The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for EDUC turned positive on September 23, 2026. Looking at past instances where EDUC's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 37 of 42 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 88%.
The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where EDUC's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, 22 of 32 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 69%.
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 40 of 58 cases where EDUC's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 69%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 05, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on EDUC as a result. In 75 of 99 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 76%.
Following a +0.77% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where EDUC advanced for three days, in 142 of 178 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 80%.
The 50-day moving average for EDUC moved below the 200-day moving average on September 18, 2026. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.
EDUC broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 13, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for EDUC entered a downward trend on September 25, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 9 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 12 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is seriously undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.268) is normal, around the industry mean (8.315). EDUC has a moderately low P/E Ratio (5.458) as compared to the industry average of (20.593). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.070) is also within normal values, averaging (5.351). EDUC has a moderately high Dividend Yield (0.034) as compared to the industry average of (0.019). P/S Ratio (0.540) is also within normal values, averaging (1.204).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 69 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. EDUC’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 83 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. EDUC’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 80, placing this stock worse than average.
The 50-day moving average for LEE moved below the 200-day moving average on October 02, 2026. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.
The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 33 of 39 cases where LEE's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 85%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 13, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on LEE as a result. In 81 of 93 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 87%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where LEE declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 82%.
The Aroon Indicator for LEE entered a downward trend on October 14, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where LEE's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, 31 of 38 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 82%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for LEE just turned positive on October 05, 2026. Looking at past instances where LEE's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 25 of 34 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 74%.
Following a +3.26% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where LEE advanced for three days, in 172 of 226 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 76%.
LEE may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 31 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 60 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. LEE’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 71 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: LEE's P/B Ratio (25.189) is slightly higher than the industry average of (8.315). P/E Ratio (10.638) is within average values for comparable stocks, (20.593). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.150) is also within normal values, averaging (5.351). LEE has a moderately low Dividend Yield (0.000) as compared to the industry average of (0.019). P/S Ratio (0.171) is also within normal values, averaging (1.204).
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. LEE’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 80, placing this stock worse than average.
EDUC | LEE | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 46 | 13 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 12 Undervalued | 71 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 83 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 69 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 9 | 31 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EDUC's Valuation (12) in the Publishing Books Or Magazines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LEE (71) in the Publishing Newspapers industry. This means that EDUC’s stock grew somewhat faster than LEE’s over the last 12 months.
EDUC's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Publishing Books Or Magazines industry is in the same range as LEE (100) in the Publishing Newspapers industry. This means that EDUC’s stock grew similarly to LEE’s over the last 12 months.
EDUC's SMR Rating (83) in the Publishing Books Or Magazines industry is in the same range as LEE (100) in the Publishing Newspapers industry. This means that EDUC’s stock grew similarly to LEE’s over the last 12 months.
LEE's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Publishing Newspapers industry is in the same range as EDUC (69) in the Publishing Books Or Magazines industry. This means that LEE’s stock grew similarly to EDUC’s over the last 12 months.
EDUC's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Publishing Books Or Magazines industry is in the same range as LEE (31) in the Publishing Newspapers industry. This means that EDUC’s stock grew similarly to LEE’s over the last 12 months.
| EDUC | LEE | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 7 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 80% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EDUC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while LEE’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EDUC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LEE’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
EDUC (@Publishing: Newspapers) experienced а +0.77% price change this week, while LEE (@Publishing: Newspapers) price change was -8.14% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Publishing: Newspapers industry was -0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.48%.
LEE is expected to report earnings on Dec 03, 2026.
The newspaper publishing industry includes companies that publish and market news journals and daily/weekly newspapers. News Corporation, New York Times Company, and Gannett Co., Inc. are some of the largest newspaper publishers. Commercial ad revenue helps to cover plant and equipment costs and general and administrative expense. The popularity and distribution network of newspaper publishers could affect the fees they can charge on advertisements. In recent decades, with digital content grabbing advertising dollars, long-standing publishing companies have increasingly diversified into creating their own web-based content to stay in business.
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| AIBD | 44.92 | 3.29 | +7.90% |
| Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bear 2X ETF (AIBD) | |||
| CGSD | 25.34 | -0.02 | -0.08% |
| Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF (CGSD) | |||
| FDIQ | 69.98 | -0.26 | -0.37% |
| Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF (FDIQ) | |||
| GDE | 63.37 | -1.57 | -2.42% |
| WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE) | |||
| HOOW | 23.07 | -2.56 | -9.99% |
| Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW) | |||
A.I.dvisor tells us that EDUC and TDAY have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EDUC and TDAY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EDUC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDUC | 100% | +0.38% | ||
| TDAY - EDUC | 14% Poorly correlated | -0.83% | ||
| LEE - EDUC | 11% Poorly correlated | -0.88% | ||
| TNMG - EDUC | 9% Poorly correlated | -3.85% | ||
| RELX - EDUC | 7% Poorly correlated | +0.63% | ||
| SCHL - EDUC | 5% Poorly correlated | -0.82% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor tells us that LEE and RELX have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LEE and RELX's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LEE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LEE | 100% | -0.88% | ||
| RELX - LEE | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.63% | ||
| EDUC - LEE | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.38% | ||
| PSO - LEE | 8% Poorly correlated | -0.52% | ||
| TNMG - LEE | 6% Poorly correlated | -3.85% | ||
| NYT - LEE | 5% Poorly correlated | +0.40% | ||
More | ||||