LTM | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 83 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 99 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 19 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 12 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ECH | LTM | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago43% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago77% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago67% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago67% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago57% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago73% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago90% | 9 days ago68% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 7 days ago58% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago71% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago87% | 2 days ago57% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ECH has been loosely correlated with CCU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ECH jumps, then CCU could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that LTM and AFLYY have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LTM and AFLYY's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LTM | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LTM | 100% | +1.99% | ||
AFLYY - LTM | 20% Poorly correlated | +1.21% | ||
ULCC - LTM | 15% Poorly correlated | -1.32% | ||
VLRS - LTM | 14% Poorly correlated | -3.19% | ||
SNCY - LTM | 12% Poorly correlated | -0.09% | ||
ALGT - LTM | 12% Poorly correlated | -2.22% | ||
More |