CZR
Price
$21.32
Change
+$1.41 (+7.08%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
Capitalization
4.36B
94 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FLL
Price
$2.49
Change
+$0.07 (+2.89%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
Capitalization
89.94M
108 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CZR vs FLL

Header iconCZR vs FLL Comparison
Open Charts CZR vs FLLBanner chart's image
Caesars Entertainment
Price$21.32
Change+$1.41 (+7.08%)
Volume$11.06M
Capitalization4.36B
Full House Resorts
Price$2.49
Change+$0.07 (+2.89%)
Volume$249.83K
Capitalization89.94M
CZR vs FLL Comparison Chart in %
CZR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FLL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CZR vs. FLL commentary
Nov 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZR is a Hold and FLL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 22, 2025
Stock price -- (CZR: $21.35 vs. FLL: $2.49)
Brand notoriety: CZR and FLL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CZR: 108% vs. FLL: 136%
Market capitalization -- CZR: $4.36B vs. FLL: $89.94M
CZR [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] is valued at $4.36B. FLL’s [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] market capitalization is $89.94M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry ranges from $43.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry is $5.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CZR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFLL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CZR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FLL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FLL is a better buy in the long-term than CZR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CZR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FLL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CZR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FLL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FLL is a better buy in the short-term than CZR.

Price Growth

CZR (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) experienced а +7.94% price change this week, while FLL (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) price change was +4.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was -1.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

CZR is expected to report earnings on Feb 24, 2026.

FLL is expected to report earnings on Mar 10, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (-1.27% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CZR($4.36B) has a higher market cap than FLL($89.9M). CZR YTD gains are higher at: -36.116 vs. FLL (-38.971). CZR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.6B vs. FLL (41.4M). CZR has more cash in the bank: 836M vs. FLL (32.1M). FLL has less debt than CZR: FLL (525M) vs CZR (24.9B). CZR has higher revenues than FLL: CZR (11.4B) vs FLL (298M).
CZRFLLCZR / FLL
Capitalization4.36B89.9M4,848%
EBITDA3.6B41.4M8,686%
Gain YTD-36.116-38.97193%
P/E Ratio10.42N/A-
Revenue11.4B298M3,826%
Total Cash836M32.1M2,604%
Total Debt24.9B525M4,743%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CZR vs FLL: Fundamental Ratings
CZR
FLL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
717
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10097
SMR RATING
1..100
8897
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6586
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
887
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FLL's Valuation (67) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as CZR (86). This means that FLL’s stock grew similarly to CZR’s over the last 12 months.

FLL's Profit vs Risk Rating (97) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as CZR (100). This means that FLL’s stock grew similarly to CZR’s over the last 12 months.

CZR's SMR Rating (88) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as FLL (97). This means that CZR’s stock grew similarly to FLL’s over the last 12 months.

CZR's Price Growth Rating (65) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as FLL (86). This means that CZR’s stock grew similarly to FLL’s over the last 12 months.

FLL's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is significantly better than the same rating for CZR (88). This means that FLL’s stock grew significantly faster than CZR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CZRFLL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CZR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FLL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MEIKX51.940.70
+1.37%
MFS Value R6
RRSCX27.450.34
+1.25%
Russell Inv Global Real Estate Secs C
FICCX76.27N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Canada I
JDURX16.80N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Utility R
STRBX20.05N/A
N/A
Sterling Capital Behav Sm Cp Val Eq R6

CZR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CZR has been closely correlated with MGM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CZR jumps, then MGM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CZR
1D Price
Change %
CZR100%
+7.23%
MGM - CZR
72%
Closely correlated
+5.82%
BYD - CZR
71%
Closely correlated
+3.49%
PENN - CZR
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.33%
RRR - CZR
63%
Loosely correlated
+2.65%
INSE - CZR
63%
Loosely correlated
+3.62%
More

FLL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLL has been loosely correlated with GDEN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLL jumps, then GDEN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLL
1D Price
Change %
FLL100%
+2.89%
GDEN - FLL
45%
Loosely correlated
+2.64%
CZR - FLL
45%
Loosely correlated
+7.23%
INSE - FLL
44%
Loosely correlated
+3.62%
BYD - FLL
39%
Loosely correlated
+3.49%
MGM - FLL
38%
Loosely correlated
+5.82%
More