over the last 12 months.
| CTVA | NTR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 1 day ago 51% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 1 day ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 1 day ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 1 day ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 60% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 9 days ago 65% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 1 day ago 72% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CTVA has been loosely correlated with NTR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CTVA jumps, then NTR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CTVA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTVA | 100% | -0.44% | ||
| NTR - CTVA | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.28% | ||
| MOS - CTVA | 43% Loosely correlated | -1.72% | ||
| IPI - CTVA | 39% Loosely correlated | +2.11% | ||
| FMC - CTVA | 37% Loosely correlated | -1.30% | ||
| CF - CTVA | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.79% | ||
More | ||||