Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFSVX vs RSQCX
DFSVX vs RSQCX Comparison
Open Charts DFSVX vs RSQCX
DFSVX vs RSQCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFSVX vs. RSQCX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFSVX is a Buy and RSQCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFSVX has more cash in the bank: 19.7B vs. RSQCX (485M). DFSVX pays higher dividends than RSQCX: DFSVX (1.50) vs RSQCX (1.23). DFSVX was incepted earlier than RSQCX: DFSVX (34 years) vs RSQCX (23 years). RSQCX (2.45) is less costly to investors than DFSVX (0.31). RSQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 12.00 vs. DFSVX (7.00). DFSVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSQCX: DFSVX (0) vs RSQCX (2000). DFSVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.95 vs. RSQCX (13.30). DFSVX return over 5 years is better than : 51.99 vs. RSQCX (-12.23).
| DFSVX | RSQCX | DFSVX / RSQCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 2.24 | 14% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 2.45 | 13% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.629 | 24.429 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.7B | 485M | 4,062% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.50 | 1.23 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.95 | 13.30 | 173% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.55 | 9.86 | 604% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.99 | -12.23 | -425% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.66 | -10.27 | -1,028% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement