DPZ
Price
$448.96
Change
-$3.59 (-0.79%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
15.24B
41 days until earnings call
YUMC
Price
$44.58
Change
-$0.02 (-0.04%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
16.38B
67 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

DPZ vs YUMC

Header iconDPZ vs YUMC Comparison
Open Charts DPZ vs YUMCBanner chart's image
Dominos Pizza
Price$448.96
Change-$3.59 (-0.79%)
Volume$477.35K
Capitalization15.24B
Yum China Holdings
Price$44.58
Change-$0.02 (-0.04%)
Volume$1.56M
Capitalization16.38B
DPZ vs YUMC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DPZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
YUMC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DPZ vs. YUMC commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DPZ is a StrongBuy and YUMC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (DPZ: $448.96 vs. YUMC: $44.58)
Brand notoriety: DPZ and YUMC are both notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DPZ: 71% vs. YUMC: 80%
Market capitalization -- DPZ: $15.24B vs. YUMC: $16.38B
DPZ [@Restaurants] is valued at $15.24B. YUMC’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $16.38B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $222.8B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DPZ’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileYUMC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DPZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • YUMC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, YUMC is a better buy in the long-term than DPZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DPZ’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while YUMC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DPZ’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • YUMC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, YUMC is a better buy in the short-term than DPZ.

Price Growth

DPZ (@Restaurants) experienced а +0.47% price change this week, while YUMC (@Restaurants) price change was -1.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

DPZ is expected to report earnings on Oct 09, 2025.

YUMC is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.62% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
YUMC($16.4B) has a higher market cap than DPZ($15.2B). DPZ has higher P/E ratio than YUMC: DPZ (26.07) vs YUMC (18.42). DPZ YTD gains are higher at: 7.808 vs. YUMC (-6.491). YUMC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.73B vs. DPZ (1.05B). YUMC has more cash in the bank: 2.16B vs. DPZ (273M). YUMC has less debt than DPZ: YUMC (2.23B) vs DPZ (5.21B). YUMC has higher revenues than DPZ: YUMC (11.4B) vs DPZ (4.78B).
DPZYUMCDPZ / YUMC
Capitalization15.2B16.4B93%
EBITDA1.05B1.73B61%
Gain YTD7.808-6.491-120%
P/E Ratio26.0718.42142%
Revenue4.78B11.4B42%
Total Cash273M2.16B13%
Total Debt5.21B2.23B234%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DPZ vs YUMC: Fundamental Ratings
DPZ
YUMC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
138
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
74100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6157
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

YUMC's Valuation (36) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DPZ (74). This means that YUMC’s stock grew somewhat faster than DPZ’s over the last 12 months.

DPZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (74) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as YUMC (100). This means that DPZ’s stock grew similarly to YUMC’s over the last 12 months.

DPZ's SMR Rating (100) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as YUMC (100). This means that DPZ’s stock grew similarly to YUMC’s over the last 12 months.

YUMC's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as DPZ (61). This means that YUMC’s stock grew similarly to DPZ’s over the last 12 months.

YUMC's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as DPZ (100). This means that YUMC’s stock grew similarly to DPZ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DPZYUMC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DPZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
YUMC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DAPP17.710.20
+1.14%
VanEck Digital Trfmt ETF
RDTE33.830.09
+0.27%
Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTECovCllStgyETF
USTB50.94N/A
N/A
VictoryShares Short-Term Bond ETF
BAMU25.42N/A
-0.02%
Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF
BZQ10.00-0.34
-3.27%
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped

DPZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DPZ has been loosely correlated with YUM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DPZ jumps, then YUM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DPZ
1D Price
Change %
DPZ100%
-0.79%
YUM - DPZ
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.10%
QSR - DPZ
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.67%
FRSH - DPZ
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.59%
CNNE - DPZ
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CAKE - DPZ
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.21%
More

YUMC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, YUMC has been loosely correlated with YUM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if YUMC jumps, then YUM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To YUMC
1D Price
Change %
YUMC100%
-0.04%
YUM - YUMC
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.10%
HDL - YUMC
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DPZ - YUMC
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.79%
QSR - YUMC
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.67%
ARCO - YUMC
31%
Poorly correlated
+2.73%
More