Advertisement
CW vs HWM
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) vs. Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- CW has delivered stronger year-to-date (YTD) performance at approximately 32% compared to HWM's 24%, driven by robust defense sector demand.
- HWM boasts a larger market capitalization of over $100 billion versus CW's $27 billion, reflecting broader scale in aerospace components.
- Both stocks have significantly outperformed the S&P 500 over the past year, with CW up 131% and HWM up 103%.
- Recent market activity shows shares of both rising amid aerospace tailwinds, including HWM's $1.8 billion acquisition and CW's upcoming earnings.
- Analyst sentiment remains positive, with average price targets suggesting upside potential for both in the aerospace and defense sector.
- Tickeron AI tools highlight momentum in these tickers, favoring relative strength in recent weeks.
Introduction
This stock comparison examines CW and HWM, two prominent players in the aerospace and defense sector. Both companies benefit from rising demand in commercial aviation recovery, defense spending, and industrial applications. Traders seeking momentum plays and long-term investors focused on industrials may find value in analyzing their relative performance, growth drivers, and market positioning. With broader market volatility, understanding contrasts in business models, recent catalysts, and sentiment shifts provides clarity for portfolio decisions in this high-growth area.
CW Overview and Recent Performance
Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW), headquartered in Davidson, North Carolina, designs and manufactures engineered products for aerospace, defense, nuclear power, and industrial markets. Operating through segments like Aerospace & Industrial, Defense Electronics, and Naval & Power, it supplies components such as sensors, avionics, pumps, and valves to military and commercial clients worldwide.
In recent market activity, CW shares have shown resilience, trading around $730 with a YTD gain of 32% and 131% over the past year, outpacing the S&P 500. Performance has been bolstered by strong Q4 2025 results, including EPS beats and revenue growth, alongside defense contracts like Navy propulsion systems. Analyst upgrades and raised price targets, such as Argus's $776, reflect positive sentiment from operational execution and sector tailwinds. Recent weeks have seen shares soar alongside peers amid broader aerospace strength.
HWM Overview and Recent Performance
Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM), based in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, specializes in advanced engineered solutions for aerospace engines, fastening systems, structures, and forged wheels for transportation. Its segments include Engine Products for airfoils and rings, Fastening Systems, Engineered Structures, and Forged Wheels, serving global clients in aircraft and industrial gas turbines.
Recent performance for HWM has been robust, with shares near $254, posting 24% YTD and 103% one-year returns, exceeding market benchmarks. Key influences include a $1.8 billion acquisition of Consolidated Aerospace Manufacturing to expand capabilities, Q4 earnings beats with 15% revenue growth, and analyst upgrades to Buy ratings with targets around $277. Sentiment has improved on strong cash flow and demand recovery, though shares experienced some volatility in recent weeks amid profit-taking.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, curated from hundreds available that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and styles. Only those demonstrating superior adaptation to current market conditions—such as momentum rotation in aerospace or volatility in industrials—earn a spot in this dynamic section. Stats highlight impressive ranges: annualized returns up to 227% or more, win rates of 70-95%, and profit factors reaching 12.5, with some bots like those in semis and defense posting 100% profitable trades over short periods. These bots employ deep learning for pattern recognition, risk controls, and sector focus, offering copy-trading options for users. Explore the page to identify bots aligning with your risk profile and market outlook.
Head-to-Head Comparison
CW and HWM share aerospace and defense exposure but differ in focus: CW emphasizes electronics, naval systems, and nuclear power for diversified revenue, while HWM leads in engine components and fasteners with heavier commercial aviation tilt. Growth drivers contrast with HWM's scale advantage (larger market cap, 25,000+ employees) versus CW's agility in defense contracts.
Recent momentum favors CW on higher YTD gains amid defense spending, though HWM shows acquisition-fueled catalysts. Risk factors include supply chain pressures for both, but HWM's premium valuation (higher P/E) trades off against CW's stability. Market sentiment leans positive for both, with analyst targets implying upside, yet CW edges in relative outperformance during volatile periods.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently favors CW based on superior trend consistency, higher YTD momentum at 32%, and stable defense catalysts amid recent market activity. Observable factors like earnings beats, analyst upgrades, and sector rotation position it probabilistically ahead of HWM, though HWM's growth via acquisitions warrants monitoring for shifts.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CW is a Hold and HWM is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CW’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHWM’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).
- CW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- HWM’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CW’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HWM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- HWM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CW (@Aerospace & Defense) experienced а +1.37% price change this week, while HWM (@Aerospace & Defense) price change was +1.20% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Aerospace & Defense industry was +4.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.52%.
Reported Earning Dates
CW is expected to report earnings on May 06, 2026.
HWM is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Aerospace & Defense (+4.81% weekly)Aerospace & Defense is one of largest industries in the U.S., mainly comprising the following areas: commercial airliners, military aircraft, missiles, space, and general aviation. Focused heavily on research & development, it is also one of the fastest growing industries. Military aircraft has the largest market share in the industry’s sales, followed by space systems, civil aircraft, and missiles. Aerospace exports, directly and indirectly, support more jobs than the export of any other commodity, according to a study by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Boeing Company, Lockheed Martin Corporation and General Electric Company are some of the most prominent players in this space.
| CW | HWM | CW / HWM | |
| Capitalization | 27.2B | 102B | 27% |
| EBITDA | 788M | 2.27B | 35% |
| Gain YTD | 33.492 | 24.786 | 135% |
| P/E Ratio | 57.16 | 68.92 | 83% |
| Revenue | 3.5B | 8.25B | 42% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 742M | - |
| Total Debt | 1.17B | 3.21B | 36% |
CW | HWM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 74 Overvalued | 73 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 2 | 3 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 45 | 31 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 10 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 14 | 22 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HWM's Valuation (73) in the null industry is in the same range as CW (74) in the Aerospace And Defense industry. This means that HWM’s stock grew similarly to CW’s over the last 12 months.
CW's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as HWM (3) in the null industry. This means that CW’s stock grew similarly to HWM’s over the last 12 months.
HWM's SMR Rating (31) in the null industry is in the same range as CW (45) in the Aerospace And Defense industry. This means that HWM’s stock grew similarly to CW’s over the last 12 months.
HWM's Price Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as CW (40) in the Aerospace And Defense industry. This means that HWM’s stock grew similarly to CW’s over the last 12 months.
CW's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as HWM (22) in the null industry. This means that CW’s stock grew similarly to HWM’s over the last 12 months.
| CW | HWM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 53% | 4 days ago 54% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 68% | 7 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 47% | 5 days ago 51% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 53% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 63% | 4 days ago 42% |
Advertisement
HWM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HWM has been closely correlated with GE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HWM jumps, then GE could also see price increases.