This stock comparison examines two prominent names in the North American waste management and environmental services industry: Casella Waste Systems (CWST) and Republic Services (RSG). Although both companies collect, transport, and dispose of solid waste — and both have pursued acquisition-led expansion — they operate at vastly different scales and stages of corporate maturity. RSG is a large-cap industry titan with a $67 billion market capitalization and nationwide operations, while CWST is a mid-cap regional consolidator in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic. For investors and traders seeking exposure to the defensive waste sector — or evaluating relative performance, risk, and AI-driven signals — understanding how these two names contrast can provide valuable context.
Casella Waste Systems is a vertically integrated solid waste services company headquartered in Rutland, Vermont, providing collection, transfer, disposal, and recycling services across the eastern United States. The company has carved out a reputation as an aggressive serial acquirer within its regional footprint. In fiscal year 2025, CWST reported revenues of $1.84 billion, an 18% increase from the prior year, fueled by both organic pricing growth of approximately 4.9% and the contribution of nine acquisitions representing roughly $115 million in annualized revenue. An additional $30 million in annualized revenue was added with the closing of the Mountain State Waste acquisition on January 1, 2026.
Despite the strong top-line expansion, profitability metrics have been under pressure. GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) net income declined 42% year-over-year to $7.9 million in FY2025, weighed down by higher depreciation and amortization expenses tied to acquisition activity. On an adjusted basis, Adjusted EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization) — a widely used measure of operating performance — reached $422.8 million, up 17.3%. In recent weeks, the stock has traded in the $89 to $100 range, well below its 52-week high near $111, reflecting broader caution around higher-growth, acquisition-heavy names. The company has guided for FY2026 revenues between $1.97 billion and $1.99 billion and Adjusted EBITDA between $455 million and $465 million.
Republic Services, based in Phoenix, Arizona, is the second-largest non-hazardous solid waste management company in the United States, operating 207 landfills, 79 recycling centers, and a vast collection network. The company also maintains a growing environmental solutions division handling complex waste streams including hazardous materials. In FY2025, RSG generated total revenue of $16.59 billion, a 3.5% increase, with core pricing advancing 5.9%. Net income reached $2.14 billion, or $6.85 per diluted share, representing a 5.5% EPS (Earnings Per Share) increase. Adjusted EBITDA margin expanded 90 basis points to 32.0%, underscoring disciplined cost management.
Beyond traditional waste operations, RSG has been investing in forward-looking initiatives: nine renewable natural gas projects commenced operations in FY2025, and the company opened its second Polymer Center in Indianapolis to process recycled plastics for consumer packaging. Shareholder returns remain a priority — the company returned $1.6 billion through dividends ($738 million) and share repurchases ($854 million). In recent trading, the stock has held in the $210 to $225 range and is posting a modest positive return year-to-date. For FY2026, management guided to revenue of $17.05 billion to $17.15 billion and adjusted EPS of $7.20 to $7.28, signaling continued steady, if unspectacular, expansion.
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots drawn from hundreds available on the platform, each designed to trade thousands of different tickers across diverse market conditions. Only the strongest-performing and most market-appropriate bots earn placement in this featured section. These AI trading bots span a wide range of trading styles, strategies, and timeframes — from 5-minute and 15-minute high-frequency models to longer-duration 60-minute swing-trading approaches — and have posted annualized returns ranging from over 30% to more than 230% in select strategies. Each bot comes with its own performance statistics, win rates, closed-trade profit-and-loss figures, and a clearly defined set of tickers it trades. For traders and investors looking to explore how artificial intelligence can complement human decision-making in the current market, visiting the Trending AI Robots page is an informative next step.
The contrast between CWST and RSG is most visible across four dimensions: scale, profitability, growth strategy, and shareholder returns.
Scale and Diversification: RSG generates nearly ten times the annual revenue of CWST and operates a nationwide network with meaningful exposure to environmental solutions and renewable energy. CWST remains concentrated in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic, making it more sensitive to regional economic conditions but also more nimble in pursuing tuck-in acquisitions.
Profitability and Margins: RSG is consistently profitable with net income margins above 12% and an Adjusted EBITDA margin that expanded to 32% in FY2025. CWST operates with thinner GAAP profitability — net income was just $7.9 million in FY2025 — as acquisition-related depreciation and integration costs compress reported earnings even while Adjusted EBITDA grows.
Growth Trajectory: CWST delivered 18% revenue growth in FY2025, dwarfing RSG's 3.5%. However, that growth is partly inorganic and accompanied by integration risk. RSG grows more slowly but predictably, with pricing power and operational efficiency driving margin expansion.
Capital Returns: RSG pays a quarterly dividend (currently $0.625 per share, yielding approximately 1.15%) and actively repurchases stock. CWST does not pay a dividend, instead reinvesting all available capital into its acquisition pipeline — a trade-off that may appeal to growth-oriented investors but offers no income component.
Market Sentiment and Momentum: In recent weeks, RSG has exhibited lower volatility (beta of 0.41) and a steadier price trajectory relative to CWST (beta of 0.74). Analyst consensus rates CWST a "Buy" with a 12-month price target implying roughly 25% upside, reflecting expectations that acquisition synergies will eventually translate into improved profitability. RSG also commands analyst optimism, but the upside implied by consensus targets is generally more modest.
Based on observable factors — trend consistency, earnings stability, margin expansion, and risk-adjusted positioning — Tickeron's AI-driven analytical framework would likely express a preference for RSG in the current market environment. The larger company's consistent profitability, expanding margins, robust free cash flow generation, and shareholder-friendly capital allocation create a steadier trend profile that aligns well with AI models optimized for reliability and reduced drawdown risk. That said, CWST presents a higher-upside opportunity for strategies oriented around acquisition-led growth and mean reversion, particularly if integration costs begin to moderate and net income recovers toward the levels implied by the company's FY2026 guidance. The appropriate choice is ultimately strategy-dependent: RSG for stability and income, CWST for higher-growth potential with correspondingly higher volatility.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CWST’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRSG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CWST’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RSG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
CWST (@Environmental Services) experienced а +0.62% price change this week, while RSG (@Environmental Services) price change was +0.93% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was -1.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.29%.
CWST is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.
RSG is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.
Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.
| CWST | RSG | CWST / RSG | |
| Capitalization | 5.8B | 66.6B | 9% |
| EBITDA | 386M | 5.13B | 8% |
| Gain YTD | -6.984 | 3.111 | -224% |
| P/E Ratio | 828.18 | 31.08 | 2,665% |
| Revenue | 1.88B | 16.7B | 11% |
| Total Cash | 127M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 1.24B | 14.1B | 9% |
CWST | RSG | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 65 | 61 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 96 Overvalued | 40 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 65 | 23 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 48 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 13 | 68 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RSG's Valuation (40) in the Environmental Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CWST (96). This means that RSG’s stock grew somewhat faster than CWST’s over the last 12 months.
RSG's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Environmental Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CWST (65). This means that RSG’s stock grew somewhat faster than CWST’s over the last 12 months.
RSG's SMR Rating (48) in the Environmental Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CWST (91). This means that RSG’s stock grew somewhat faster than CWST’s over the last 12 months.
RSG's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as CWST (59). This means that RSG’s stock grew similarly to CWST’s over the last 12 months.
CWST's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Environmental Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RSG (68). This means that CWST’s stock grew somewhat faster than RSG’s over the last 12 months.
| CWST | RSG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 45% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 38% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 37% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 53% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 56% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 62% | 6 days ago 52% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 1 day ago 38% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 22% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 56% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BMN | 25.30 | 0.15 | +0.60% |
| BlackRock 2037 Municipal Target Term Trust | |||
| SCHG | 33.74 | 0.16 | +0.48% |
| Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF™ | |||
| PJBF | 67.62 | N/A | N/A |
| PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF | |||
| NIE | 25.77 | -0.05 | -0.19% |
| Virtus Equity & Convertible Income Fund | |||
| EMOP | 47.89 | -1.10 | -2.25% |
| AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CWST has been loosely correlated with WM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CWST jumps, then WM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CWST | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CWST | 100% | +2.02% | ||
| WM - CWST | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.63% | ||
| RSG - CWST | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.12% | ||
| GWAV - CWST | 9% Poorly correlated | -3.19% | ||
| PESI - CWST | 6% Poorly correlated | +6.12% | ||
| NVRI - CWST | 5% Poorly correlated | +0.41% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RSG has been closely correlated with WM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RSG jumps, then WM could also see price increases.