In the self-storage real estate investment trust (REIT) arena, two names dominate the landscape: Extra Space Storage and Public Storage. Together, these S&P 500 constituents control tens of thousands of properties across the United States, offering investors exposure to one of commercial real estate's most resilient subsectors. As the industry navigates moderating demand, elevated operating expenses, and a gradually declining new-supply pipeline, the relative positioning of EXR and PSA has become a focal point for REIT-focused portfolios. This comparison examines how these two self-storage giants stack up across key dimensions — from recent financial performance and balance sheet quality to strategic initiatives and market sentiment — providing a data-driven framework for investors evaluating the sector.
Extra Space Storage, headquartered in Salt Lake City, Utah, is the second-largest self-storage operator in the United States. Beyond its wholly owned portfolio, EXR has built the industry's largest third-party management platform, overseeing more than 2,260 managed stores as of year-end 2025, alongside a growing bridge loan origination business that adds a capital-light revenue stream. The company completed its transformative merger with Life Storage in 2023, significantly expanding its footprint.
In recent market activity, EXR has demonstrated improving operational momentum. For full-year 2025, the company reported Core FFO (Funds From Operations, a key REIT profitability metric that adjusts net income for depreciation and gains/losses on property sales) of $8.21 per share, a 1.1% increase year-over-year. The fourth quarter showed particular promise, with same-store revenue turning positive at 0.4% growth and same-store NOI (Net Operating Income) inching up 0.1%. Occupancy ended the year at 92.6%, and CEO Joe Margolis noted that new customer rates are strengthening while new supply continues to moderate. Wall Street has taken notice: Wells Fargo upgraded EXR to Overweight in recent months, naming it the firm's top pick in the self-storage group, citing industry-leading occupancy and superior pricing power on move-in rates. The company guided 2026 Core FFO to a range of $8.05 to $8.35 per share.
Public Storage, based in Glendale, California, is the largest owner and operator of self-storage facilities in the United States, with a portfolio spanning approximately 3,400 locations across 40 states and a 35% equity stake in Shurgard Self Storage, which operates across Western Europe. PSA's brand recognition is unparalleled in the sector, and its scale provides significant competitive advantages in pricing, marketing, and operating efficiency.
Recent quarters have reflected a mixed but stabilizing picture. For full-year 2025, PSA delivered Core FFO of $16.97 per share, up 1.8% from the prior year, though GAAP net income declined 15.3% due largely to foreign currency translation effects on Euro-denominated debt. Same-store revenues were flat for the full year, and same-store NOI declined 0.5%, as modestly higher realized rents per occupied square foot were offset by slightly lower average occupancy of 92.0%. However, the fourth quarter brought an encouraging signal: occupancy improved year-over-year for the first time in over four years. PSA also announced PS4.0, a comprehensive strategic initiative involving a generational leadership transition — Tom Boyle will succeed Joe Russell as CEO in April 2026 — designed to accelerate long-term shareholder returns through enhanced customer experience and margin expansion. The company's 2026 guidance projects Core FFO between $16.35 and $17.00 per share.
For traders and investors seeking a technology-driven edge in evaluating stocks like EXR and PSA, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers across various timeframes and market conditions, but only a select group earns placement in the Trending AI Robots section — those whose strategies, performance metrics, and risk profiles align most closely with the current market environment. These bots span diverse trading styles, from short-term swing trading to longer-duration trend-following, with some achieving win rates above 70% and others generating compelling risk-adjusted returns through disciplined entry and exit signals. Each bot comes with transparent historical statistics, including trade frequency, average return per trade, and maximum drawdown, allowing users to match strategies to their own objectives. Explore the Trending AI Robots page to discover which automated strategies are currently navigating the self-storage REIT sector and beyond.
While EXR and PSA both operate in the self-storage REIT space, their business models diverge in meaningful ways. Extra Space Storage has cultivated a more diversified revenue ecosystem, with its third-party management platform and bridge loan origination business contributing fee-based income that partially insulates the company from same-store operating volatility. Public Storage, by contrast, operates a more pure-play ownership model, generating the vast majority of its revenue from directly owned properties — a structure that delivers industry-leading NOI margins of approximately 78% but offers less revenue diversification.
On financial strength, PSA holds a clear advantage. Its A2/A credit ratings, $2.4 billion in liquidity, and a weighted average debt maturity of 6.3 years at just 3.2% provide substantial cushion against higher-for-longer interest rate scenarios. EXR carries a higher debt-to-equity ratio and a slightly higher blended interest rate of approximately 4.3%, though 82% of its debt is fixed-rate, mitigating near-term refinancing risk.
From a growth catalyst standpoint, EXR appears to have near-term momentum. The company's ability to raise move-in rates while peers have been cutting them, combined with the ongoing synergy extraction from the Life Storage merger, positions it for potentially industry-leading same-store revenue growth in 2026. PSA's catalysts are more structural: the PS4.0 transformation, the expiration of Los Angeles rent restrictions in early 2026, and a substantial development pipeline of 3.5 million net rentable square feet.
Market sentiment reflects these nuances. PSA's larger size and fortress balance sheet have attracted a more defensive investor base, while EXR's relative valuation discount — trading roughly flat to PSA on some metrics after historically commanding a premium — has drawn value-oriented interest, including the Wells Fargo upgrade. Both stocks have experienced double-digit declines from their 52-week highs, reflecting broader REIT sector pressure from elevated interest rates.
Based on observable trend consistency, relative momentum, and catalyst positioning, Tickeron's AI analytical framework would likely tilt in favor of EXR for tactical outperformance in the current environment. The reasoning is probabilistic rather than definitive: EXR's positive same-store revenue inflection, superior new-customer pricing power, and the ongoing synergy benefits from its Life Storage integration present a more immediate growth narrative. However, PSA holds the edge in balance sheet quality, margin stability, and strategic breadth — factors that typically support stronger risk-adjusted returns over full market cycles. The AI's preference would likely depend on the chosen time horizon, with EXR favored for near-term momentum-driven strategies and PSA better suited for defensive, income-oriented positioning. As always, these assessments reflect statistical probabilities derived from historical patterns and current fundamentals, not certainties about future performance.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EXR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePSA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EXR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PSA’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
EXR (@Miscellaneous Manufacturing) experienced а -0.30% price change this week, while PSA (@Miscellaneous Manufacturing) price change was +1.40% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry was -1.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.79%.
EXR is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.
PSA is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
Miscellaneous manufacturing refers to a diverse range of products that cannot readily be categorized into other specific sectors of manufacturing. Major U.S. players in this industry include AMETEK, Inc.( analytical instruments, precision components and specialty materials), Dover Corporation (solutions for efficiency and safety of extracting oil and gas, e.g. rod lifts, progressing cavity pumps, gas lifts etc.; solutions for the transportation/transformation of solid waste; products for safe handling of critical fluids for various industries; systems for commercial-refrigeration, heating and cooling, and food and beverage packaging), and Carlisle Companies Incorporated (niche markets including commercial roofing, energy, lawn and garden, mining and construction equipment, aerospace and electronics, dining and food delivery, and healthcare), among others.
| EXR | PSA | EXR / PSA | |
| Capitalization | 31.2B | 60.2B | 52% |
| EBITDA | 2.4B | 3.38B | 71% |
| Gain YTD | 15.994 | 26.701 | 60% |
| P/E Ratio | 33.19 | 166.57 | 20% |
| Revenue | 3.41B | 4.86B | 70% |
| Total Cash | 32M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 13.9B | 10B | 139% |
EXR | PSA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 71 | 65 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 10 Undervalued | 49 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 91 | 66 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 81 | 30 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | 4 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EXR's Valuation (10) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PSA (49). This means that EXR’s stock grew somewhat faster than PSA’s over the last 12 months.
PSA's Profit vs Risk Rating (66) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as EXR (91). This means that PSA’s stock grew similarly to EXR’s over the last 12 months.
PSA's SMR Rating (30) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EXR (81). This means that PSA’s stock grew somewhat faster than EXR’s over the last 12 months.
PSA's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as EXR (52). This means that PSA’s stock grew similarly to EXR’s over the last 12 months.
PSA's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EXR (55). This means that PSA’s stock grew somewhat faster than EXR’s over the last 12 months.
| EXR | PSA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 51% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 63% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 48% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 58% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 62% | 5 days ago 57% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 3 days ago 50% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PSA has been closely correlated with EXR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PSA jumps, then EXR could also see price increases.