The aerospace and defense sector has been one of the strongest-performing areas of the equity market in recent years, fueled by rising global defense budgets, a multi-year commercial aerospace upcycle, and renewed investment in nuclear energy infrastructure. Two standout companies in this space — Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) and Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM) — have each rewarded shareholders with exceptional returns. While both operate within the same broad industrial ecosystem, their business models, growth drivers, and risk profiles differ in meaningful ways. This stock comparison examines how these two aerospace and defense leaders stack up across key dimensions, helping investors and traders evaluate their relative positioning in today's market.
Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) is a diversified global engineering firm that designs and manufactures highly engineered, mission-critical products for aerospace, defense, and industrial markets. Headquartered in Davidson, North Carolina, the company operates through three segments: Aerospace & Industrial, Defense Electronics, and Naval & Power. Its technologies span flight control actuation systems, sensors, pumps and valves, power conversion equipment, and integrated platform solutions for marine and ground defense applications. Defense-related contracts account for roughly 60% of the company's revenues.
In recent market activity, CW has continued to build on a record-setting FY2025, during which the company delivered sales of $3.5 billion (up 12%), adjusted operating margin of 18.6%, and adjusted diluted EPS (earnings per share) of $13.23 (up 21%). Free cash flow reached a record $554 million, representing 111% FCF (free cash flow) conversion. The company's backlog grew 18% to $4.1 billion, driven by strong demand in naval defense — particularly submarine programs — and commercial nuclear markets. In the first quarter of 2026, CW posted revenue of $913.69 million, up 13.4% year-over-year, and EPS of $3.48, beating consensus estimates. The company also announced an $80 million multi-year expansion of its Cheswick, Pennsylvania facility to increase manufacturing and testing capacity for naval defense and nuclear applications. Analyst consensus currently stands at "Moderate Buy," with price targets ranging from approximately $724 to $870, reflecting cautious optimism about continued momentum.
Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM) is a leading global provider of advanced engineered solutions for the aerospace and transportation industries. The company's portfolio includes jet engine components, aerospace fastening systems, titanium and aluminum structural parts, and forged aluminum wheels for commercial transportation. Its primary business segments are Engine Products, Fastening Systems, Engineered Structures, and Forged Wheels. HWM derives a significant majority of its revenue from aerospace end markets, with commercial aerospace and defense aerospace serving as the dominant growth engines.
In recent quarters, HWM has demonstrated remarkable financial momentum. For full-year 2025, the company reported revenue of $8.25 billion, an 11% increase from the prior year, and diluted EPS of $3.71, up nearly 32%. The third quarter of 2025 was particularly strong: revenue reached $2.09 billion (up 14% year-over-year), adjusted EBITDA surged 26% to $614 million, and EBITDA margins expanded by 290 basis points to 29.4%. Commercial aerospace revenue grew 15%, while defense aerospace jumped 24%. The Engine Products segment led the way with 17% revenue growth and a 33.3% adjusted EBITDA margin. Net leverage improved to just 1.1x net debt-to-EBITDA, and S&P upgraded the company's credit rating to BBB+. Looking ahead, management has guided for approximately $9 billion in revenue for 2026, supported by record commercial aerospace backlogs and sustained defense spending. The stock's price performance has been extraordinary, with a five-year total return of roughly 773%.
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots represent a curated selection of the platform's top-performing, AI-driven trading bots — chosen from a pool of hundreds of bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers. Only the bots best suited to current market conditions earn a spot in this featured section, where traders can browse bots with diverse trading styles, timeframes, strategies, and risk profiles. Some bots specialize in short-term momentum plays, while others target longer-term trends or focus on specific sectors. Performance statistics vary, with select bots showcasing winning trade percentages of 60% to 80% and annualized returns spanning a wide range depending on strategy and market volatility. Each bot displays transparent historical performance data, including trade-by-trade records, drawdown metrics, and real-time profit-and-loss tracking. For those looking to integrate data-driven, emotion-free decision-making into their trading workflow, exploring the Trending AI Robots page is a practical starting point.
While both CW and HWM benefit from powerful secular tailwinds in aerospace and defense, their investment profiles differ in several important respects. Business model diversification is a key differentiator: CW is a diversified engineering company with meaningful exposure to naval defense submarines, commercial nuclear energy, and defense electronics alongside commercial aerospace. HWM, by contrast, is more narrowly focused on aerospace engine components, fasteners, and structural parts — giving it higher concentration in the commercial aerospace cycle.
Scale and market cap represent another clear contrast. HWM's market capitalization of roughly $109 billion is more than four times that of CW's approximately $26 billion. This larger size, combined with higher daily trading liquidity, may appeal to institutional investors and those prioritizing large-cap stability. Margin profiles also diverge: HWM consistently delivers higher EBITDA margins (29.4% in Q3 2025), while CW has been steadily expanding its adjusted operating margins toward the 19% range. Balance sheet strength favors CW, which carries a debt-to-equity ratio of just 0.29, compared with HWM's net leverage of 1.1x.
Risk factors vary as well. HWM faces headwinds in its Forged Wheels segment, where commercial transportation volumes have declined by double digits, and ongoing tariff uncertainty has created a modest margin drag. CW's exposure to government defense contracts provides revenue visibility but also subjects it to potential shifts in federal budget priorities. Valuation reflects the market's enthusiasm for both names: CW trades at a trailing P/E (price-to-earnings ratio) of approximately 52, while HWM trades at a significantly higher multiple given its faster near-term EPS growth trajectory and premium ascribed to pure-play aerospace assets.
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, relative momentum, and growth catalyst visibility, Tickeron's AI-driven analysis would likely favor Howmet Aerospace (HWM) in the current market environment, while acknowledging compelling merits in both stocks. HWM benefits from stronger and more consistent top-line acceleration — with commercial aerospace revenue growing 15% and defense aerospace surging 24% in recent quarters — paired with industry-leading EBITDA margins approaching 30%. The company's 2026 revenue guidance of $9 billion implies continued double-digit growth, supported by record aircraft backlogs that are largely independent of near-term economic fluctuations. Additionally, HWM's larger market capitalization, higher trading liquidity, and S&P credit rating upgrade to BBB+ contribute to a more favorable relative positioning from a trend-following perspective. That said, CW's lower leverage, diversified end-market exposure across naval defense and nuclear energy, and steadily expanding margins make it an equally well-supported holding for risk-conscious investors who value balance-sheet resilience. In probabilistic terms, the AI would likely assign a modest edge to HWM based on momentum and earnings revision trends, while recognizing that both stocks exhibit the hallmarks of sustained institutional accumulation.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CW’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHWM’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CW’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HWM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
CW (@Aerospace & Defense) experienced а +4.81% price change this week, while HWM (@Aerospace & Defense) price change was +5.86% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Aerospace & Defense industry was -0.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.55%.
CW is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
HWM is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.
Aerospace & Defense is one of largest industries in the U.S., mainly comprising the following areas: commercial airliners, military aircraft, missiles, space, and general aviation. Focused heavily on research & development, it is also one of the fastest growing industries. Military aircraft has the largest market share in the industry’s sales, followed by space systems, civil aircraft, and missiles. Aerospace exports, directly and indirectly, support more jobs than the export of any other commodity, according to a study by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Boeing Company, Lockheed Martin Corporation and General Electric Company are some of the most prominent players in this space.
| CW | HWM | CW / HWM | |
| Capitalization | 27.7B | 115B | 24% |
| EBITDA | 818M | 2.55B | 32% |
| Gain YTD | 36.148 | 40.172 | 90% |
| P/E Ratio | 54.95 | 66.61 | 82% |
| Revenue | 3.61B | 8.62B | 42% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 2.44B | - |
| Total Debt | 1.15B | 4.69B | 24% |
CW | HWM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 67 | 9 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 70 Overvalued | 79 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 2 | 2 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 46 | 30 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 14 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 25 | 36 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CW's Valuation (70) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as HWM (79) in the null industry. This means that CW’s stock grew similarly to HWM’s over the last 12 months.
CW's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as HWM (2) in the null industry. This means that CW’s stock grew similarly to HWM’s over the last 12 months.
HWM's SMR Rating (30) in the null industry is in the same range as CW (46) in the Aerospace And Defense industry. This means that HWM’s stock grew similarly to CW’s over the last 12 months.
HWM's Price Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CW (48) in the Aerospace And Defense industry. This means that HWM’s stock grew somewhat faster than CW’s over the last 12 months.
CW's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as HWM (36) in the null industry. This means that CW’s stock grew similarly to HWM’s over the last 12 months.
| CW | HWM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 45% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 40% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 44% | 17 days ago 49% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 51% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | N/A |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CW has been closely correlated with BWXT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CW jumps, then BWXT could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HWM has been closely correlated with GE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HWM jumps, then GE could also see price increases.