| EWG | FGM | EWG / FGM | |
| Gain YTD | 2.845 | 2.773 | 103% |
| Net Assets | 1.65B | 97.8M | 1,683% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.80 | 61% |
| Turnover | 2.00 | 66.00 | 3% |
| Yield | 1.94 | 1.40 | 139% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 14 years | - |
| EWG | FGM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | 7 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 83% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 66% | 4 days ago 83% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWG has been loosely correlated with NEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EWG jumps, then NEM could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that FGM and CBK have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FGM and CBK's prices will move in lockstep.