Investors seeking comprehensive U.S. equity exposure often compare broad-market ETFs such as DFUS and VTI. These funds compete directly for core portfolio allocations, each delivering diversified access to thousands of U.S. companies across market-capitalization ranges. The comparison remains relevant amid ongoing interest-rate expectations and technology-driven market leadership, as both vehicles target similar long-term capital-appreciation goals with differing implementation approaches.
The Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF (DFUS) seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing in a broad selection of U.S. equities weighted by market capitalization. It holds approximately 2,200 securities and maintains an expense ratio of 0.09%. Top holdings typically include major technology names such as NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, and Alphabet. Sector allocations mirror the market with technology comprising the largest weight, followed by financials and consumer discretionary. The fund employs a passive strategy augmented by Dimensional’s systematic selection process, emphasizing tax efficiency through its structure as a mutual-fund conversion vehicle.
The Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) tracks a comprehensive U.S. equity index covering nearly all publicly traded domestic stocks. It holds more than 3,500 securities and features an expense ratio of 0.03%. Top holdings closely resemble the market leaders, including NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, and Alphabet. Sector weights are dominated by technology at approximately 35-40%, with meaningful allocations to financials, industrials, and health care. The fund follows a fully passive, market-capitalization-weighted methodology with full replication of the CRSP U.S. Total Market Index, delivering maximum breadth at minimal cost.
The U.S. equity market continues to be shaped by technology innovation, artificial-intelligence adoption, and shifting interest-rate expectations. Capital flows remain concentrated in large-cap growth sectors while small- and mid-cap segments experience periodic rotation. Regulatory developments around antitrust and data privacy affect technology holdings, and macroeconomic factors such as inflation trends and corporate earnings cycles influence overall sector performance. Both ETFs provide exposure to these dynamics without thematic concentration, positioning investors for broad participation in economic expansion or contraction phases.
In recent weeks and months, both ETFs have tracked closely with large-cap technology performance amid earnings cycles and interest-rate developments. DFUS’s slightly more concentrated holdings can produce modest outperformance or underperformance relative to VTI during periods of sector rotation. Volatility profiles remain similar, reflecting shared sensitivity to macroeconomic shifts and geopolitical events. Over broader market cycles, the lower expense ratio of VTI provides a compounding advantage, while DFUS’s tax-management features may benefit taxable investors during rebalancing events.
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore opportunities with the AI Screener.
Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modest preference to VTI for most investors due to its lower expense ratio, greater number of holdings, and full-market replication. DFUS remains competitive for taxable accounts seeking tax-efficiency benefits and may suit investors comfortable with Dimensional’s systematic methodology. The choice ultimately depends on individual priorities around cost, tax considerations, and desired breadth of exposure.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| DFUS | VTI | DFUS / VTI | |
| Gain YTD | 12.714 | 12.060 | 105% |
| Net Assets | 21.5B | 2.34T | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.09 | 0.03 | 300% |
| Turnover | 3.00 | 3.00 | 100% |
| Yield | 0.84 | 1.03 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 25 years | - |
| DFUS | VTI | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 82% | 7 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SILJ | 31.94 | 0.39 | +1.24% |
| Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF | |||
| ZFEB | 26.30 | -0.02 | -0.08% |
| Innovator Equity Defined Prt ETF -1YrFeb | |||
| DUKX | 29.18 | -0.18 | -0.60% |
| Ocean Park International ETF | |||
| DIVS | 33.79 | -0.46 | -1.34% |
| Guinness Atkinson Dividend Builder ETF | |||
| NVDU | 141.27 | -2.84 | -1.97% |
| Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DFUS has been loosely correlated with AVGO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DFUS jumps, then AVGO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DFUS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFUS | 100% | -0.48% | ||
| AVGO - DFUS | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.13% | ||
| MSFT - DFUS | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.47% | ||
| AAPL - DFUS | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.28% | ||
| AMZN - DFUS | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.78% | ||
| META - DFUS | 58% Loosely correlated | +6.55% | ||
More | ||||