It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EPAM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EPAM’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
EPAM (@Information Technology Services) experienced а +7.06% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was -0.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.11%.
EPAM is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.
EPAM | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 30 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 53 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 67 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 88 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| EPAM | FCFY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 50% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 60% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 79% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 4 days ago 39% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EYLD | 47.96 | 0.61 | +1.29% |
| Cambria Emerging Shareholder Yield ETF | |||
| PRFD | 50.63 | 0.20 | +0.41% |
| PIMCO Preferred and Cp Sec Act Exc-Trd | |||
| FSCS | 38.09 | 0.08 | +0.21% |
| First Trust SMID Capital Strength ETF | |||
| WCEO | 39.49 | 0.06 | +0.16% |
| Hypatia Women CEO ETF | |||
| VOT | 305.67 | -0.77 | -0.25% |
| Vanguard MStar Mid Cap Growth ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EPAM has been closely correlated with GLOB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EPAM jumps, then GLOB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EPAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPAM | 100% | +7.10% | ||
| GLOB - EPAM | 74% Closely correlated | +5.92% | ||
| ACN - EPAM | 73% Closely correlated | +5.92% | ||
| CTSH - EPAM | 68% Closely correlated | +5.45% | ||
| G - EPAM | 60% Loosely correlated | +5.05% | ||
| FLYW - EPAM | 59% Loosely correlated | +3.18% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCFY has been loosely correlated with HPQ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FCFY jumps, then HPQ could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCFY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCFY | 100% | N/A | ||
| HPQ - FCFY | 36% Loosely correlated | -0.07% | ||
| PAYX - FCFY | 36% Loosely correlated | +2.14% | ||
| CTSH - FCFY | 28% Poorly correlated | +5.45% | ||
| GEN - FCFY | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.36% | ||
| EPAM - FCFY | 26% Poorly correlated | +7.10% | ||
More | ||||