Advertisement
DKL vs GLNG
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DKL is a StrongBuy and GLNG is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DKL’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileGLNG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- DKL’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- GLNG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DKL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GLNG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- DKL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- GLNG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
DKL (@Oil Refining/Marketing) experienced а +1.22% price change this week, while GLNG (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was -2.82% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil Refining/Marketing industry was -0.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +35.69%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +0.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.24%.
Reported Earning Dates
DKL is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
GLNG is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Oil Refining/Marketing (-0.27% weekly)The Oil Refining/Marketing segment includes companies that refine crude oil into a number of petroleum products, including gasoline, jet fuel and diesel, and then sell the usable products to the end users. These companies are involved in what’s called downstream operations in the oil business. They also engage in the marketing and distribution of crude oil and natural gas products. In other words, the downstream oil and gas business is focused on post-production processes of crude oil and natural gas. When oil prices slump, downstream businesses are hurt less or in some cases even benefit, since their purchase cost of crude oil goes down. Some of the biggest U.S. oil refining/marketing companies include Phillips 66, Marathon Petroleum Corporation and Valero Energy Corp.
@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+0.24% weekly)Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.
| DKL | GLNG | DKL / GLNG | |
| Capitalization | 3.17B | 5.13B | 62% |
| EBITDA | 494M | 366M | 135% |
| Gain YTD | 30.604 | 37.219 | 82% |
| P/E Ratio | 18.96 | 34.45 | 55% |
| Revenue | 1.06B | 523M | 203% |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 2.33B | 2.73B | 85% |
DKL | GLNG | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 62 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 93 Overvalued | 31 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 25 | 8 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 6 | 77 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 21 | 94 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GLNG's Valuation (31) in the Marine Shipping industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DKL (93) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that GLNG’s stock grew somewhat faster than DKL’s over the last 12 months.
GLNG's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as DKL (25) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that GLNG’s stock grew similarly to DKL’s over the last 12 months.
DKL's SMR Rating (6) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is significantly better than the same rating for GLNG (77) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that DKL’s stock grew significantly faster than GLNG’s over the last 12 months.
DKL's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as GLNG (47) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that DKL’s stock grew similarly to GLNG’s over the last 12 months.
DKL's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is significantly better than the same rating for GLNG (94) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that DKL’s stock grew significantly faster than GLNG’s over the last 12 months.
| DKL | GLNG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 57% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 51% | 3 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 47% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 17 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 52% | 7 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 7 days ago 73% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MULL | 20.34 | 0.09 | +0.44% |
| GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF | |||
| CRED | 19.74 | N/A | N/A |
| Columbia Research Enhanced Real Estate ETF | |||
| EEMV | 75.71 | -0.09 | -0.12% |
| iShares MSCI Emerg Mkts Min Vol Fctr ETF | |||
| AADR | 83.45 | -0.71 | -0.85% |
| AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF | |||
| RVER | 35.98 | -1.06 | -2.85% |
| Trenchless Fund ETF | |||
GLNG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLNG has been loosely correlated with LNG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GLNG jumps, then LNG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GLNG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLNG | 100% | -2.37% | ||
| LNG - GLNG | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.54% | ||
| DKL - GLNG | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| MPLX - GLNG | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.44% | ||
| BWLP - GLNG | 34% Loosely correlated | -1.93% | ||
| ET - GLNG | 33% Poorly correlated | -0.33% | ||
More | ||||