Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs ERBAX
CWGFX vs ERBAX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs ERBAX
CWGFX vs ERBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. ERBAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Buy and ERBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. ERBAX (601M). CWGFX pays higher dividends than ERBAX: CWGFX (1.31) vs ERBAX (0.72). CWGFX was incepted earlier than ERBAX: CWGFX (25 years) vs ERBAX (16 years). ERBAX (1.13) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). ERBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. CWGFX (44.00). CWGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ERBAX: CWGFX (250) vs ERBAX (1000). CWGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.55 vs. ERBAX (2.64). CWGFX return over 5 years is better than : 32.96 vs. ERBAX (-1.07).
| CWGFX | ERBAX | CWGFX / ERBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.12 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.13 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.986 | 9.421 | 148% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 601M | 26,290% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 0.72 | 182% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.55 | 2.64 | 590% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.96 | 16.15 | 272% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.96 | -1.07 | -3,091% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.69 | 43.99 | 213% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement