Compare trend and price EEMV vs TEL
Loading...
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEMV is a Hold and TEL is a StrongSell.
TEL | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 64 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 18 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 26 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 38 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 83 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| EEMV | TEL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 55% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 54% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 53% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 52% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 11 days ago 61% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 54% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 49% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GDVD | 23.69 | 0.04 | +0.16% |
| Copper Place Global Dividend Growth ETF | |||
| SDOG | 52.07 | 0.08 | +0.15% |
| ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF | |||
| CN | 23.67 | N/A | N/A |
| Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF | |||
| AUSF | 38.91 | -0.07 | -0.18% |
| Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF | |||
| BATT | 9.17 | -0.03 | -0.33% |
| Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF | |||
EEMV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EEMV has been loosely correlated with TEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EEMV jumps, then TEL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EEMV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EEMV | 100% | +0.02% | ||
| TEL - EEMV | 49% Loosely correlated | -1.43% | ||
| ZTO - EEMV | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.38% | ||
| YUMC - EEMV | 45% Loosely correlated | -1.62% | ||
| BAP - EEMV | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.50% | ||
| BGNE - EEMV | 40% Loosely correlated | +1.68% | ||
More | ||||
TEL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TEL has been closely correlated with APH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TEL jumps, then APH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TEL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEL | 100% | -1.43% | ||
| APH - TEL | 78% Closely correlated | -1.25% | ||
| LFUS - TEL | 57% Loosely correlated | +1.21% | ||
| TTMI - TEL | 52% Loosely correlated | -1.07% | ||
| PLXS - TEL | 52% Loosely correlated | +1.23% | ||
| BHE - TEL | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.26% | ||
More | ||||