AMAT
Price
$507.18
Change
-$27.36 (-5.12%)
Updated
Aug 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
424.4B
90 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Q
Price
$142.32
Change
-$0.27 (-0.19%)
Updated
Aug 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
29.83B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMAT vs Q

AMAT vs Q Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 03, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Applied Materials (AMAT) vs. Qorvo (Q) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • AMAT has delivered significantly stronger year-to-date returns in 2026 compared to Q, driven by robust demand in the semiconductor equipment sector.
  • Recent earnings for AMAT showed record quarterly revenue, while Q reported improved margins and an earnings beat in its latest quarter amid a pending corporate transaction.
  • AMAT benefits from broad exposure to artificial intelligence-related capital spending, whereas Q focuses on connectivity and power solutions with more mixed recent momentum.
  • Market sentiment around AMAT has included multiple analyst target increases, contrasting with Q’s more modest performance relative to broader market indices.
  • Both companies operate in technology hardware but differ in cyclical exposure, with AMAT showing greater volatility tied to equipment spending cycles.
  • Upcoming earnings releases and sector trends in semiconductors remain key near-term catalysts for relative performance.

Introduction

This comparison examines AMAT (Applied Materials) and Q (Qorvo) to highlight differences in business models, recent stock behavior, and market positioning within the technology sector. Both companies serve critical roles in electronics supply chains but target distinct segments: semiconductor manufacturing equipment for one and radio-frequency connectivity solutions for the other. The analysis focuses on observable trends from recent market activity to assist institutional and individual investors evaluating relative opportunities in a dynamic environment influenced by artificial intelligence adoption and supply-chain shifts.

AMAT Overview and Recent Performance

Applied Materials designs and manufactures equipment used in the production of semiconductors, displays, and related technologies. In recent weeks, the stock has exhibited strong overall gains in 2026, supported by sustained demand for advanced chipmaking tools amid artificial intelligence infrastructure buildouts. Record fiscal second-quarter revenue of $7.91 billion reflected an 11% year-over-year increase, with gross margins near 50%. Price action has included periods of volatility following all-time highs, yet the shares have maintained elevated levels relative to earlier in the year. Analyst commentary has emphasized long-term visibility into AI-driven capital expenditures, contributing to upward revisions in price targets during the period.

Q Overview and Recent Performance

Qorvo develops connectivity and power solutions primarily for wireless communications, defense, and infrastructure applications. The company recently reported fiscal 2027 first-quarter results showing revenue of $784.8 million and a non-GAAP earnings per share of $1.64, exceeding consensus estimates. Gross margins expanded notably year over year. Stock performance has been more measured, with year-to-date returns trailing broader market benchmarks. A pending transaction with Skyworks has led the company to suspend forward guidance and earnings calls, contributing to a more cautious trading environment amid sector rotation in technology names.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of AI trading bots optimized for prevailing market conditions. Tickeron maintains hundreds of AI Trading Bots that trade thousands of different tickers across equities, with each bot employing unique strategies, timeframes, and performance profiles. Only those demonstrating the strongest suitability based on current data trends earn placement in the trending section. Available bots report varied statistics, including annualized returns often ranging from 50% to over 140% in backtested or forward-tested scenarios, alongside metrics such as Sharpe ratios and profit factors. These tools accommodate diverse trading styles and ticker sets. Review the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page for detailed performance data.

Head-to-Head Comparison

AMAT operates in the semiconductor capital equipment space with high exposure to cyclical wafer fabrication spending, while Q supplies components for mobile and wireless devices, resulting in comparatively steadier but lower-growth demand patterns. Recent momentum favors AMAT due to artificial intelligence tailwinds and stronger revenue growth, whereas Q has shown margin improvement amid cost discipline. Risk factors for AMAT include potential slowdowns in equipment orders, while Q faces integration uncertainties from its pending transaction. Sector sentiment remains constructive for semiconductor equipment names, with AMAT benefiting from broader analyst optimism compared to the more muted positioning of connectivity-focused peers.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as trend consistency in revenue growth, stability of recent earnings beats, and positioning within high-visibility artificial intelligence supply chains, Tickeron’s AI models currently assign a higher probability of favorable relative performance to AMAT over the near term. Q demonstrates solid operational metrics but contends with transaction-related uncertainty that may limit momentum. This assessment reflects probabilistic weighting of historical patterns and current catalysts rather than absolute forecasts.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
AMAT vs. Q commentary
Aug 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMAT is a Hold and Q is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 15, 2026
Stock price -- (AMAT: $534.54 vs. Q: $142.59)
Brand notoriety: AMAT: Notable vs. Q: Not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Production Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMAT: 81% vs. Q: 78%
Market capitalization -- AMAT: $424.4B vs. Q: $29.83B
AMAT [@Electronic Production Equipment] is valued at $424.4B. Q’s [@Electronic Production Equipment] market capitalization is $29.83B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry ranges from $694.76B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry is $68.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMAT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileQ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AMAT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • Q’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AMAT is a better buy in the long-term than Q.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMAT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while Q’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMAT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • Q’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, Q is a better buy in the short-term than AMAT.

Price Growth

AMAT (@Electronic Production Equipment) experienced а +1.34% price change this week, while Q (@Electronic Production Equipment) price change was +6.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was +2.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +46.47%.

Reported Earning Dates

AMAT is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Production Equipment (+2.20% weekly)

The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AMAT($424B) has a higher market cap than Q($29.8B). Q (50.94) and AMAT (50.29) have similar P/E ratio . AMAT YTD gains are higher at: 108.519 vs. Q (74.836).
AMATQAMAT / Q
Capitalization424B29.8B1,423%
EBITDA11.1BN/A-
Gain YTD108.51974.836145%
P/E Ratio50.2950.9499%
Revenue29BN/A-
Total Cash8.24BN/A-
Total Debt7.27BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMAT vs Q: Fundamental Ratings
AMAT
Q
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6121
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
36100
SMR RATING
1..100
25100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3753
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
841
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

Q's Valuation (64) in the Servicestothe Health Industry industry is in the same range as AMAT (68) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that Q’s stock grew similarly to AMAT’s over the last 12 months.

AMAT's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for Q (100) in the Servicestothe Health Industry industry. This means that AMAT’s stock grew somewhat faster than Q’s over the last 12 months.

AMAT's SMR Rating (25) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is significantly better than the same rating for Q (100) in the Servicestothe Health Industry industry. This means that AMAT’s stock grew significantly faster than Q’s over the last 12 months.

AMAT's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as Q (53) in the Servicestothe Health Industry industry. This means that AMAT’s stock grew similarly to Q’s over the last 12 months.

AMAT's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for Q (41) in the Servicestothe Health Industry industry. This means that AMAT’s stock grew somewhat faster than Q’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMATQ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMAT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Q
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ATHAX17.840.09
+0.51%
American Century Heritage A
BEGIX19.11N/A
N/A
Sterling Capital Equity Income Instl
PUMYX15.04N/A
N/A
PACE Small/Medium Co Growth Equity Y
LVAVX17.24N/A
N/A
LSV Conservative Value Equity Investor
VESGX56.48N/A
N/A
Vanguard Global ESG Select Stk Admiral

Q and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, Q has been loosely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if Q jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To Q
1D Price
Change %
Q100%
+0.36%
LRCX - Q
53%
Loosely correlated
+3.34%
ONTO - Q
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.14%
AMAT - Q
52%
Loosely correlated
-2.48%
KLAC - Q
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.54%
NVMI - Q
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.38%
More