What are Adjusted Earnings?

In the world of finance and investment, one common term you might come across is 'Adjusted Earnings.' This non-GAAP accounting method is frequently met with skepticism, as it can sometimes be used to mislead investors. This article aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of Adjusted Earnings, their advantages and disadvantages, and why you should exercise caution when using them to evaluate a company's performance.

Understanding Adjusted Earnings

Adjusted Earnings, also known as pro forma or non-GAAP earnings, are financial figures derived from a company's income statement that exclude certain items. They are meant to provide a clearer view of a company's ongoing operations and financial performance, by eliminating the impact of non-recurring or one-time events, such as acquisitions, divestitures, restructuring costs, or legal settlements.

To fully comprehend Adjusted Earnings, it's essential to be familiar with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). GAAP is a set of rules and standards that publicly-traded companies must follow when preparing their financial statements. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) regulates these principles in the United States to ensure consistency and transparency in financial reporting.

GAAP vs. Adjusted Earnings: When to Use Which?

There are instances when using Adjusted Earnings can be more appropriate than GAAP earnings for analyzing a company's financial performance. Adjusted Earnings can help investors and analysts to focus on the company's core operations and growth potential, without being distracted by large one-time expenses or extraordinary events that might skew the results.

For example, imagine a company that recently underwent a significant restructuring process involving a one-time expense. Comparing its current financial performance to that of previous years using GAAP earnings may not provide a clear picture of its ongoing operations. In this case, using Adjusted Earnings, which exclude the one-time restructuring cost, may offer a more accurate comparison.

Potential Misuse of Adjusted Earnings

While Adjusted Earnings can provide valuable insights into a company's financial health, they can also be manipulated to present a more favorable picture. Companies may declare a wide array of items as non-recurring or excludable expenses, which can lead to an inflated sense of financial performance. The SEC has rules in place to prevent companies from misleading investors with non-GAAP accounting methods; however, these rules can sometimes be open to interpretation, leaving room for potential abuse.

Some common pitfalls associated with Adjusted Earnings include:

  1. Inconsistency: Companies may not consistently classify expenses as non-recurring or one-time, leading to discrepancies in financial reporting and making it difficult for investors to compare results across different periods.

  2. Subjectivity: The decision to exclude certain expenses can be subjective, allowing management to pick and choose which items to remove, potentially leading to a biased view of the company's financial performance.

  3. Overemphasis on positive results: Companies may be tempted to emphasize Adjusted Earnings when they present a more favorable picture than GAAP earnings, while downplaying or ignoring the latter.

  4. Potential for manipulation: Companies may use Adjusted Earnings to mask underlying issues or financial weaknesses, creating an illusion of better performance.

Exercising Caution with Adjusted Earnings

Given the potential pitfalls associated with Adjusted Earnings, it is crucial for investors and analysts to exercise caution when using them to evaluate a company's financial performance. Here are some tips to keep in mind:

  1. Compare GAAP and Adjusted Earnings: Always examine both GAAP and Adjusted Earnings, and look for significant discrepancies between the two figures. This can provide insights into the nature of the adjustments made and help identify potential areas of concern.

  2. Investigate the excluded items: Take the time to analyze the excluded items in Adjusted Earnings. Understand the reasons behind their exclusion and evaluate whether they are truly non-recurring or one-time events. This can help determine the validity of the adjustments and prevent being misled by manipulated figures.

  3. Consider historical trends: Examine the company's historical use of Adjusted Earnings, and compare them to GAAP earnings over time. Look for patterns or inconsistencies in their application, which could indicate potential manipulation or misrepresentation of financial performance.

  4. Compare with industry peers: Evaluate a company's Adjusted Earnings in comparison to its industry peers. This can provide valuable context and help assess the company's relative performance and the legitimacy of its adjustments.

  5. Look for transparency: Companies that provide clear and transparent explanations for the adjustments made to their financial statements are less likely to engage in manipulation. Be wary of companies that do not adequately explain or justify their use of Adjusted Earnings.

Adjusted Earnings can be a valuable tool for investors and analysts when used correctly. They can help provide a clearer view of a company's ongoing operations and financial performance by eliminating the impact of non-recurring or one-time events. However, due to their potential for misuse and manipulation, it is essential to approach Adjusted Earnings with caution and skepticism.

By comparing GAAP and Adjusted Earnings, investigating excluded items, considering historical trends, and comparing a company's performance with its industry peers, investors can make more informed decisions and mitigate the risks associated with relying solely on Adjusted Earnings. Ultimately, a balanced approach that considers both GAAP and non-GAAP financial metrics will provide the most comprehensive understanding of a company's true financial health.

What is Income Property?
What is Investment Income?