CZFS
Price
$77.52
Change
+$1.14 (+1.49%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
372.82M
88 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
OSBC
Price
$25.29
Change
-$0.05 (-0.20%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
1.29B
79 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CZFS vs OSBC

CZFS vs OSBC Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 28, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Citizens Financial Services (CZFS) vs. Old Second Bancorp (OSBC) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • CZFS (Citizens Financial Services) is a smaller community bank with a market capitalization of approximately $365 million, while OSBC (Old Second Bancorp) is a mid-sized regional bank with a market cap near $1.24 billion, reflecting meaningfully different scale and market positioning.
  • CZFS has delivered strong earnings growth, with full-year 2025 net income rising 31.5% year-over-year and its net interest margin (NIM — the spread between what a bank earns on loans and pays on deposits) expanding to 3.50%.
  • OSBC completed a transformative acquisition of Bancorp Financial (Evergreen Bank Group) in mid-2025, significantly expanding its balance sheet and driving a NIM of 5.09% in Q4 2025 — among the strongest in the regional banking industry.
  • CZFS trades at a notably lower trailing P/E (price-to-earnings) ratio of roughly 9x versus approximately 14x for OSBC, suggesting a valuation discount despite improving fundamentals.
  • Both stocks have posted positive year-to-date returns in 2026, though OSBC has outperformed with a gain of roughly 28% compared to approximately 16% for CZFS.
  • Analyst sentiment leans more favorably toward OSBC, with a consensus "Buy" rating and an average price target above $26, implying additional upside potential.

Introduction

Regional and community banks are a vital segment of the U.S. financial system, and comparing two institutions from this sector can reveal meaningful differences in strategy, growth profile, and market positioning. CZFS (Citizens Financial Services, Inc.) and OSBC (Old Second Bancorp, Inc.) both operate as bank holding companies serving distinct geographic markets — Pennsylvania and the Mid-Atlantic for CZFS, and Illinois with the broader Midwest for OSBC. This comparison is most relevant for investors interested in the regional banking space who are weighing a smaller, value-priced community bank against a faster-growing, acquisition-driven competitor. Below, we examine each institution's recent performance, key catalysts, and relative positioning in the current market environment.

CZFS Overview and Recent Performance

Citizens Financial Services, Inc., headquartered in Mansfield, Pennsylvania, is the parent company of First Citizens Community Bank. The bank operates across Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware, and New Jersey, offering traditional deposit products, commercial and residential lending, agricultural financing, and wealth management services. With roughly $3.7 billion in total assets and a market capitalization near $365 million, CZFS is firmly in the small-cap community bank category.

In recent quarters, CZFS has demonstrated materially improved profitability. Full-year 2025 net income reached $36.6 million, a 31.5% increase from the prior year, driven by a notable expansion of its net interest margin (NIM) from 3.13% to 3.50%. Earnings per share (EPS) for 2025 came in at $7.62, and return on average equity (ROE — a measure of profitability relative to shareholder capital) improved to 11.51%. The bank's return on average tangible common equity (ROATCE) reached 15.94%, signaling strong capital efficiency. In the first quarter of 2026, CZFS reported EPS of $2.16, surpassing consensus estimates of $1.98.

However, investors have noted areas of caution. Non-performing assets (NPAs — loans at risk of default) stood at 1.24% of total loans as of year-end 2025, and the bank's relatively high loan-to-deposit ratio near 98% leaves limited balance sheet slack. The stock, which carries a low beta of 0.36, meaning it is significantly less volatile than the broader market, has nonetheless rebounded in 2026 after a mid-single-digit decline in 2025. Its current dividend yield of approximately 2.7% provides an attractive income component for shareholders.

OSBC Overview and Recent Performance

Old Second Bancorp, Inc., based in Aurora, Illinois, is the holding company for Old Second National Bank. The bank provides a full suite of community banking services — including commercial lending, residential mortgages, treasury management, and wealth management — primarily throughout the Chicago metropolitan area and northern Illinois. With total assets of approximately $6.9 billion and a market capitalization exceeding $1.2 billion as of late July 2026, OSBC operates at a significantly larger scale than CZFS.

The most consequential recent development for OSBC was its acquisition of Bancorp Financial, Inc. and its Evergreen Bank Group subsidiary, a $1.4 billion institution, which closed on July 1, 2025. While the acquisition temporarily depressed reported GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) earnings in Q3 2025 due to one-time merger costs and a day-two provision for credit losses, the underlying core performance has been robust. Adjusted Q4 2025 net income reached $30.8 million, or $0.58 per diluted share, and the bank posted an exceptional tax-equivalent NIM of 5.09%. Adjusted return on average assets (ROAA) was 1.75% and adjusted ROATCE reached 17.23%, placing OSBC among the more profitable mid-sized banks in the country.

Momentum has continued into 2026. The stock has gained roughly 28% year-to-date and approximately 40% over the trailing 12 months. The tangible common equity to tangible assets (TCE/TA) ratio improved to 11.02%, reflecting a well-capitalized position that supports both organic growth and potential future strategic moves. With six analysts covering the stock and a consensus "Buy" rating, institutional ownership stands at approximately 68%.

Trending AI Robots

For traders seeking data-driven insights beyond traditional fundamental analysis, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots designed to navigate evolving market conditions. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, but only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with current market dynamics earn a spot in this featured section. The available bots span a wide range of trading styles — from short-term momentum and swing trading strategies to longer-duration trend-following approaches — with historical performance statistics, win rates, and trade-frequency metrics displayed for transparency. Each bot operates with its own unique strategy, risk parameters, and designated set of tickers. Exploring the Trending AI Robots section can help investors identify algorithmically driven opportunities that complement their own research process.

Head-to-Head Comparison

When placed side by side, CZFS and OSBC present a study in contrasts across several dimensions:

Scale and Revenue. OSBC generates annual revenue of roughly $402 million compared to approximately $174 million for CZFS, giving the Illinois-based bank more than twice the top-line heft. This scale advantage translates into greater resources for technology investment, compliance infrastructure, and acquisition capacity.

Profitability and Efficiency. OSBC holds a clear edge in net interest margin (5.09% vs. approximately 3.50%) and return on assets (1.62% vs. 1.30%). However, CZFS reports a higher net profit margin (approximately 22.5% vs. 20.1%), reflecting tighter cost discipline relative to its revenue base. On return on equity, the two are closely matched, with OSBC at roughly 12.7% and CZFS at approximately 11.9%.

Valuation. CZFS trades at a trailing P/E of approximately 9x and a price-to-book ratio near 1.0x, representing a meaningful discount to OSBC's trailing P/E of roughly 14x and price-to-book of approximately 1.4x. This valuation gap partly reflects the market's reward for OSBC's stronger growth trajectory and superior NIM profile.

Dividend Profile. Income-oriented investors may favor CZFS, which offers a dividend yield near 2.7% compared to roughly 1.1% for OSBC. CZFS also pays out a higher proportion of earnings as dividends (approximately 25% vs. 17%), though both payout ratios are well within sustainable ranges.

Risk and Volatility. With a beta of 0.36, CZFS exhibits considerably lower market sensitivity than OSBC, which has a beta of 0.70. For risk-averse investors, the lower-volatility profile of CZFS may be appealing, though it also means less participation in broad market rallies. Conversely, OSBC's higher beta has been rewarded during the current upswing in regional bank stocks.

Growth Strategy. OSBC is clearly in a more aggressive growth phase, using M&A (mergers and acquisitions) to expand its footprint and asset base, while CZFS has focused on organic loan growth, margin improvement, and operational efficiency — a steadier, less transformative approach.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, earnings momentum, and relative market positioning, Tickeron's AI-driven analysis would likely tilt in favor of OSBC in the current environment. The stock has demonstrated stronger price momentum, a materially wider net interest margin, and a successful integration of a major acquisition that is already contributing to core profitability. Its higher institutional ownership, positive analyst consensus, and above-peer ROATCE suggest that the market is pricing in continued execution strength. That said, CZFS presents a compelling value case: a low P/E multiple, consistent earnings beats, a high dividend yield, and a lower-beta profile that may appeal in a more cautious market. The AI verdict is probabilistic rather than definitive — OSBC appears better positioned for momentum-driven outperformance, while CZFS offers a margin of safety that value-conscious investors may find attractive.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CZFS vs. OSBC commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZFS is a Buy and OSBC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (CZFS: $77.52 vs. OSBC: $25.29)
Brand notoriety: CZFS and OSBC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CZFS: 113% vs. OSBC: 55%
Market capitalization -- CZFS: $372.82M vs. OSBC: $1.29B
CZFS [@Regional Banks] is valued at $372.82M. OSBC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.29B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CZFS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOSBC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CZFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OSBC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, OSBC is a better buy in the long-term than CZFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CZFS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OSBC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CZFS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • OSBC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CZFS is a better buy in the short-term than OSBC.

Price Growth

CZFS (@Regional Banks) experienced а +3.53% price change this week, while OSBC (@Regional Banks) price change was +5.53% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

CZFS is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2026.

OSBC is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.19% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OSBC($1.29B) has a higher market cap than CZFS($373M). OSBC has higher P/E ratio than CZFS: OSBC (15.14) vs CZFS (9.07). CZFS YTD gains are higher at: 38.140 vs. OSBC (30.954). CZFS has less debt than OSBC: CZFS (199M) vs OSBC (300M). OSBC has higher revenues than CZFS: OSBC (354M) vs CZFS (116M).
CZFSOSBCCZFS / OSBC
Capitalization373M1.29B29%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD38.14030.954123%
P/E Ratio9.0715.1460%
Revenue116M354M33%
Total CashN/A48.1M-
Total Debt199M300M66%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CZFS vs OSBC: Fundamental Ratings
CZFS
OSBC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2744
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6018
SMR RATING
1..100
5947
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3939
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4814
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CZFS's Valuation (29) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OSBC (69) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CZFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than OSBC’s over the last 12 months.

OSBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CZFS (60) in the null industry. This means that OSBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CZFS’s over the last 12 months.

OSBC's SMR Rating (47) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CZFS (59) in the null industry. This means that OSBC’s stock grew similarly to CZFS’s over the last 12 months.

OSBC's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CZFS (39) in the null industry. This means that OSBC’s stock grew similarly to CZFS’s over the last 12 months.

OSBC's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CZFS (48) in the null industry. This means that OSBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CZFS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CZFSOSBC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CZFS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OSBC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AGTHX84.970.98
+1.17%
American Funds Growth Fd of Amer A
RBAIX29.820.05
+0.17%
T. Rowe Price Balanced I
PXIIX24.260.01
+0.04%
Virtus KAR Equity Income I
FEDAX22.36-0.10
-0.45%
Fidelity Advisor Emerg Mkts Discv A
HBSGX26.11-0.21
-0.80%
Hartford Small Cap Growth HLS IB

CZFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CZFS has been loosely correlated with BHB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CZFS jumps, then BHB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CZFS
1D Price
Change %
CZFS100%
+1.49%
BHB - CZFS
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.74%
OSBC - CZFS
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.08%
HBT - CZFS
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.06%
PFIS - CZFS
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.05%
CTBI - CZFS
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.49%
More