Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs ERBAX
CWGFX vs ERBAX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs ERBAX
CWGFX vs ERBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. ERBAX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a StrongBuy and ERBAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 156B vs. ERBAX (587M). CWGFX pays higher dividends than ERBAX: CWGFX (1.31) vs ERBAX (0.72). CWGFX was incepted earlier than ERBAX: CWGFX (25 years) vs ERBAX (16 years). ERBAX (1.13) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). ERBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. CWGFX (44.00). CWGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ERBAX: CWGFX (250) vs ERBAX (1000). CWGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.16 vs. ERBAX (3.94). CWGFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.91 vs. ERBAX (1.62).
| CWGFX | ERBAX | CWGFX / ERBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.12 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.13 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.994 | 12.176 | 140% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 156B | 587M | 26,576% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 0.72 | 182% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.16 | 3.94 | 436% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.63 | 24.92 | 219% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.91 | 1.62 | 2,280% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.42 | 44.04 | 214% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement