| EWG | FGM | EWG / FGM | |
| Gain YTD | 6.085 | 3.241 | 188% |
| Net Assets | 1.72B | 98.6M | 1,747% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.80 | 61% |
| Turnover | 2.00 | 66.00 | 3% |
| Yield | 1.94 | 1.40 | 139% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 15 years | - |
| EWG | FGM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 83% | 10 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 83% | 6 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 85% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWG has been loosely correlated with NEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EWG jumps, then NEM could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that FGM and ENR have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FGM and ENR's prices will move in lockstep.