NWG | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 89 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 18 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 7 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 5 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| IEFA | NWG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 56% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 55% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 21 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 77% | 14 days ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 36% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IEFA has been closely correlated with SAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IEFA jumps, then SAN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IEFA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IEFA | 100% | +0.41% | ||
| SAN - IEFA | 75% Closely correlated | -0.89% | ||
| BBVA - IEFA | 72% Closely correlated | -0.83% | ||
| NWG - IEFA | 68% Closely correlated | -2.01% | ||
| BHP - IEFA | 67% Closely correlated | +2.02% | ||
| ASML - IEFA | 63% Loosely correlated | +2.14% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NWG has been closely correlated with LYG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NWG jumps, then LYG could also see price increases.