Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs ERBAX
CWGCX vs ERBAX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs ERBAX
CWGCX vs ERBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. ERBAX commentary
Jun 22, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Hold and ERBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. ERBAX (580M). CWGCX (0.75) and ERBAX (0.71) have matching dividends . CWGCX was incepted earlier than ERBAX: CWGCX (25 years) vs ERBAX (16 years). CWGCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than ERBAX (1.13). ERBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. CWGCX (44.00). CWGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ERBAX: CWGCX (250) vs ERBAX (1000). CWGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.44 vs. ERBAX (8.90). CWGCX return over 5 years is better than : 32.85 vs. ERBAX (2.09).
| CWGCX | ERBAX | CWGCX / ERBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.12 | 132% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.13 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.328 | 11.515 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 580M | 27,586% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.71 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.44 | 8.90 | 230% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.62 | 18.67 | 234% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.85 | 2.09 | 1,568% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.24 | 50.58 | 188% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement