Advertisement
EAF vs RUN
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EAF is a Hold and RUN is a Hold.
EAF's RSI Oscillator peaks and leaves overbought zone
The 10-day RSI Indicator for EAF moved out of overbought territory on September 28, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. Traders may want to look at selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 21 instances where the indicator moved out of the overbought zone. In 20 of the 21 cases the stock moved lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of a move down at 90%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 05, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on EAF as a result. In 69 of 79 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 87%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for EAF turned negative on October 01, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 44 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 40 of the 44 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 90%.
EAF moved below its 50-day moving average on October 14, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where EAF declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 88%.
EAF broke above its upper Bollinger Band on September 21, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for EAF entered a downward trend on September 15, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 1 day, which means it's wise to expect a price bounce in the near future.
The 10-day moving average for EAF crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on September 21, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 13 of 14 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.
Following a +6.55% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where EAF advanced for three days, in 228 of 285 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 80%.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 2 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 43 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. EAF’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 93 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: EAF's P/B Ratio (34.014) is very high in comparison to the industry average of (7.632). P/E Ratio (26.400) is within average values for comparable stocks, (54.807). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.220) is also within normal values, averaging (2.900). Dividend Yield (0.009) settles around the average of (0.005) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.414) is also within normal values, averaging (8.019).
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. EAF’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 86, placing this stock worse than average.
RUN in +1.30% Uptrend, rising for three consecutive days on September 30, 2026
Moving higher for three straight days is viewed as a bullish sign. Keep an eye on this stock for future growth. Considering data from situations where RUN advanced for three days, in 218 of 261 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 84%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 47 of 59 cases where RUN's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 80%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for RUN just turned positive on October 07, 2026. Looking at past instances where RUN's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 35 of 45 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 78%.
RUN may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 14, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on RUN as a result. In 83 of 97 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 86%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where RUN declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 87%.
The Aroon Indicator for RUN entered a downward trend on October 14, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 17 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 62 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 72 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 84 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.529) is normal, around the industry mean (4.841). P/E Ratio (5.218) is within average values for comparable stocks, (100.974). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (3.071) is also within normal values, averaging (1.699). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.013) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.646) is also within normal values, averaging (5.133).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 85 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. RUN’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. RUN’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 99, placing this stock worse than average.
EAF | RUN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 86 | 18 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 93 Overvalued | 84 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 62 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | 85 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | 72 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 17 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RUN's Valuation (84) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as EAF (93). This means that RUN’s stock grew similarly to EAF’s over the last 12 months.
RUN's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as EAF (100). This means that RUN’s stock grew similarly to EAF’s over the last 12 months.
RUN's SMR Rating (62) in the Electrical Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EAF (100). This means that RUN’s stock grew somewhat faster than EAF’s over the last 12 months.
EAF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Electrical Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RUN (85). This means that EAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RUN’s over the last 12 months.
EAF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Electrical Products industry is significantly better than the same rating for RUN (72). This means that EAF’s stock grew significantly faster than RUN’s over the last 12 months.
| EAF | RUN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 80% | 15 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 7 days ago 87% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 84% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while RUN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- EAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- RUN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EAF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RUN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- EAF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
- RUN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
EAF (@Electrical Products) experienced а -9.59% price change this week, while RUN (@Alternative Power Generation) price change was -4.14% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electrical Products industry was -12.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -14.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was -25.56%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Alternative Power Generation industry was -7.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was -36.30%.
Reported Earning Dates
EAF is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2026.
RUN is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electrical Products (-12.13% weekly)The industry produces a diverse range of electricity-powered equipment, appliances and components, catering to both households and industries. The products include power, distribution and specialty transformers; electric motors, generators and motor-generator sets; switchgear and switchboard apparatus; light bulbs, tubes, fittings and electric signs etc. Consumer income, construction spending, and industrial production are major drivers of demand for this industry’s products. Large companies tend to have economies of scale in production, marketing, and distribution, while smaller companies can potentially carve out their own market through niche or specialty offerings. The US electrical products manufacturing industry includes about 5,700 establishments (single-location companies and units of multi-location companies) with combined annual revenue of about $125 billion. (according to a study published in First Research). Emerson Electric Co., Hubbell Incorporated and Eaton Corporation plc are major electrical products makers in the U.S.
@Alternative Power Generation (-7.92% weekly)The alternative power generation industry consists of companies that operate power facilities converting non-conventional forms of energy into electricity. These energy forms are alternatives to fossil fuels, and many of them are derived from natural resources. Alternative energy forms include solar, wind, hydro, and geothermal steam. A major purpose behind using alternative energy – also called ‘clean’ energy - is to address concerns related to the more conventional fossil fuels, such as the latter’s high carbon dioxide emissions which is often considered a factor in global warming. Alternative power generation has been gaining traction in recent years, and could grow further in the future. Large organizations like Google have invested substantially in wind and solar energy-powered electricity. Some of the prominent U.S. companies operating in the alternative power generation industry includes Ormat Technologies, Inc., TerraForm Power, Inc. and NextEra Energy Partners LP.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DIVO | 47.55 | 0.02 | +0.04% |
| Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) | |||
| ENHU | 28.67 | -0.33 | -1.13% |
| iShares Enhanced Large Cap Core Active ETF (ENHU) | |||
| ADIV | 19.36 | -0.31 | -1.58% |
| Guinness Atkinson Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF (ADIV) | |||
| EMMF | 36.75 | -0.64 | -1.72% |
| WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund (EMMF) | |||
| FFLG | 33.41 | -0.84 | -2.45% |
| Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF (FFLG) | |||
What Rights Does Owning Shares of Corporation Give You?
FAQ: How is the stop loss determined for the AI robots?
Analyzing the Ascending Triangle (Bearish) Pattern in Stock Trading
The AI Power Demand Report: 10 Stocks and 10 ETFs Built for the Data Center Supercycle Through 2030
Margins Don't Lie: Tickeron AI's 24 Highest-Quality, Highest-Gross-Margin Stocks and Their Price Targets
EAF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EAF has been loosely correlated with RUN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EAF jumps, then RUN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EAF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EAF | 100% | -5.85% | ||
| RUN - EAF | 34% Loosely correlated | -6.35% | ||
| NVT - EAF | 31% Poorly correlated | -5.42% | ||
| LTBR - EAF | 29% Poorly correlated | -10.11% | ||
| SDST - EAF | 26% Poorly correlated | -35.16% | ||
| XPON - EAF | 25% Poorly correlated | -1.01% | ||
More | ||||
RUN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RUN has been closely correlated with FCEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RUN jumps, then FCEL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RUN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RUN | 100% | -6.35% | ||
| FCEL - RUN | 67% Closely correlated | -8.62% | ||
| BE - RUN | 61% Loosely correlated | -9.15% | ||
| PLUG - RUN | 61% Loosely correlated | -7.05% | ||
| ENVX - RUN | 55% Loosely correlated | -2.79% | ||
| ENPH - RUN | 52% Loosely correlated | -8.37% | ||
More | ||||