EAF
Price
$7.44
Change
+$0.34 (+4.79%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
193.8M
97 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RUN
Price
$9.94
Change
-$0.44 (-4.24%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
2.37B
11 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EAF vs RUN

EAF vs RUN Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EAF vs. RUN commentary
Jul 25, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EAF is a Buy and RUN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 25, 2026
Stock price -- (EAF: $7.44 vs. RUN: $9.94)
Brand notoriety: EAF: Notable vs. RUN: Not notable
EAF represents the Electrical Products, while RUN is part of the Alternative Power Generation industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EAF: 152% vs. RUN: 95%
Market capitalization -- EAF: $193.8M vs. RUN: $2.37B
EAF [@Electrical Products] is valued at $193.8M. RUN’s [@Alternative Power Generation] market capitalization is $2.37B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electrical Products] industry ranges from $300.34B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Alternative Power Generation] industry ranges from $118.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electrical Products] industry is $5.8B. The average market capitalization across the [@Alternative Power Generation] industry is $2.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRUN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RUN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, EAF is a better buy in the long-term than RUN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EAF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RUN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RUN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both EAF and RUN are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

EAF (@Electrical Products) experienced а +7.36% price change this week, while RUN (@Alternative Power Generation) price change was -16.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electrical Products industry was -5.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -18.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was -20.77%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Alternative Power Generation industry was -3.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -13.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was -25.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

EAF is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2026.

RUN is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electrical Products (-5.18% weekly)

The industry produces a diverse range of electricity-powered equipment, appliances and components, catering to both households and industries. The products include power, distribution and specialty transformers; electric motors, generators and motor-generator sets; switchgear and switchboard apparatus; light bulbs, tubes, fittings and electric signs etc. Consumer income, construction spending, and industrial production are major drivers of demand for this industry’s products. Large companies tend to have economies of scale in production, marketing, and distribution, while smaller companies can potentially carve out their own market through niche or specialty offerings. The US electrical products manufacturing industry includes about 5,700 establishments (single-location companies and units of multi-location companies) with combined annual revenue of about $125 billion. (according to a study published in First Research). Emerson Electric Co., Hubbell Incorporated and Eaton Corporation plc are major electrical products makers in the U.S.

@Alternative Power Generation (-3.92% weekly)

The alternative power generation industry consists of companies that operate power facilities converting non-conventional forms of energy into electricity. These energy forms are alternatives to fossil fuels, and many of them are derived from natural resources. Alternative energy forms include solar, wind, hydro, and geothermal steam. A major purpose behind using alternative energy – also called ‘clean’ energy - is to address concerns related to the more conventional fossil fuels, such as the latter’s high carbon dioxide emissions which is often considered a factor in global warming. Alternative power generation has been gaining traction in recent years, and could grow further in the future. Large organizations like Google have invested substantially in wind and solar energy-powered electricity. Some of the prominent U.S. companies operating in the alternative power generation industry includes Ormat Technologies, Inc., TerraForm Power, Inc. and NextEra Energy Partners LP.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RUN($2.37B) has a higher market cap than EAF($194M). RUN YTD gains are higher at: -45.978 vs. EAF (-52.031). RUN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 700M vs. EAF (-8.2M). RUN has more cash in the bank: 680M vs. EAF (120M). EAF has less debt than RUN: EAF (1.1B) vs RUN (14.9B). RUN has higher revenues than EAF: RUN (3.18B) vs EAF (517M).
EAFRUNEAF / RUN
Capitalization194M2.37B8%
EBITDA-8.2M700M-1%
Gain YTD-52.031-45.978113%
P/E RatioN/A4.67-
Revenue517M3.18B16%
Total Cash120M680M18%
Total Debt1.1B14.9B7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EAF vs RUN: Fundamental Ratings
EAF
RUN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2657
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
61
Fair valued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10047
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6580
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
384
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a37

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EAF's Valuation (61) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as RUN (87). This means that EAF’s stock grew similarly to RUN’s over the last 12 months.

EAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as RUN (100). This means that EAF’s stock grew similarly to RUN’s over the last 12 months.

RUN's SMR Rating (47) in the Electrical Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EAF (100). This means that RUN’s stock grew somewhat faster than EAF’s over the last 12 months.

EAF's Price Growth Rating (65) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as RUN (80). This means that EAF’s stock grew similarly to RUN’s over the last 12 months.

EAF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Electrical Products industry is significantly better than the same rating for RUN (84). This means that EAF’s stock grew significantly faster than RUN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EAFRUN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EAF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RUN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BETZ18.920.31
+1.65%
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF
TPLC50.440.41
+0.82%
Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core ETF
HYSD20.04-0.03
-0.14%
Columbia Short Duration High Yield ETF
DFEV39.96-0.57
-1.41%
Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF
KDEF39.67-0.75
-1.86%
Plus Korea Defense Industry Index ETF

EAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EAF has been loosely correlated with RUN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EAF jumps, then RUN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EAF
1D Price
Change %
EAF100%
+4.79%
RUN - EAF
34%
Loosely correlated
-4.24%
KE - EAF
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.20%
LTBR - EAF
29%
Poorly correlated
-6.60%
HAYW - EAF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
NVT - EAF
27%
Poorly correlated
-4.28%
More

RUN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RUN has been closely correlated with FCEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RUN jumps, then FCEL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RUN
1D Price
Change %
RUN100%
-4.24%
FCEL - RUN
67%
Closely correlated
-8.76%
BE - RUN
61%
Loosely correlated
-14.91%
PLUG - RUN
61%
Loosely correlated
-4.57%
ENPH - RUN
59%
Loosely correlated
-5.63%
FSLR - RUN
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.51%
More