Advertisement
ESP vs PLPC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESP is a Hold and PLPC is a Hold.
ESP | PLPC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 86 | 26 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 17 Undervalued | 73 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 8 | 12 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 46 | 75 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 16 | 6 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ESP's Valuation (17) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PLPC (73) in the Building Products industry. This means that ESP’s stock grew somewhat faster than PLPC’s over the last 12 months.
ESP's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as PLPC (12) in the Building Products industry. This means that ESP’s stock grew similarly to PLPC’s over the last 12 months.
ESP's SMR Rating (46) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as PLPC (75) in the Building Products industry. This means that ESP’s stock grew similarly to PLPC’s over the last 12 months.
PLPC's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as ESP (43) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that PLPC’s stock grew similarly to ESP’s over the last 12 months.
PLPC's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as ESP (16) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that PLPC’s stock grew similarly to ESP’s over the last 12 months.
| ESP | PLPC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 63% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 76% | 9 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 65% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 79% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ESP’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green while PLPC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- ESP’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- PLPC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ESP’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PLPC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ESP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- PLPC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
ESP (@Electrical Products) experienced а -1.57% price change this week, while PLPC (@Electrical Products) price change was -5.25% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electrical Products industry was -1.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.90%.
Reported Earning Dates
ESP is expected to report earnings on Nov 16, 2026.
PLPC is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electrical Products (-1.27% weekly)The industry produces a diverse range of electricity-powered equipment, appliances and components, catering to both households and industries. The products include power, distribution and specialty transformers; electric motors, generators and motor-generator sets; switchgear and switchboard apparatus; light bulbs, tubes, fittings and electric signs etc. Consumer income, construction spending, and industrial production are major drivers of demand for this industry’s products. Large companies tend to have economies of scale in production, marketing, and distribution, while smaller companies can potentially carve out their own market through niche or specialty offerings. The US electrical products manufacturing industry includes about 5,700 establishments (single-location companies and units of multi-location companies) with combined annual revenue of about $125 billion. (according to a study published in First Research). Emerson Electric Co., Hubbell Incorporated and Eaton Corporation plc are major electrical products makers in the U.S.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BSOL | 16.30 | 0.15 | +0.93% |
| Bitwise Solana Staking ETF (BSOL) | |||
| FTBI | 21.11 | 0.09 | +0.42% |
| First Trust Balanced Income ETF | |||
| FMN | 9.88 | 0.03 | +0.30% |
| Federated Hermes Premier Municipal Income Fund | |||
| TTOP | 19.93 | N/A | N/A |
| 21Shares FTSE Crypto 10 Index ETF (TTOP) | |||
| NCZ | 13.89 | -0.21 | -1.49% |
| Virtus Convertible & Income Fund II | |||
ESP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ESP and PLPC have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ESP and PLPC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ESP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESP | 100% | +1.30% | ||
| PLPC - ESP | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.01% | ||
| NVT - ESP | 26% Poorly correlated | +3.37% | ||
| AYI - ESP | 25% Poorly correlated | -3.40% | ||
| CBAT - ESP | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.75% | ||
| TGEN - ESP | 25% Poorly correlated | -6.69% | ||
More | ||||
PLPC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLPC has been loosely correlated with NVT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PLPC jumps, then NVT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PLPC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLPC | 100% | +0.01% | ||
| NVT - PLPC | 52% Loosely correlated | +3.37% | ||
| POWL - PLPC | 52% Loosely correlated | +3.35% | ||
| HUBB - PLPC | 51% Loosely correlated | +2.95% | ||
| AEIS - PLPC | 51% Loosely correlated | +4.36% | ||
| LTBR - PLPC | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.16% | ||
More | ||||