CWST
Price
$90.06
Change
-$4.26 (-4.52%)
Updated
Apr 26, 6:59 PM EST
89 days until earnings call
GFL
Price
$32.05
Change
-$0.24 (-0.74%)
Updated
Apr 26, 6:59 PM EST
5 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

Compare predictions CWST vs GFL

Header iconCWST vs GFL Comparison
Open Charts CWST vs GFLBanner chart's image
Casella Waste Systems
Price$90.06
Change-$4.26 (-4.52%)
Volume$277.4K
CapitalizationN/A
GFL Environmental
Price$32.05
Change-$0.24 (-0.74%)
Volume$272.18K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
CWST vs GFL Comparison Chart

Loading...

CWSTDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
GFLDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
VS
CWST vs. GFL commentary
Apr 27, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWST is a Hold and GFL is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 27, 2024
Stock price -- (CWST: $94.32 vs. GFL: $32.29)
Brand notoriety: CWST and GFL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Environmental Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CWST: 119% vs. GFL: 103%
Market capitalization -- CWST: $5.73B vs. GFL: $12.81B
CWST [@Environmental Services] is valued at $5.73B. GFL’s [@Environmental Services] market capitalization is $12.81B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Environmental Services] industry ranges from $85.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Environmental Services] industry is $5.63B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CWST’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGFL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CWST’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GFL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CWST is a better buy in the long-term than GFL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CWST’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GFL’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CWST’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GFL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CWST is a better buy in the short-term than GFL.

Price Growth

CWST (@Environmental Services) experienced а +2.11% price change this week, while GFL (@Environmental Services) price change was -2.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was -4.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +41.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

CWST is expected to report earnings on Jul 25, 2024.

GFL is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Environmental Services (-4.21% weekly)

Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for CWST with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for GFL with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFL($12.8B) has a higher market cap than CWST($5.73B). GFL has higher P/E ratio than CWST: GFL (359.45) vs CWST (211.24). CWST YTD gains are higher at: 5.383 vs. GFL (-6.396). GFL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.22B vs. CWST (255M). CWST has more cash in the bank: 221M vs. GFL (136M). CWST has less debt than GFL: CWST (1.12B) vs GFL (9.29B). GFL has higher revenues than CWST: GFL (7.52B) vs CWST (1.27B).
CWSTGFLCWST / GFL
Capitalization5.73B12.8B45%
EBITDA255M2.22B12%
Gain YTD5.383-6.396-84%
P/E Ratio211.24359.4559%
Revenue1.27B7.52B17%
Total Cash221M136M163%
Total Debt1.12B9.29B12%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CWST: Fundamental Ratings
CWST
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
59
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8
SMR RATING
1..100
86
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
47
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CWSTGFL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CWSTDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
GFLDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AVLV61.970.20
+0.32%
Avantis US Large Cap Value ETF
XSVN45.960.11
+0.24%
BondBloxx Bloomberg SevenYrTrgDurUSTrETF
IBHI22.890.05
+0.22%
iShares iBonds 2029 Term HY & Inc ETF
CGSD25.340.02
+0.08%
Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF
UTRE48.400.02
+0.03%
US Treasury 3 Year Note ETF

CWST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CWST has been loosely correlated with WCN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CWST jumps, then WCN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CWST
1D Price
Change %
CWST100%
-4.52%
WCN - CWST
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.03%
RSG - CWST
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.85%
CLH - CWST
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.33%
GFL - CWST
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.74%
WM - CWST
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.22%
More

GFL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GFL has been loosely correlated with WCN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GFL jumps, then WCN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GFL
1D Price
Change %
GFL100%
-1.73%
WCN - GFL
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.60%
CWST - GFL
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.71%
RSG - GFL
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.82%
CLH - GFL
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.69%
WM - GFL
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.08%
More