DFUS
Price
$83.20
Change
-$0.40 (-0.48%)
Updated
Sep 9 closing price
Net Assets
21.51B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VTI
Price
$375.56
Change
-$2.04 (-0.54%)
Updated
Sep 9 closing price
Net Assets
2.34T
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

DFUS vs VTI

DFUS vs VTI Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF (DFUS) vs. Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI)

Key Takeaways

  • Both DFUS and VTI provide broad exposure to the U.S. equity market but differ in construction methodology, with DFUS employing a more selective approach within a market-capitalization framework and VTI offering near-complete market coverage.
  • VTI maintains a lower expense ratio of 0.03% compared to 0.09% for DFUS, creating a structural cost advantage for long-term buy-and-hold investors.
  • DFUS holds approximately 2,200 securities while VTI includes over 3,500 holdings, resulting in modestly different diversification profiles across market-capitalization segments.
  • Sector allocations for both ETFs are closely aligned with the broader market, featuring heavy technology weighting around 35-40%, followed by financials and consumer discretionary, reflecting similar exposure to economic cycles.
  • DFUS incorporates tax-efficient design elements from its issuer, which may appeal to taxable accounts, whereas VTI emphasizes ultra-low costs and maximum breadth.
  • In recent market cycles, both funds have exhibited comparable volatility tied to large-cap technology performance, though slight differences in holdings can influence relative positioning during sector rotations.

Introduction

Investors seeking comprehensive U.S. equity exposure often compare broad-market ETFs such as DFUS and VTI. These funds compete directly for core portfolio allocations, each delivering diversified access to thousands of U.S. companies across market-capitalization ranges. The comparison remains relevant amid ongoing interest-rate expectations and technology-driven market leadership, as both vehicles target similar long-term capital-appreciation goals with differing implementation approaches.

Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF (DFUS) Overview

The Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF (DFUS) seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing in a broad selection of U.S. equities weighted by market capitalization. It holds approximately 2,200 securities and maintains an expense ratio of 0.09%. Top holdings typically include major technology names such as NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, and Alphabet. Sector allocations mirror the market with technology comprising the largest weight, followed by financials and consumer discretionary. The fund employs a passive strategy augmented by Dimensional’s systematic selection process, emphasizing tax efficiency through its structure as a mutual-fund conversion vehicle.

Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) Overview

The Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) tracks a comprehensive U.S. equity index covering nearly all publicly traded domestic stocks. It holds more than 3,500 securities and features an expense ratio of 0.03%. Top holdings closely resemble the market leaders, including NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, and Alphabet. Sector weights are dominated by technology at approximately 35-40%, with meaningful allocations to financials, industrials, and health care. The fund follows a fully passive, market-capitalization-weighted methodology with full replication of the CRSP U.S. Total Market Index, delivering maximum breadth at minimal cost.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The U.S. equity market continues to be shaped by technology innovation, artificial-intelligence adoption, and shifting interest-rate expectations. Capital flows remain concentrated in large-cap growth sectors while small- and mid-cap segments experience periodic rotation. Regulatory developments around antitrust and data privacy affect technology holdings, and macroeconomic factors such as inflation trends and corporate earnings cycles influence overall sector performance. Both ETFs provide exposure to these dynamics without thematic concentration, positioning investors for broad participation in economic expansion or contraction phases.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent weeks and months, both ETFs have tracked closely with large-cap technology performance amid earnings cycles and interest-rate developments. DFUS’s slightly more concentrated holdings can produce modest outperformance or underperformance relative to VTI during periods of sector rotation. Volatility profiles remain similar, reflecting shared sensitivity to macroeconomic shifts and geopolitical events. Over broader market cycles, the lower expense ratio of VTI provides a compounding advantage, while DFUS’s tax-management features may benefit taxable investors during rebalancing events.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore opportunities with the AI Screener.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modest preference to VTI for most investors due to its lower expense ratio, greater number of holdings, and full-market replication. DFUS remains competitive for taxable accounts seeking tax-efficiency benefits and may suit investors comfortable with Dimensional’s systematic methodology. The choice ultimately depends on individual priorities around cost, tax considerations, and desired breadth of exposure.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
DFUS vs. VTI commentary
Sep 10, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFUS is a Hold and VTI is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTI has more net assets: 2.34T vs. DFUS (21.5B). DFUS has a higher annual dividend yield than VTI: DFUS (12.714) vs VTI (12.060). DFUS was incepted earlier than VTI: DFUS (25 years) vs VTI (25 years). VTI (0.03) has a lower expense ratio than DFUS (0.09). DFUS (3.00) and VTI (3.00) have matching turnover.
DFUSVTIDFUS / VTI
Gain YTD12.71412.060105%
Net Assets21.5B2.34T1%
Total Expense Ratio0.090.03300%
Turnover3.003.00100%
Yield0.841.0382%
Fund Existence25 years25 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DFUSVTI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
DFUS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VTI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SILJ31.940.39
+1.24%
Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF
ZFEB26.30-0.02
-0.08%
Innovator Equity Defined Prt ETF -1YrFeb
DUKX29.18-0.18
-0.60%
Ocean Park International ETF
DIVS33.79-0.46
-1.34%
Guinness Atkinson Dividend Builder ETF
NVDU141.27-2.84
-1.97%
Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares

DFUS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DFUS has been loosely correlated with AVGO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DFUS jumps, then AVGO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DFUS
1D Price
Change %
DFUS100%
-0.48%
AVGO - DFUS
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.13%
MSFT - DFUS
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.47%
AAPL - DFUS
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.28%
AMZN - DFUS
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.78%
META - DFUS
58%
Loosely correlated
+6.55%
More