CWST
Price
$91.03
Change
+$0.47 (+0.52%)
Updated
Aug 13 closing price
Capitalization
5.79B
82 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WCN
Price
$165.53
Change
+$0.19 (+0.11%)
Updated
Aug 13 closing price
Capitalization
41.64B
75 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CWST vs WCN

CWST vs WCN Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Jul 27, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Casella Waste Systems (CWST) vs. Waste Connections (WCN) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Scale Differential: WCN generated $9.47 billion in revenue in fiscal 2025 with an industry-leading 33.0% adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) margin, while CWST posted $1.84 billion with an adjusted EBITDA margin of roughly 23%.
  • Profitability Contrast: Waste Connections delivered $1.077 billion in net income in fiscal 2025; Casella reported just $7.9 million as heavy depreciation from acquisitions weighed on GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) earnings.
  • Momentum Divergence: Both stocks have pulled back from highs — CWST is down approximately 18% year-to-date while WCN is down roughly 3%, reflecting different degrees of downside resilience.
  • Growth Profile: CWST is pursuing an aggressive acquisition-driven expansion strategy, having added over $145 million in annualized revenue through deals closed around the turn of 2026, while WCN focuses on price-led organic growth and margin expansion.
  • Analyst Sentiment: Wall Street analysts maintain a consensus Buy rating on both stocks, with CWST carrying a price target implying roughly 25% upside and WCN approximately 21% upside from recent levels.

Introduction

The waste management sector has long been a favored destination for investors seeking steady, recession-resilient growth. Within this defensive industry, two names frequently appear on watchlists for different reasons: CWST (Casella Waste Systems) represents a regional consolidator with an aggressive acquisition strategy, while WCN (Waste Connections) stands as a North American titan with industry-leading margins and a disciplined capital allocation framework. This stock comparison examines how these two companies stack up across key dimensions — from recent performance and growth drivers to risk profiles and market positioning — offering a structured viewpoint for investors evaluating the waste services space.

CWST Overview and Recent Performance

Casella Waste Systems, headquartered in Rutland, Vermont, operates as a vertically integrated solid waste services company primarily serving the eastern United States. The company provides collection, transfer, disposal, and recycling services across its Eastern, Western, Mid-Atlantic, and Resource Solutions operating segments. CWST has carved out a distinct identity as a serial acquirer, using tuck-in acquisitions and new market entries to densify its geographic footprint and capture synergies.

Fiscal 2025 closed with revenues of $1.837 billion, reflecting 18% year-over-year growth driven by both acquisition contributions and sustained pricing power — solid waste pricing rose 4.9% for the full year. Adjusted EBITDA reached $422.8 million, up 17.3%. However, GAAP net income contracted to just $7.9 million, or $0.12 per diluted share, as higher depreciation and amortization related to acquisitions compressed reported earnings. The company completed nine acquisitions during the year representing approximately $115 million in annualized revenue, and added Mountain State Waste on January 1, 2026, for another $30 million.

In recent weeks, CWST shares have traded near the $89–$90 range, well below their 52-week high of approximately $111. The stock has encountered headwinds as the market digests the pace of acquisition integration and associated margin pressures, particularly in the Mid-Atlantic region where system conversions from acquired assets have created temporary operational friction. Nonetheless, management raised 2026 guidance following a first-quarter earnings beat, targeting revenue between $2.06 billion and $2.08 billion and adjusted EBITDA of $473 million to $483 million. Analysts at Stifel and Barclays have reiterated positive ratings, citing the expectation that rail competition headwinds affecting landfill pricing will diminish and that identified cost synergies of $30 million over three years will support margin expansion.

WCN Overview and Recent Performance

Waste Connections, domiciled in Woodbridge, Ontario, is a continent-scale provider of non-hazardous waste collection, transfer, and disposal services across the United States and Canada. The company serves residential, commercial, municipal, industrial, and exploration and production (E&P) customers through an extensive network of landfills, transfer stations, and recycling facilities. WCN has earned a reputation for operational excellence, consistently delivering industry-leading adjusted EBITDA margins that distinguish it from peers.

Fiscal 2025 was a standout year: revenue rose to $9.467 billion, adjusted EBITDA climbed to $3.125 billion (a 33.0% margin, up 50 basis points year over year), and net income surged to $1.077 billion, or $4.17 per diluted share. The company achieved solid waste core pricing of 6.5%, while employee turnover and safety incident rates declined for a third consecutive year, reaching multi-year lows. Waste Connections closed 19 acquisitions totaling approximately $330 million in annualized revenue and returned a record $839.3 million to shareholders through dividends and share repurchases — including over $500 million in buybacks.

In the current trading environment, WCN shares have hovered around $169–$170, down modestly from their 52-week high near $192 but showing relative stability thanks to a low beta of 0.48. The company's 2026 outlook projects revenue between $9.90 billion and $9.95 billion and adjusted EBITDA between $3.30 billion and $3.325 billion, implying continued margin expansion. Adjusted free cash flow is guided to $1.40–$1.45 billion, representing double-digit growth. The quarterly dividend was raised to $1.40 annually, and the balance sheet remains robust with leverage at 2.75 times debt-to-EBITDA, providing ample capacity for additional acquisitions.

Trending AI Robots

For traders and investors seeking a data-driven edge in navigating comparisons like this one, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots designed to adapt to shifting market conditions. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers across diverse timeframes, strategies, and risk profiles. Only the bots demonstrating the strongest alignment with current market dynamics earn a place in the Trending AI Robots section. These bots vary widely — some specialize in short-term momentum plays, others in swing trading or longer-duration trend-following, and each comes with its own trackable performance statistics, win rates, and trade frequency metrics. Exploring this curated list can help traders identify statistically grounded approaches to complement their own research process. Discover the full range of active strategies on the Trending AI Robots page.

Head-to-Head Comparison

The most immediate contrast between these two waste management companies is scale. Waste Connections generates more than five times the annual revenue of Casella Waste Systems and operates with a profitability profile that sets the industry standard. WCN's adjusted EBITDA margin of 33.0% towers above CWST's roughly 23%, reflecting a more mature, operationally optimized network and greater pricing power across diverse geographies.

Growth strategies also diverge meaningfully. CWST is in a high-growth, acquisition-heavy phase — revenue expanded 18% in fiscal 2025, and the company has added over $800 million in annualized revenue through acquisitions over the past five years. This strategy creates near-term margin dilution from integration costs and elevated depreciation but lays the groundwork for longer-term synergy realization. WCN, by contrast, pursues a more balanced model combining price-led organic growth (6.5% core pricing in 2025), selective acquisitions, and substantial capital returns to shareholders through dividends and buybacks.

Risk profiles differ accordingly. CWST carries higher execution risk tied to acquisition integration — particularly the system conversions associated with former GFL assets in the Mid-Atlantic — and its elevated P/E ratio (price-to-earnings) of over 790 reflects depressed GAAP earnings rather than overvaluation on an enterprise-value-to-EBITDA basis. WCN faces more modest operational risks, though the Chiquita Canyon landfill situation remains a regulatory and financial overhang requiring ongoing management attention. WCN also has exposure to recycled commodity price cycles and E&P activity levels, though management has demonstrated an ability to offset these with pricing discipline.

On market sentiment, WCN's lower beta (0.48 vs. 0.74 for CWST) and dividend yield of approximately 0.82% position it as the more defensive holding within the sector. CWST's higher beta and lack of a dividend make it comparatively more volatile, though the stock's recent pullback may appeal to investors with a higher risk tolerance and a longer time horizon for synergy-driven margin recovery.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trend consistency, relative stability, and fundamental positioning, Tickeron's AI-driven analysis would likely favor WCN in the current market environment. Waste Connections offers a stronger combination of consistent profitability, industry-leading margins, robust free cash flow generation, and a disciplined capital return program — attributes that tend to align well with AI models prioritizing trend reliability and downside resilience. Casella Waste Systems presents a more dynamic growth narrative with its aggressive acquisition strategy and synergy realization pathway, but the associated integration risk, compressed GAAP earnings, and higher relative volatility introduce greater uncertainty into its near-term trajectory. While CWST's long-term value creation thesis remains intact — and several Wall Street analysts see material upside — the AI verdict tilts toward WCN as the steadier, probabilistically favored candidate under current conditions. This assessment reflects a comparative, data-informed perspective and does not constitute personal investment advice.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CWST vs. WCN commentary
Aug 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWST is a Hold and WCN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 14, 2026
Stock price -- (CWST: $91.03 vs. WCN: $165.53)
Brand notoriety: CWST and WCN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Environmental Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CWST: 30% vs. WCN: 70%
Market capitalization -- CWST: $5.79B vs. WCN: $41.64B
CWST [@Environmental Services] is valued at $5.79B. WCN’s [@Environmental Services] market capitalization is $41.64B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Environmental Services] industry ranges from $89.62B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Environmental Services] industry is $11.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CWST’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWCN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CWST’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WCN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, WCN is a better buy in the long-term than CWST.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CWST’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WCN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CWST’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • WCN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WCN is a better buy in the short-term than CWST.

Price Growth

CWST (@Environmental Services) experienced а +0.63% price change this week, while WCN (@Environmental Services) price change was -1.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was +3.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

CWST is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.

WCN is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Environmental Services (+3.76% weekly)

Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WCN($41.6B) has a higher market cap than CWST($5.79B). CWST has higher P/E ratio than WCN: CWST (1137.88) vs WCN (39.98). WCN YTD gains are higher at: -4.993 vs. CWST (-7.055). WCN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.01B vs. CWST (386M). CWST has less debt than WCN: CWST (1.24B) vs WCN (9.61B). WCN has higher revenues than CWST: WCN (9.76B) vs CWST (1.88B).
CWSTWCNCWST / WCN
Capitalization5.79B41.6B14%
EBITDA386M3.01B13%
Gain YTD-7.055-4.993141%
P/E Ratio1137.8839.982,846%
Revenue1.88B9.76B19%
Total Cash127MN/A-
Total Debt1.24B9.61B13%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CWST vs WCN: Fundamental Ratings
CWST
WCN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
771
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6750
SMR RATING
1..100
9162
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6157
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
893
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WCN's Valuation (42) in the Environmental Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CWST (97). This means that WCN’s stock grew somewhat faster than CWST’s over the last 12 months.

WCN's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as CWST (67). This means that WCN’s stock grew similarly to CWST’s over the last 12 months.

WCN's SMR Rating (62) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as CWST (91). This means that WCN’s stock grew similarly to CWST’s over the last 12 months.

WCN's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as CWST (61). This means that WCN’s stock grew similarly to CWST’s over the last 12 months.

CWST's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Environmental Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for WCN (93). This means that CWST’s stock grew significantly faster than WCN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CWSTWCN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
46%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
46%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CWST
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WCN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MAGX56.861.36
+2.45%
Roundhill Daily 2X Lon Mag Sev ETF
SHOC110.071.07
+0.99%
Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF
DGRO80.000.16
+0.20%
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
UFOX87.77-0.02
-0.02%
Defiance Space and Connective Tech ETF
GDT35.66-0.47
-1.31%
WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund

CWST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CWST has been loosely correlated with WM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CWST jumps, then WM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CWST
1D Price
Change %
CWST100%
+0.52%
WM - CWST
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.93%
RSG - CWST
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.45%
GFL - CWST
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.91%
CLH - CWST
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.13%
GWAV - CWST
9%
Poorly correlated
-6.58%
More