CWST
Price
$92.07
Change
-$1.46 (-1.56%)
Updated
Sep 8 closing price
Capitalization
5.86B
57 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GFL
Price
$42.87
Change
-$0.86 (-1.97%)
Updated
Sep 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
18.69B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CWST vs GFL

CWST vs GFL Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CWST vs. GFL commentary
Sep 09, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWST is a StrongBuy and GFL is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 09, 2026
Stock price -- (CWST: $93.53 vs. GFL: $42.87)
Brand notoriety: CWST and GFL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Environmental Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CWST: 53% vs. GFL: 278%
Market capitalization -- CWST: $5.95B vs. GFL: $18.69B
CWST [@Environmental Services] is valued at $5.95B. GFL’s [@Environmental Services] market capitalization is $18.69B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Environmental Services] industry ranges from $87.53B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Environmental Services] industry is $11.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CWST’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGFL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CWST’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GFL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CWST is a better buy in the long-term than GFL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CWST’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GFL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CWST’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • GFL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CWST is a better buy in the short-term than GFL.

Price Growth

CWST (@Environmental Services) experienced а -0.16% price change this week, while GFL (@Environmental Services) price change was +3.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was +2.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.24%.

Reported Earning Dates

CWST is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Environmental Services (+2.87% weekly)

Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFL($18.7B) has a higher market cap than CWST($5.86B). CWST has higher P/E ratio than GFL: CWST (1150.88) vs GFL (108.15). GFL YTD gains are higher at: -0.069 vs. CWST (-4.503). GFL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.65B vs. CWST (396M). GFL has more cash in the bank: 192M vs. CWST (25.5M). CWST has less debt than GFL: CWST (1.45B) vs GFL (10.1B). GFL has higher revenues than CWST: GFL (6.97B) vs CWST (1.96B).
CWSTGFLCWST / GFL
Capitalization5.86B18.7B31%
EBITDA396M1.65B24%
Gain YTD-4.503-0.0696,564%
P/E Ratio1150.88108.151,064%
Revenue1.96B6.97B28%
Total Cash25.5M192M13%
Total Debt1.45B10.1B14%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CWST vs GFL: Fundamental Ratings
CWST
GFL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6669
SMR RATING
1..100
9092
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5148
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5055

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GFL's Valuation (84) in the null industry is in the same range as CWST (98) in the Environmental Services industry. This means that GFL’s stock grew similarly to CWST’s over the last 12 months.

CWST's Profit vs Risk Rating (66) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as GFL (69) in the null industry. This means that CWST’s stock grew similarly to GFL’s over the last 12 months.

CWST's SMR Rating (90) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as GFL (92) in the null industry. This means that CWST’s stock grew similarly to GFL’s over the last 12 months.

GFL's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as CWST (51) in the Environmental Services industry. This means that GFL’s stock grew similarly to CWST’s over the last 12 months.

CWST's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Environmental Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for GFL (100) in the null industry. This means that CWST’s stock grew significantly faster than GFL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CWSTGFL
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CWST
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GFL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SUPP79.371.31
+1.68%
TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF
DEED21.030.04
+0.19%
First Trust Securitized Plus ETF
SPYG121.70-0.16
-0.13%
State Street SPDR Port S&P 500 Gr ETF
AIO25.96-0.04
-0.15%
Virtus Artificial Intelligence & Technology Opportunities Fund
RSPS30.89-0.23
-0.74%
Invesco S&P 500® Eql Wt Cnsm Stapl ETF

CWST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CWST has been loosely correlated with WM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CWST jumps, then WM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CWST
1D Price
Change %
CWST100%
-2.53%
WM - CWST
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.23%
WCN - CWST
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.16%
RSG - CWST
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.07%
GFL - CWST
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.57%
CLH - CWST
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.49%
More