Advertisement
EPAM vs G
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EPAM is a Hold and G is a Hold.
EPAM | G | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 60 | 52 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 54 Fair valued | 11 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 66 | 43 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 79 | 77 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
G's Valuation (11) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EPAM (54) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that G’s stock grew somewhat faster than EPAM’s over the last 12 months.
G's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as EPAM (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that G’s stock grew similarly to EPAM’s over the last 12 months.
G's SMR Rating (43) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as EPAM (66) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that G’s stock grew similarly to EPAM’s over the last 12 months.
EPAM's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as G (55) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that EPAM’s stock grew similarly to G’s over the last 12 months.
G's P/E Growth Rating (77) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as EPAM (79) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that G’s stock grew similarly to EPAM’s over the last 12 months.
| EPAM | G | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 52% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 66% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 46% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 48% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 57% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 65% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EPAM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while G’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- EPAM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- G’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EPAM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while G’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- EPAM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
- G’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
EPAM (@Information Technology Services) experienced а +0.06% price change this week, while G (@Information Technology Services) price change was +0.57% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was -2.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.92%.
Reported Earning Dates
EPAM is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
G is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Information Technology Services (-2.34% weekly)The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PVEX | 31.00 | 0.54 | +1.77% |
| TrueShares ConVex Protect ETF (PVEX) | |||
| DFEM | 40.31 | 0.58 | +1.46% |
| Dimensional Emerging Markets Core Equity 2 ETF (DFEM) | |||
| MSSM | 57.66 | 0.50 | +0.88% |
| Morgan Stanley Pathway Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF (MSSM) | |||
| IDVZ | 32.81 | 0.25 | +0.77% |
| Opal International Dividend Income ETF (IDVZ) | |||
| NETG | 24.09 | -0.47 | -1.90% |
| Leverage Shares 2X Long NET Daily ETF (NETG) | |||
EPAM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EPAM has been closely correlated with GLOB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EPAM jumps, then GLOB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EPAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPAM | 100% | -5.30% | ||
| GLOB - EPAM | 76% Closely correlated | -5.08% | ||
| ACN - EPAM | 73% Closely correlated | -6.31% | ||
| CTSH - EPAM | 70% Closely correlated | -3.89% | ||
| INFY - EPAM | 63% Loosely correlated | -2.73% | ||
| G - EPAM | 60% Loosely correlated | -4.06% | ||
More | ||||
G and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, G has been closely correlated with EXLS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if G jumps, then EXLS could also see price increases.