Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs ERBAX
CWGCX vs ERBAX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs ERBAX
CWGCX vs ERBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. ERBAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Buy and ERBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. ERBAX (601M). ERBAX (0.72) and CWGCX (0.72) have matching dividends . CWGCX was incepted earlier than ERBAX: CWGCX (25 years) vs ERBAX (16 years). CWGCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than ERBAX (1.13). ERBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. CWGCX (44.00). CWGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ERBAX: CWGCX (250) vs ERBAX (1000). CWGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.67 vs. ERBAX (2.64). CWGCX return over 5 years is better than : 29.13 vs. ERBAX (-1.07).
| CWGCX | ERBAX | CWGCX / ERBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.12 | 132% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.13 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.549 | 9.421 | 144% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 601M | 26,290% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.72 | 0.72 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.67 | 2.64 | 557% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.83 | 16.15 | 253% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.13 | -1.07 | -2,732% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.43 | 43.99 | 199% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement