Advertisement
EAT vs NIC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EAT is a Hold and NIC is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EAT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNIC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- EAT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- NIC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EAT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NIC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- EAT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- NIC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
EAT (@Restaurants) experienced а +3.71% price change this week, while NIC (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.54% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.00%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.68%.
Reported Earning Dates
EAT is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.
NIC is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Restaurants (-0.48% weekly)The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.
@Regional Banks (-0.14% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| EAT | NIC | EAT / NIC | |
| Capitalization | 6.94B | 2.06B | 338% |
| EBITDA | 720M | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.908 | 32.482 | 55% |
| P/E Ratio | 18.75 | 15.84 | 118% |
| Revenue | 5.38B | 367M | 1,467% |
| Total Cash | 18.9M | 105M | 18% |
| Total Debt | 1.69B | 134M | 1,264% |
EAT | NIC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 64 Fair valued | 73 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 20 | 22 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 11 | 21 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 35 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EAT's Valuation (64) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as NIC (73) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that EAT’s stock grew similarly to NIC’s over the last 12 months.
EAT's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as NIC (22) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that EAT’s stock grew similarly to NIC’s over the last 12 months.
EAT's SMR Rating (11) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as NIC (21) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that EAT’s stock grew similarly to NIC’s over the last 12 months.
NIC's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EAT (48) in the Restaurants industry. This means that NIC’s stock grew similarly to EAT’s over the last 12 months.
NIC's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EAT (62) in the Restaurants industry. This means that NIC’s stock grew similarly to EAT’s over the last 12 months.
| EAT | NIC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 53% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 80% | 5 days ago 60% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 76% | 5 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 76% | 5 days ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 83% | 5 days ago 56% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | 5 days ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 82% | 7 days ago 60% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 76% | 5 days ago 58% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 66% | 5 days ago 53% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | 6 days ago 54% |
Advertisement
EAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EAT has been loosely correlated with CAKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EAT jumps, then CAKE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EAT | 100% | +0.29% | ||
| CAKE - EAT | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.93% | ||
| SHAK - EAT | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.08% | ||
| TXRH - EAT | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| DRI - EAT | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.11% | ||
| FRSH - EAT | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.44% | ||
More | ||||
NIC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NIC has been closely correlated with STBA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NIC jumps, then STBA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NIC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NIC | 100% | -0.22% | ||
| STBA - NIC | 86% Closely correlated | -0.48% | ||
| EFSC - NIC | 86% Closely correlated | -0.67% | ||
| TCBK - NIC | 85% Closely correlated | -0.55% | ||
| FBK - NIC | 85% Closely correlated | -0.45% | ||
| MBWM - NIC | 85% Closely correlated | -0.93% | ||
More | ||||