| DBEF | IEFA | DBEF / IEFA | |
| Gain YTD | 16.026 | 14.578 | 110% |
| Net Assets | 9.38B | 195B | 5% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.07 | 500% |
| Turnover | 12.00 | 3.00 | 400% |
| Yield | 2.27 | 3.35 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 14 years | - |
| DBEF | IEFA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 83% | 11 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 66% | 6 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 78% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| NPFI | 25.88 | 0.01 | +0.04% |
| Nuveen Preferred and Income ETF | |||
| PSCQ | 31.86 | N/A | N/A |
| Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (Oct) ETF | |||
| GVIP | 172.77 | -0.55 | -0.32% |
| Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF | |||
| SPLV | 75.31 | -0.35 | -0.46% |
| Invesco S&P 500® Low Volatility ETF | |||
| BABU | 11.02 | -2.30 | -17.27% |
| Direxion Daily BABA Bull 2X ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DBEF has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DBEF jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DBEF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DBEF | 100% | +0.65% | ||
| STM - DBEF | 77% Closely correlated | +1.28% | ||
| SAN - DBEF | 74% Closely correlated | +2.67% | ||
| MT - DBEF | 70% Closely correlated | +1.53% | ||
| BBVA - DBEF | 68% Closely correlated | +1.43% | ||
| NWG - DBEF | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.69% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IEFA has been loosely correlated with ASML. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IEFA jumps, then ASML could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IEFA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IEFA | 100% | +0.86% | ||
| ASML - IEFA | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.77% | ||
| SAP - IEFA | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.73% | ||
| SHEL - IEFA | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| ROG - IEFA | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.01% | ||
| MC - IEFA | 45% Loosely correlated | +2.12% | ||
More | ||||