The waste management sector has long been a favored destination for investors seeking steady, recession-resilient growth. Within this defensive industry, two names frequently appear on watchlists for different reasons: CWST (Casella Waste Systems) represents a regional consolidator with an aggressive acquisition strategy, while WCN (Waste Connections) stands as a North American titan with industry-leading margins and a disciplined capital allocation framework. This stock comparison examines how these two companies stack up across key dimensions — from recent performance and growth drivers to risk profiles and market positioning — offering a structured viewpoint for investors evaluating the waste services space.
Casella Waste Systems, headquartered in Rutland, Vermont, operates as a vertically integrated solid waste services company primarily serving the eastern United States. The company provides collection, transfer, disposal, and recycling services across its Eastern, Western, Mid-Atlantic, and Resource Solutions operating segments. CWST has carved out a distinct identity as a serial acquirer, using tuck-in acquisitions and new market entries to densify its geographic footprint and capture synergies.
Fiscal 2025 closed with revenues of $1.837 billion, reflecting 18% year-over-year growth driven by both acquisition contributions and sustained pricing power — solid waste pricing rose 4.9% for the full year. Adjusted EBITDA reached $422.8 million, up 17.3%. However, GAAP net income contracted to just $7.9 million, or $0.12 per diluted share, as higher depreciation and amortization related to acquisitions compressed reported earnings. The company completed nine acquisitions during the year representing approximately $115 million in annualized revenue, and added Mountain State Waste on January 1, 2026, for another $30 million.
In recent weeks, CWST shares have traded near the $89–$90 range, well below their 52-week high of approximately $111. The stock has encountered headwinds as the market digests the pace of acquisition integration and associated margin pressures, particularly in the Mid-Atlantic region where system conversions from acquired assets have created temporary operational friction. Nonetheless, management raised 2026 guidance following a first-quarter earnings beat, targeting revenue between $2.06 billion and $2.08 billion and adjusted EBITDA of $473 million to $483 million. Analysts at Stifel and Barclays have reiterated positive ratings, citing the expectation that rail competition headwinds affecting landfill pricing will diminish and that identified cost synergies of $30 million over three years will support margin expansion.
Waste Connections, domiciled in Woodbridge, Ontario, is a continent-scale provider of non-hazardous waste collection, transfer, and disposal services across the United States and Canada. The company serves residential, commercial, municipal, industrial, and exploration and production (E&P) customers through an extensive network of landfills, transfer stations, and recycling facilities. WCN has earned a reputation for operational excellence, consistently delivering industry-leading adjusted EBITDA margins that distinguish it from peers.
Fiscal 2025 was a standout year: revenue rose to $9.467 billion, adjusted EBITDA climbed to $3.125 billion (a 33.0% margin, up 50 basis points year over year), and net income surged to $1.077 billion, or $4.17 per diluted share. The company achieved solid waste core pricing of 6.5%, while employee turnover and safety incident rates declined for a third consecutive year, reaching multi-year lows. Waste Connections closed 19 acquisitions totaling approximately $330 million in annualized revenue and returned a record $839.3 million to shareholders through dividends and share repurchases — including over $500 million in buybacks.
In the current trading environment, WCN shares have hovered around $169–$170, down modestly from their 52-week high near $192 but showing relative stability thanks to a low beta of 0.48. The company's 2026 outlook projects revenue between $9.90 billion and $9.95 billion and adjusted EBITDA between $3.30 billion and $3.325 billion, implying continued margin expansion. Adjusted free cash flow is guided to $1.40–$1.45 billion, representing double-digit growth. The quarterly dividend was raised to $1.40 annually, and the balance sheet remains robust with leverage at 2.75 times debt-to-EBITDA, providing ample capacity for additional acquisitions.
For traders and investors seeking a data-driven edge in navigating comparisons like this one, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots designed to adapt to shifting market conditions. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers across diverse timeframes, strategies, and risk profiles. Only the bots demonstrating the strongest alignment with current market dynamics earn a place in the Trending AI Robots section. These bots vary widely — some specialize in short-term momentum plays, others in swing trading or longer-duration trend-following, and each comes with its own trackable performance statistics, win rates, and trade frequency metrics. Exploring this curated list can help traders identify statistically grounded approaches to complement their own research process. Discover the full range of active strategies on the Trending AI Robots page.
The most immediate contrast between these two waste management companies is scale. Waste Connections generates more than five times the annual revenue of Casella Waste Systems and operates with a profitability profile that sets the industry standard. WCN's adjusted EBITDA margin of 33.0% towers above CWST's roughly 23%, reflecting a more mature, operationally optimized network and greater pricing power across diverse geographies.
Growth strategies also diverge meaningfully. CWST is in a high-growth, acquisition-heavy phase — revenue expanded 18% in fiscal 2025, and the company has added over $800 million in annualized revenue through acquisitions over the past five years. This strategy creates near-term margin dilution from integration costs and elevated depreciation but lays the groundwork for longer-term synergy realization. WCN, by contrast, pursues a more balanced model combining price-led organic growth (6.5% core pricing in 2025), selective acquisitions, and substantial capital returns to shareholders through dividends and buybacks.
Risk profiles differ accordingly. CWST carries higher execution risk tied to acquisition integration — particularly the system conversions associated with former GFL assets in the Mid-Atlantic — and its elevated P/E ratio (price-to-earnings) of over 790 reflects depressed GAAP earnings rather than overvaluation on an enterprise-value-to-EBITDA basis. WCN faces more modest operational risks, though the Chiquita Canyon landfill situation remains a regulatory and financial overhang requiring ongoing management attention. WCN also has exposure to recycled commodity price cycles and E&P activity levels, though management has demonstrated an ability to offset these with pricing discipline.
On market sentiment, WCN's lower beta (0.48 vs. 0.74 for CWST) and dividend yield of approximately 0.82% position it as the more defensive holding within the sector. CWST's higher beta and lack of a dividend make it comparatively more volatile, though the stock's recent pullback may appeal to investors with a higher risk tolerance and a longer time horizon for synergy-driven margin recovery.
Based on observable trend consistency, relative stability, and fundamental positioning, Tickeron's AI-driven analysis would likely favor WCN in the current market environment. Waste Connections offers a stronger combination of consistent profitability, industry-leading margins, robust free cash flow generation, and a disciplined capital return program — attributes that tend to align well with AI models prioritizing trend reliability and downside resilience. Casella Waste Systems presents a more dynamic growth narrative with its aggressive acquisition strategy and synergy realization pathway, but the associated integration risk, compressed GAAP earnings, and higher relative volatility introduce greater uncertainty into its near-term trajectory. While CWST's long-term value creation thesis remains intact — and several Wall Street analysts see material upside — the AI verdict tilts toward WCN as the steadier, probabilistically favored candidate under current conditions. This assessment reflects a comparative, data-informed perspective and does not constitute personal investment advice.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CWST’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWCN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CWST’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WCN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
CWST (@Environmental Services) experienced а +0.63% price change this week, while WCN (@Environmental Services) price change was -1.11% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was +3.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.89%.
CWST is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
WCN is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.
Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.
| CWST | WCN | CWST / WCN | |
| Capitalization | 5.79B | 41.6B | 14% |
| EBITDA | 386M | 3.01B | 13% |
| Gain YTD | -7.055 | -4.993 | 141% |
| P/E Ratio | 1137.88 | 39.98 | 2,846% |
| Revenue | 1.88B | 9.76B | 19% |
| Total Cash | 127M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 1.24B | 9.61B | 13% |
CWST | WCN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 7 | 71 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 97 Overvalued | 42 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 67 | 50 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 62 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 8 | 93 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
WCN's Valuation (42) in the Environmental Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CWST (97). This means that WCN’s stock grew somewhat faster than CWST’s over the last 12 months.
WCN's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as CWST (67). This means that WCN’s stock grew similarly to CWST’s over the last 12 months.
WCN's SMR Rating (62) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as CWST (91). This means that WCN’s stock grew similarly to CWST’s over the last 12 months.
WCN's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as CWST (61). This means that WCN’s stock grew similarly to CWST’s over the last 12 months.
CWST's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Environmental Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for WCN (93). This means that CWST’s stock grew significantly faster than WCN’s over the last 12 months.
| CWST | WCN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 54% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 44% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 50% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 45% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 44% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 62% | 12 days ago 46% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 61% | 10 days ago 46% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 52% | 1 day ago 39% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MAGX | 56.86 | 1.36 | +2.45% |
| Roundhill Daily 2X Lon Mag Sev ETF | |||
| SHOC | 110.07 | 1.07 | +0.99% |
| Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF | |||
| DGRO | 80.00 | 0.16 | +0.20% |
| iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | |||
| UFOX | 87.77 | -0.02 | -0.02% |
| Defiance Space and Connective Tech ETF | |||
| GDT | 35.66 | -0.47 | -1.31% |
| WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CWST has been loosely correlated with WM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CWST jumps, then WM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CWST | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CWST | 100% | +0.52% | ||
| WM - CWST | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.93% | ||
| RSG - CWST | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.45% | ||
| GFL - CWST | 40% Loosely correlated | +1.91% | ||
| CLH - CWST | 32% Poorly correlated | +1.13% | ||
| GWAV - CWST | 9% Poorly correlated | -6.58% | ||
More | ||||