ECO
Price
$20.82
Change
-$0.89 (-4.10%)
Updated
Apr 3 closing price
Capitalization
676.7M
40 days until earnings call
SFL
Price
$7.73
Change
-$0.51 (-6.19%)
Updated
Apr 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.04B
34 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

ECO vs SFL

Header iconECO vs SFL Comparison
Open Charts ECO vs SFLBanner chart's image
Okeanis Eco Tankers
Price$20.82
Change-$0.89 (-4.10%)
Volume$224.69K
Capitalization676.7M
SFL
Price$7.73
Change-$0.51 (-6.19%)
Volume$15.57K
Capitalization1.04B
ECO vs SFL Comparison Chart
Loading...
ECO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ECO vs. SFL commentary
Apr 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECO is a Buy and SFL is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 04, 2025
Stock price -- (ECO: $20.82 vs. SFL: $7.73)
Brand notoriety: ECO and SFL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ECO: 109% vs. SFL: 159%
Market capitalization -- ECO: $676.7M vs. SFL: $1.04B
ECO [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $676.7M. SFL’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $1.04B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $29.14B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $4.43B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ECO’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSFL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ECO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SFL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ECO is a better buy in the long-term than SFL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ECO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ECO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • SFL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SFL is a better buy in the short-term than ECO.

Price Growth

ECO (@Marine Shipping) experienced а -5.02% price change this week, while SFL (@Marine Shipping) price change was -5.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was -4.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was -16.88%.

Reported Earning Dates

ECO is expected to report earnings on May 14, 2025.

SFL is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (-4.79% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFL($1.04B) has a higher market cap than ECO($677M). SFL has higher P/E ratio than ECO: SFL (8.16) vs ECO (6.42). ECO YTD gains are higher at: -0.411 vs. SFL (-21.889). SFL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 559M vs. ECO (215M). ECO has less debt than SFL: ECO (657M) vs SFL (2.82B). SFL has higher revenues than ECO: SFL (873M) vs ECO (400M).
ECOSFLECO / SFL
Capitalization677M1.04B65%
EBITDA215M559M38%
Gain YTD-0.411-21.8892%
P/E Ratio6.428.1679%
Revenue400M873M46%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt657M2.82B23%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SFL: Fundamental Ratings
SFL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
13
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
70
SMR RATING
1..100
59
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
80
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
96
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ECOSFL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
32%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ECO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MFRBX46.77N/A
N/A
MFS Research B
DRDAX25.92N/A
N/A
Dearborn Partners Rising Dividend A
TVOAX36.66N/A
N/A
Touchstone Small Cap Value A
STRMX15.07N/A
N/A
Sterling Capital Mid Value R6
FIQVX33.40N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Convertible Secs Z

ECO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ECO has been closely correlated with NAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ECO jumps, then NAT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ECO
1D Price
Change %
ECO100%
-4.10%
NAT - ECO
69%
Closely correlated
-3.69%
HAFN - ECO
66%
Closely correlated
-3.59%
ASC - ECO
65%
Loosely correlated
-6.31%
SFL - ECO
54%
Loosely correlated
-6.19%
HSHP - ECO
52%
Loosely correlated
-3.42%
More

SFL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFL has been loosely correlated with ASC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SFL jumps, then ASC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFL
1D Price
Change %
SFL100%
-6.19%
ASC - SFL
57%
Loosely correlated
-6.31%
ECO - SFL
54%
Loosely correlated
-4.10%
SB - SFL
50%
Loosely correlated
-6.15%
NMM - SFL
49%
Loosely correlated
-12.00%
DAC - SFL
47%
Loosely correlated
-7.53%
More