Q | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 29 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 4 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 62 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| EWW | Q | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 84% | 19 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | N/A |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWW has been loosely correlated with OMAB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EWW jumps, then OMAB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EWW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EWW | 100% | -1.77% | ||
| OMAB - EWW | 58% Loosely correlated | -3.74% | ||
| Q - EWW | 31% Poorly correlated | +3.94% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, Q has been loosely correlated with ONTO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if Q jumps, then ONTO could also see price increases.