Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFSVX vs RSQCX
DFSVX vs RSQCX Comparison
Open Charts DFSVX vs RSQCX
DFSVX vs RSQCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFSVX vs. RSQCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFSVX is a Buy and RSQCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFSVX has more cash in the bank: 19.1B vs. RSQCX (480M). DFSVX pays higher dividends than RSQCX: DFSVX (1.54) vs RSQCX (1.29). DFSVX was incepted earlier than RSQCX: DFSVX (33 years) vs RSQCX (23 years). RSQCX (2.45) is less costly to investors than DFSVX (0.31). RSQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 12.00 vs. DFSVX (7.00). DFSVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSQCX: DFSVX (0) vs RSQCX (2000). DFSVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.77 vs. RSQCX (16.92). DFSVX return over 5 years is better than : 49.27 vs. RSQCX (-12.63).
| DFSVX | RSQCX | DFSVX / RSQCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 2.24 | 14% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 2.45 | 13% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.935 | 22.143 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.1B | 480M | 3,979% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.54 | 1.29 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.77 | 16.92 | 164% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.48 | 3.13 | 1,739% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.27 | -12.63 | -390% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.33 | -12.68 | -783% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers