It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FLUX’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ENPH’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FLUX’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
FLUX (@Electrical Products) experienced а -0.58% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electrical Products industry was -0.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.13%.
FLUX is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.
The industry produces a diverse range of electricity-powered equipment, appliances and components, catering to both households and industries. The products include power, distribution and specialty transformers; electric motors, generators and motor-generator sets; switchgear and switchboard apparatus; light bulbs, tubes, fittings and electric signs etc. Consumer income, construction spending, and industrial production are major drivers of demand for this industry’s products. Large companies tend to have economies of scale in production, marketing, and distribution, while smaller companies can potentially carve out their own market through niche or specialty offerings. The US electrical products manufacturing industry includes about 5,700 establishments (single-location companies and units of multi-location companies) with combined annual revenue of about $125 billion. (according to a study published in First Research). Emerson Electric Co., Hubbell Incorporated and Eaton Corporation plc are major electrical products makers in the U.S.
ENPH | FLUX | ENPH / FLUX | |
Capitalization | 16.4B | 71.9M | 22,809% |
EBITDA | 597M | -3.32M | -17,993% |
Gain YTD | -45.929 | -58.394 | 79% |
P/E Ratio | 38.38 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 2.29B | 64.5M | 3,552% |
Total Cash | 1.7B | 1.58M | 107,008% |
Total Debt | 1.3B | 16.3M | 7,969% |
ENPH | FLUX | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 96 Overvalued | 69 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 78 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 80 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 93 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 4 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FLUX's Valuation (69) in the null industry is in the same range as ENPH (96) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that FLUX’s stock grew similarly to ENPH’s over the last 12 months.
ENPH's Profit vs Risk Rating (78) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as FLUX (100) in the null industry. This means that ENPH’s stock grew similarly to FLUX’s over the last 12 months.
ENPH's SMR Rating (80) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as FLUX (98) in the null industry. This means that ENPH’s stock grew similarly to FLUX’s over the last 12 months.
ENPH's Price Growth Rating (64) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as FLUX (93) in the null industry. This means that ENPH’s stock grew similarly to FLUX’s over the last 12 months.
ENPH's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Semiconductors industry is significantly better than the same rating for FLUX (100) in the null industry. This means that ENPH’s stock grew significantly faster than FLUX’s over the last 12 months.
ENPH | FLUX | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago83% | 4 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago84% | 4 days ago86% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago79% | 4 days ago88% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | 4 days ago82% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago85% | 4 days ago88% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago84% | 4 days ago87% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago86% | 4 days ago79% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago87% | 6 days ago88% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago74% | 4 days ago83% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago85% | 4 days ago88% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ENPH has been closely correlated with SEDG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ENPH jumps, then SEDG could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ENPH | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ENPH | 100% | +8.59% | ||
SEDG - ENPH | 78% Closely correlated | +12.66% | ||
RUN - ENPH | 71% Closely correlated | +8.11% | ||
FSLR - ENPH | 63% Loosely correlated | +3.70% | ||
NOVA - ENPH | 62% Loosely correlated | +9.79% | ||
CSIQ - ENPH | 59% Loosely correlated | +6.88% | ||
More |