Advertisement
DYNF vs LRCX
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DYNF is a StrongBuy and LRCX is a Buy.
LRCX | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 36 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 2 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 17 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 6 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| DYNF | LRCX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 64% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 76% | 10 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 81% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CLSM | 27.36 | 0.18 | +0.65% |
| ETC Cabana Target Leading Sector Mod ETF | |||
| NEAR | 50.61 | -0.01 | -0.03% |
| iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF | |||
| XBB | 40.90 | -0.02 | -0.05% |
| BondBloxx BB Rated USD HY Corp Bd ETF | |||
| TRUD | 25.68 | -0.03 | -0.10% |
| VanEck Consumer Disc TruSector ETF | |||
| EZET | 12.61 | -0.13 | -1.02% |
| Franklin Ethereum ETF | |||
DYNF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DYNF has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DYNF jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DYNF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DYNF | 100% | +0.57% | ||
| LRCX - DYNF | 70% Closely correlated | +1.18% | ||
| GS - DYNF | 70% Closely correlated | +2.62% | ||
| MS - DYNF | 68% Closely correlated | +0.65% | ||
| NVDA - DYNF | 68% Closely correlated | +0.16% | ||
| C - DYNF | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.27% | ||
More | ||||
LRCX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LRCX has been closely correlated with AMAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LRCX jumps, then AMAT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LRCX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LRCX | 100% | +1.18% | ||
| AMAT - LRCX | 88% Closely correlated | +2.64% | ||
| KLAC - LRCX | 86% Closely correlated | +5.55% | ||
| NVMI - LRCX | 81% Closely correlated | +4.19% | ||
| ASML - LRCX | 81% Closely correlated | -1.89% | ||
| RMBS - LRCX | 80% Closely correlated | +1.45% | ||
More | ||||