Advertisement
DSWL vs LFUS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DSWL is a Hold and LFUS is a Hold.
| DSWL | LFUS | DSWL / LFUS | |
| Capitalization | 47.8M | 11B | 0% |
| EBITDA | 4.82M | 247M | 2% |
| Gain YTD | -5.485 | 71.915 | -8% |
| P/E Ratio | 4.49 | 62.35 | 7% |
| Revenue | 65.7M | 2.61B | 3% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 629M | - |
| Total Debt | 903K | 709M | 0% |
DSWL | LFUS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 51 | 10 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 2 Undervalued | 67 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 97 | 51 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 64 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 72 | 7 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 37 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
DSWL's Valuation (2) in the Industrial Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LFUS (67) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that DSWL’s stock grew somewhat faster than LFUS’s over the last 12 months.
LFUS's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the Electrical Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DSWL (97) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that LFUS’s stock grew somewhat faster than DSWL’s over the last 12 months.
DSWL's SMR Rating (64) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as LFUS (91) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that DSWL’s stock grew similarly to LFUS’s over the last 12 months.
LFUS's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as DSWL (58) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that LFUS’s stock grew similarly to DSWL’s over the last 12 months.
LFUS's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Electrical Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DSWL (72) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that LFUS’s stock grew somewhat faster than DSWL’s over the last 12 months.
| DSWL | LFUS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 4 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 67% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DSWL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while LFUS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- DSWL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- LFUS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DSWL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LFUS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- DSWL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- LFUS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
DSWL (@Electronic Components) experienced а -4.44% price change this week, while LFUS (@Electronic Components) price change was +3.16% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was -1.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.16%.
Reported Earning Dates
LFUS is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronic Components (-1.04% weekly)The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.
Advertisement
DSWL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that DSWL and JBL have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DSWL and JBL's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DSWL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DSWL | 100% | -4.14% | ||
| JBL - DSWL | 21% Poorly correlated | +5.05% | ||
| ALNT - DSWL | 21% Poorly correlated | +4.76% | ||
| LFUS - DSWL | 20% Poorly correlated | +4.57% | ||
| BELFA - DSWL | 20% Poorly correlated | +3.27% | ||
| TTMI - DSWL | 15% Poorly correlated | +3.35% | ||
More | ||||
LFUS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LFUS has been closely correlated with KN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LFUS jumps, then KN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LFUS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LFUS | 100% | +4.57% | ||
| KN - LFUS | 69% Closely correlated | +4.26% | ||
| PLXS - LFUS | 68% Closely correlated | +3.40% | ||
| BHE - LFUS | 68% Closely correlated | +5.16% | ||
| TTMI - LFUS | 64% Loosely correlated | +3.35% | ||
| CTS - LFUS | 63% Loosely correlated | +2.75% | ||
More | ||||