ECO vs HAFN
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECO is a Buy and HAFN is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ECO’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileHAFN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- ECO’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- HAFN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ECO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HAFN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ECO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- HAFN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
ECO (@Marine Shipping) experienced а -5.02% price change this week, while HAFN (@Marine Shipping) price change was -4.50% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was -1.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was -17.85%.
Reported Earning Dates
ECO is expected to report earnings on May 14, 2025.
HAFN is expected to report earnings on May 15, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Marine Shipping (-1.95% weekly)The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.
| ECO | HAFN | ECO / HAFN | |
| Capitalization | 677M | 1.98B | 34% |
| EBITDA | 215M | 1.14B | 19% |
| Gain YTD | -0.411 | -27.165 | 2% |
| P/E Ratio | 6.42 | 2.69 | 239% |
| Revenue | 400M | 3.04B | 13% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 197M | - |
| Total Debt | 657M | 1.08B | 61% |
| ECO | HAFN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 52% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 32% | 2 days ago 45% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 56% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 68% | 17 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 9 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 5 days ago 50% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 44% | 2 days ago 71% |
ECO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ECO has been closely correlated with NAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ECO jumps, then NAT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ECO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ECO | 100% | -4.10% | ||
| NAT - ECO | 69% Closely correlated | -3.69% | ||
| HAFN - ECO | 66% Closely correlated | -3.59% | ||
| ASC - ECO | 65% Loosely correlated | -6.31% | ||
| SFL - ECO | 54% Loosely correlated | -6.19% | ||
| HSHP - ECO | 52% Loosely correlated | -3.42% | ||
More | ||||
HAFN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HAFN has been loosely correlated with ASC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HAFN jumps, then ASC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HAFN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HAFN | 100% | -3.59% | ||
| ASC - HAFN | 62% Loosely correlated | -6.31% | ||
| NAT - HAFN | 54% Loosely correlated | -3.69% | ||
| BWLP - HAFN | 53% Loosely correlated | -5.80% | ||
| DAC - HAFN | 45% Loosely correlated | -7.53% | ||
| SFL - HAFN | 45% Loosely correlated | -6.19% | ||
More | ||||