EYE
Price
$12.66
Change
-$0.05 (-0.39%)
Updated
Mar 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.74B
65 days until earnings call
PAG
Price
$167.80
Change
-$0.93 (-0.55%)
Updated
Mar 3 closing price
Capitalization
10.86B
50 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

EYE vs PAG

Header iconEYE vs PAG Comparison
Open Charts EYE vs PAGBanner chart's image
National Vision Holdings
Price$12.66
Change-$0.05 (-0.39%)
Volume$1.89M
Capitalization1.74B
Penske Automotive Group
Price$167.80
Change-$0.93 (-0.55%)
Volume$304.08K
Capitalization10.86B
EYE vs PAG Comparison Chart
Loading...
EYE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EYE vs. PAG commentary
Mar 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EYE is a StrongBuy and PAG is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Mar 04, 2025
Stock price -- (EYE: $12.65 vs. PAG: $167.80)
Brand notoriety: EYE and PAG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EYE: 121% vs. PAG: 156%
Market capitalization -- EYE: $1.74B vs. PAG: $10.86B
EYE [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $1.74B. PAG’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $10.86B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $9.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EYE’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePAG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • EYE’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PAG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PAG is a better buy in the long-term than EYE.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EYE’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EYE’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PAG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EYE is a better buy in the short-term than PAG.

Price Growth

EYE (@Specialty Stores) experienced а +8.49% price change this week, while PAG (@Specialty Stores) price change was +1.85% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -1.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.00%.

Reported Earning Dates

EYE is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.

PAG is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (-1.96% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAG($10.9B) has a higher market cap than EYE($1.74B). EYE has higher P/E ratio than PAG: EYE (51.02) vs PAG (10.37). EYE YTD gains are higher at: 21.401 vs. PAG (10.903). PAG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.79B vs. EYE (54M). EYE has more cash in the bank: 150M vs. PAG (96.4M). EYE has less debt than PAG: EYE (923M) vs PAG (7.74B). PAG has higher revenues than EYE: PAG (29.5B) vs EYE (2.13B).
EYEPAGEYE / PAG
Capitalization1.74B10.9B16%
EBITDA54M1.79B3%
Gain YTD21.40110.903196%
P/E Ratio51.0210.37492%
Revenue2.13B29.5B7%
Total Cash150M96.4M156%
Total Debt923M7.74B12%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EYE vs PAG: Fundamental Ratings
EYE
PAG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7063
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1004
SMR RATING
1..100
8693
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4949
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1927
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EYE's Valuation (65) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as PAG (94). This means that EYE’s stock grew similarly to PAG’s over the last 12 months.

PAG's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Specialty Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for EYE (100). This means that PAG’s stock grew significantly faster than EYE’s over the last 12 months.

EYE's SMR Rating (86) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as PAG (93). This means that EYE’s stock grew similarly to PAG’s over the last 12 months.

EYE's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as PAG (49). This means that EYE’s stock grew similarly to PAG’s over the last 12 months.

EYE's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as PAG (27). This means that EYE’s stock grew similarly to PAG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EYEPAG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
EYE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RMOYX23.67N/A
N/A
Victory RS Mid Cap Growth Y
HNCRX18.21N/A
N/A
Hartford International Growth R3
ABPRX86.94N/A
N/A
AB Large Cap Growth R
GAOAX20.54-0.12
-0.58%
JPMorgan Global Allocation A
ESGYX20.71-0.22
-1.05%
Mirova Global Sustainable Equity Y

PAG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAG has been closely correlated with GPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAG jumps, then GPI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAG
1D Price
Change %
PAG100%
-0.55%
GPI - PAG
85%
Closely correlated
-1.85%
ABG - PAG
82%
Closely correlated
-3.29%
SAH - PAG
82%
Closely correlated
-3.01%
AN - PAG
76%
Closely correlated
-3.83%
LAD - PAG
71%
Closely correlated
-5.56%
More