Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFSVX vs RSQCX
DFSVX vs RSQCX Comparison
Open Charts DFSVX vs RSQCX
DFSVX vs RSQCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFSVX vs. RSQCX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFSVX is a Buy and RSQCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFSVX has more cash in the bank: 18.7B vs. RSQCX (473M). DFSVX pays higher dividends than RSQCX: DFSVX (1.51) vs RSQCX (1.32). DFSVX was incepted earlier than RSQCX: DFSVX (33 years) vs RSQCX (23 years). RSQCX (2.45) is less costly to investors than DFSVX (0.31). RSQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 12.00 vs. DFSVX (7.00). DFSVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSQCX: DFSVX (0) vs RSQCX (2000). DFSVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.29 vs. RSQCX (22.94). DFSVX return over 5 years is better than : 36.39 vs. RSQCX (-18.09).
| DFSVX | RSQCX | DFSVX / RSQCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 2.24 | 14% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 2.45 | 13% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.319 | 18.991 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.7B | 473M | 3,953% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.51 | 1.32 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | 37.29 | 22.94 | 163% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.26 | 4.43 | 1,384% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.39 | -18.09 | -201% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.56 | -11.75 | -864% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement