CXW
Price
$30.06
Change
+$0.41 (+1.38%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:04 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.93B
48 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MG
Price
$18.91
Change
+$0.17 (+0.91%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:11 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
596.24M
43 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CXW vs MG

CXW vs MG Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CXW vs. MG commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CXW is a Buy and MG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 24, 2026
Stock price -- (CXW: $29.65 vs. MG: $18.74)
Brand notoriety: CXW and MG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CXW: 162% vs. MG: 103%
Market capitalization -- CXW: $2.93B vs. MG: $596.24M
CXW [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] is valued at $2.93B. MG’s [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] market capitalization is $596.24M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $42.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $1.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CXW’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CXW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MG is a better buy in the long-term than CXW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CXW’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CXW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CXW and MG are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CXW (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а +6.77% price change this week, while MG (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was +1.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was -3.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +107.51%.

Reported Earning Dates

CXW is expected to report earnings on Aug 10, 2026.

MG is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (-3.63% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CXW($2.93B) has a higher market cap than MG($596M). MG has higher P/E ratio than CXW: MG (26.77) vs CXW (24.11). CXW YTD gains are higher at: 55.154 vs. MG (48.142). CXW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 374M vs. MG (75M). CXW has more cash in the bank: 210M vs. MG (25M). MG has less debt than CXW: MG (217M) vs CXW (1.4B). CXW has higher revenues than MG: CXW (2.34B) vs MG (731M).
CXWMGCXW / MG
Capitalization2.93B596M492%
EBITDA374M75M499%
Gain YTD55.15448.142115%
P/E Ratio24.1126.7790%
Revenue2.34B731M320%
Total Cash210M25M840%
Total Debt1.4B217M644%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CXW vs MG: Fundamental Ratings
CXW
MG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4787
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1446
SMR RATING
1..100
7570
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3738
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6015
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MG's Valuation (80) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as CXW (98) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that MG’s stock grew similarly to CXW’s over the last 12 months.

CXW's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as MG (46) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that CXW’s stock grew similarly to MG’s over the last 12 months.

MG's SMR Rating (70) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as CXW (75) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that MG’s stock grew similarly to CXW’s over the last 12 months.

CXW's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as MG (38) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that CXW’s stock grew similarly to MG’s over the last 12 months.

MG's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CXW (60) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that MG’s stock grew somewhat faster than CXW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CXWMG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CXW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DFJ108.511.10
+1.03%
WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend ETF
IDYN30.520.13
+0.43%
iShares Intl Eq Fac Rotation Act ETF
FXB127.390.46
+0.37%
Invesco CcyShrs® British Pound Stlg
GMUB51.360.02
+0.04%
Goldman Sachs Municipal Income ETF
SPYX60.94-0.24
-0.40%
SttStrt® SPDR® S&P®500FsslFulRsrvFreeETF

CXW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CXW has been closely correlated with GEO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CXW jumps, then GEO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CXW
1D Price
Change %
CXW100%
+2.60%
GEO - CXW
75%
Closely correlated
+1.33%
KIM - CXW
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.27%
BFS - CXW
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.72%
BRX - CXW
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.87%
RYN - CXW
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.33%
More

MG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MG has been loosely correlated with ARLO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MG jumps, then ARLO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MG
1D Price
Change %
MG100%
+1.52%
ARLO - MG
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.23%
REZI - MG
38%
Loosely correlated
-2.44%
BCO - MG
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.12%
AZZ - MG
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.67%
CXW - MG
33%
Poorly correlated
+2.60%
More