Advertisement
ELPC vs PAM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ELPC is a StrongBuy and PAM is a Buy.
| ELPC | PAM | ELPC / PAM | |
| Capitalization | 9.39B | 5.01B | 187% |
| EBITDA | 5.54B | 860M | 644% |
| Gain YTD | 46.892 | -2.237 | -2,096% |
| P/E Ratio | 14.93 | 7.87 | 190% |
| Revenue | 28B | 2.42B | 1,158% |
| Total Cash | 3.42B | 1.28B | 267% |
| Total Debt | 23.6B | 2.6B | 908% |
PAM | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 32 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 39 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 25 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 56 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| ELPC | PAM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 66% | 5 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 60% | 30 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 71% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ELPC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while PAM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- ELPC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PAM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ELPC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ELPC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- PAM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
ELPC (@Electric Utilities) experienced а +1.79% price change this week, while PAM (@Industrial Conglomerates) price change was +2.04% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was -1.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.55%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Conglomerates industry was -3.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.68%.
Reported Earning Dates
ELPC is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2026.
PAM is expected to report earnings on Nov 02, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electric Utilities (-1.23% weekly)Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.
@Industrial Conglomerates (-3.79% weekly)Industrial Conglomerates specialize in numerous types of products, most of which comprise industrial goods, while some also go towards meeting household needs. Honeywell (makes engineering services and aerospace systems), United Technologies Corporation(manufactures aircraft engines, aerospace systems, HVAC, elevators and escalators, fire and security, building systems, and industrial products, among others), 3M (over 60,000 products under several world-renowned brands, including adhesives, abrasives, laminates, passive fire protection, personal protective equipment, window films, paint protection films, dental and orthodontic products, electrical & electronic connecting and insulating materials, medical products, car-care products, electronic circuits, healthcare software and optical films).
Advertisement
ELPC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ELPC has been loosely correlated with CIG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ELPC jumps, then CIG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ELPC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ELPC | 100% | -1.81% | ||
| CIG - ELPC | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.45% | ||
| EDN - ELPC | 26% Poorly correlated | -2.35% | ||
| FTS - ELPC | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.20% | ||
| CEPU - ELPC | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.42% | ||
| PAM - ELPC | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.17% | ||
More | ||||
PAM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAM has been closely correlated with CEPU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAM jumps, then CEPU could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAM | 100% | -2.17% | ||
| CEPU - PAM | 83% Closely correlated | -2.42% | ||
| CRESY - PAM | 76% Closely correlated | -3.73% | ||
| EDN - PAM | 74% Closely correlated | -2.35% | ||
| HE - PAM | 33% Loosely correlated | -0.86% | ||
| TXNM - PAM | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.33% | ||
More | ||||