It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EPAM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EPAM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
EPAM (@Information Technology Services) experienced а -2.71% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was -0.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.84%.
EPAM is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.
EPAM | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 33 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 54 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 69 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 91 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 37 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| EPAM | LCLG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 66% | 17 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 86% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| IAF | 12.41 | 0.16 | +1.31% |
| abrdn Australia Equity Fund | |||
| GSLC | 141.10 | 0.70 | +0.50% |
| Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta® US LgCp Eq ETF | |||
| KSA | 39.38 | 0.09 | +0.23% |
| iShares MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF | |||
| IVRS | 31.05 | N/A | N/A |
| iShares Future Metaverse Tec And Com ETF | |||
| ADBG | 3.00 | -0.46 | -13.29% |
| Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EPAM has been closely correlated with GLOB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EPAM jumps, then GLOB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EPAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPAM | 100% | +2.82% | ||
| GLOB - EPAM | 73% Closely correlated | +2.94% | ||
| ACN - EPAM | 70% Closely correlated | +1.65% | ||
| CTSH - EPAM | 68% Closely correlated | +1.93% | ||
| G - EPAM | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| FLYW - EPAM | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.47% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LCLG has been loosely correlated with CDW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LCLG jumps, then CDW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LCLG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LCLG | 100% | N/A | ||
| CDW - LCLG | 52% Loosely correlated | +2.37% | ||
| CTSH - LCLG | 47% Loosely correlated | +1.93% | ||
| EPAM - LCLG | 45% Loosely correlated | +2.82% | ||
| NKE - LCLG | 41% Loosely correlated | -2.24% | ||
| STZ - LCLG | 34% Loosely correlated | +3.77% | ||
More | ||||