EPIN saw its Momentum Indicator move below the 0 level on October 19, 2026. This is an indication that the stock could be shifting in to a new downward move. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 11 similar instances where the indicator turned negative. In 8 of the 11 cases, the stock moved further down in the following days. The odds of a decline are at 73%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for EPIN turned negative on October 01, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 7 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 5 of the 7 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 71%.
EPIN moved below its 50-day moving average on October 01, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
The 10-day moving average for EPIN crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on September 23, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 1 of 3 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 33%.
The Aroon Indicator for EPIN entered a downward trend on October 15, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The RSI Indicator entered the oversold zone -- be on the watch for EPIN's price rising or consolidating in the future. That's also the time to consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Stochastic Oscillator is in the oversold zone. Keep an eye out for a move up in the foreseeable future.
Following a +2.20% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where EPIN advanced for three days, in 5 of 9 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 56%.
EPIN may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
SQM may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options. In 29 of 35 cases where SQM's price broke its lower Bollinger Band, its price rose further in the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 83%.
The RSI Indicator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 3 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an Uptrend is expected.
The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 5 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.
Following a +2.56% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where SQM advanced for three days, in 223 of 302 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 74%.
The 10-day moving average for SQM crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on September 18, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 13 of 17 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 76%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where SQM declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 78%.
The Aroon Indicator for SQM entered a downward trend on October 19, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 41 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 45 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (2.721) is normal, around the industry mean (2.342). P/E Ratio (12.375) is within average values for comparable stocks, (-17.016). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.300) is also within normal values, averaging (1.548). Dividend Yield (0.072) settles around the average of (0.039) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (2.917) is also within normal values, averaging (48.960).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 50 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. SQM’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 82 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. SQM’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 82, placing this stock worse than average.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 85 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 90 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
SQM | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 56 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 45 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 82 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 41 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 90 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| EPIN | SQM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 39% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 56% | 15 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 6% | 2 days ago 76% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CAML | 40.07 | 0.25 | +0.62% |
| Congress Large Cap Growth ETF (CAML) | |||
| KSLV | 22.26 | 0.01 | +0.04% |
| Kurv Silver Enhanced Income ETF (KSLV) | |||
| VRIG | 24.99 | -0.09 | -0.34% |
| Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF (VRIG) | |||
| EMET | 38.69 | -0.23 | -0.58% |
| VanEck Copper and Electrification Metals ETF (EMET) | |||
| NVOH | 21.67 | -0.13 | -0.61% |
| NOVO NORDISK A/S (B SHARES) ADRHEDGED | |||
A.I.dvisor tells us that EPIN and SQM have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EPIN and SQM's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EPIN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPIN | 100% | -1.25% | ||
| SQM - EPIN | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.12% | ||
| RIO - EPIN | 19% Poorly correlated | -0.91% | ||
| BIDU - EPIN | 16% Poorly correlated | -0.45% | ||
| IBN - EPIN | 12% Poorly correlated | -1.70% | ||
| HDB - EPIN | 11% Poorly correlated | -3.19% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SQM has been closely correlated with ALB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SQM jumps, then ALB could also see price increases.